Bug#851183: fenics: Misses important 'mshr' module

2017-03-16 Thread Drew Parsons
On Fri, 13 Jan 2017 16:48:22 +0100 Hagen Fuchs wrote: >  > > mshr needs a patched version of CGAL. >  > Ouf.  Anything I can do or is it simply a matter of just waiting for the > maintainers? >  Johannes has prepared a de-CGALed version in his  

Bug#851183: fenics: Misses important 'mshr' module

2017-01-13 Thread Hagen Fuchs
Dear Johannes, > No, not really - none of the demo programs in DOLFIN uses mshr. Got me there. The project I'm contributing to (micromagnetics software) switched to it and the only two examples I've found of any interest were using it. I /might/ have extrapolated a bit. ;) > mshr is already

Bug#851183: fenics: Misses important 'mshr' module

2017-01-13 Thread Johannes Ring
On Thu, Jan 12, 2017 at 8:35 PM, Hagen Fuchs wrote: > Fenics/Dolfin contains the core module 'mshr' which deals in meshes. > All current examples seem to be employing 'mshr', eg. > https://fenicsproject.org/qa/9414/fenics-mesh-generation-mark-inner-region No, not really - none

Bug#851183: fenics: Misses important 'mshr' module

2017-01-12 Thread Hagen Fuchs
Package: fenics Version: 2016.2.0.1 Severity: important Hello, Fenics/Dolfin contains the core module 'mshr' which deals in meshes. All current examples seem to be employing 'mshr', eg. https://fenicsproject.org/qa/9414/fenics-mesh-generation-mark-inner-region The Fenics project page mentions