Control: block 650601 by -1
On Mon, 18 Jan 2016 15:59:43 +0100 Daniel Stender wrote:
> I've begun to test the patch and for starters it doesn't clearly
apply to the
> code of the recent upstream tarball (they haven't released for too
long, +1116 commits) ...
>
>
On 24.01.2016 18:04, Tobias Frost wrote:
> Control: block 650601 by -1
>
> Hi Daniel,
>
> any progress?
>
> I'm nagging because this library is a reverse B-D for some pacakages --
> blocking the libpng transition.
>
> Tobi
Hi Tobias,
I can't get the isolated "compatibility fixes for numpy
On 18.01.2016 12:48, Tobias Frost wrote:
> Source: libvigraimpex
> Version: 1.10.0+dfsg-11
> Severity: serious
> Justification: FTBFS
>
> Hi Daniel,
>
> In the course of the libpng transition I rebuilt also this package, and it
> FTBFS.
> The buildlog is here:
Source: libvigraimpex
Version: 1.10.0+dfsg-11
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Hi Daniel,
In the course of the libpng transition I rebuilt also this package, and it
FTBFS.
The buildlog is here: http://libpng.sviech.de/old/keep/libvigraimpex.build
Cause seems to be the new pynum version,