Bug#811370: libvigraimpex: FTBFS in sid: test suite failure due to pynum 1.10

2016-01-24 Thread Tobias Frost
Control: block 650601 by -1  On Mon, 18 Jan 2016 15:59:43 +0100 Daniel Stender wrote: > I've begun to test the patch and for starters it doesn't clearly apply to the > code of the recent upstream tarball (they haven't released for too long, +1116 commits) ... >  >

Bug#811370: libvigraimpex: FTBFS in sid: test suite failure due to pynum 1.10

2016-01-24 Thread Daniel Stender
On 24.01.2016 18:04, Tobias Frost wrote: > Control: block 650601 by -1 > > Hi Daniel, > > any progress? > > I'm nagging because this library is a reverse B-D for some pacakages -- > blocking the libpng transition. > > Tobi Hi Tobias, I can't get the isolated "compatibility fixes for numpy

Bug#811370: libvigraimpex: FTBFS in sid: test suite failure due to pynum 1.10

2016-01-18 Thread Daniel Stender
On 18.01.2016 12:48, Tobias Frost wrote: > Source: libvigraimpex > Version: 1.10.0+dfsg-11 > Severity: serious > Justification: FTBFS > > Hi Daniel, > > In the course of the libpng transition I rebuilt also this package, and it > FTBFS. > The buildlog is here:

Bug#811370: libvigraimpex: FTBFS in sid: test suite failure due to pynum 1.10

2016-01-18 Thread Tobias Frost
Source: libvigraimpex Version: 1.10.0+dfsg-11 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Hi Daniel, In the course of the libpng transition I rebuilt also this package, and it FTBFS. The buildlog is here: http://libpng.sviech.de/old/keep/libvigraimpex.build Cause seems to be the new pynum version,