Bug#830681: trilinos-all-dev: Updating binutils breaks trilinos

2016-07-18 Thread Graham Inggs
On 18 July 2016 at 18:53, Nico Schlömer wrote: > @Graham, would you like to upload? Sure, will do tomorrow. -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org

Bug#830681: trilinos-all-dev: Updating binutils breaks trilinos

2016-07-18 Thread Nico Schlömer
I've tested and pushed a build without binutils. @Graham, would you like to upload? Cheers, Nico On Mon, Jul 18, 2016 at 1:26 PM Felix Salfelder wrote: > On Mon, Jul 18, 2016 at 11:18:30AM +, Nico Schlömer wrote: > > [binutils] just turn it off > > > > @Felix Agreed?

Bug#830681: trilinos-all-dev: Updating binutils breaks trilinos

2016-07-18 Thread Felix Salfelder
On Mon, Jul 18, 2016 at 11:18:30AM +, Nico Schlömer wrote: > [binutils] just turn it off > > @Felix Agreed? sure, makes sense! let's postpone the static link bfd thing. thank you felix -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org

Bug#830681: trilinos-all-dev: Updating binutils breaks trilinos

2016-07-18 Thread Nico Schlömer
The binutils support in trilinos is far from being critical, so I'd say for making things a little easier we just turn it off. @Felix Agreed? Cheers, Nico On Fri, Jul 15, 2016 at 12:15 AM Helmut Grohne wrote: > On Sun, Jul 10, 2016 at 01:04:13PM +0200, Felix Salfelder

Bug#830681: trilinos-all-dev: Updating binutils breaks trilinos

2016-07-14 Thread Helmut Grohne
On Sun, Jul 10, 2016 at 01:04:13PM +0200, Felix Salfelder wrote: > if that's correct, we shouldn't link libtrilinos_teuchoscore.so to a > particular revision of libbfd-2.26-system.so. how would that be > possible? > > otoh, if libbfd-2.26.1-system.so > - is meant to replace libbfd-2.26-system.so,

Bug#830681: trilinos-all-dev: Updating binutils breaks trilinos

2016-07-14 Thread Massimiliano Leoni
I see your point, so what do I do? Should I file a bug report against binutils? -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers

Bug#830681: trilinos-all-dev: Updating binutils breaks trilinos

2016-07-10 Thread Felix Salfelder
On Sun, Jul 10, 2016 at 12:07:11PM +0200, Massimiliano Leoni wrote: > The latest update of binutils to version 2.26.1-1 makes it imopssible to > compile against trilinos. The linker complains > > /usr/bin/ld: warning: libbfd-2.26-system.so, needed by > >

Bug#830681: trilinos-all-dev: Updating binutils breaks trilinos

2016-07-10 Thread Massimiliano Leoni
Package: trilinos-all-dev Version: 12.6.3-1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Dear Maintainer, The latest update of binutils to version 2.26.1-1 makes it imopssible to compile against trilinos. The linker complains /usr/bin/ld: warning: libbfd-2.26-system.so, needed by