Source: apertium-is-sv Version: 0.1.0~r56030-1 Severity: serious Tags: buster sid
Some recent change in unstable makes apertium-is-sv FTBFS: https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/history/apertium-is-sv.html https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/rb-pkg/unstable/amd64/apertium-is-sv.html ... cg-comp apertium-is-sv.is-sv.rlx is-sv.rlx.bin apertium-is-sv.is-sv.rlx: Error: Position on line 129 near `O Prop + Ant + Fem) ` - stand-alone o or O doesn't make sense - maybe you meant 0? apertium-is-sv.is-sv.rlx: Error: Position on line 130 near `O Prop + Ant + Fem) ` - stand-alone o or O doesn't make sense - maybe you meant 0? apertium-is-sv.is-sv.rlx: Error: Position on line 146 near `O A) (O N) (-1C VVer` - stand-alone o or O doesn't make sense - maybe you meant 0? apertium-is-sv.is-sv.rlx: Error: Position on line 148 near `O A) (O N) (1C N) (0` - stand-alone o or O doesn't make sense - maybe you meant 0? apertium-is-sv.is-sv.rlx: Error: Position on line 149 near `O A) (O N) (1C N) (0` - stand-alone o or O doesn't make sense - maybe you meant 0? apertium-is-sv.is-sv.rlx: Error: Position on line 150 near `O A) (O N) (1C N) (0` - stand-alone o or O doesn't make sense - maybe you meant 0? apertium-is-sv.is-sv.rlx: Error: Position on line 151 near `O A) (O N) (1C N) (0` - stand-alone o or O doesn't make sense - maybe you meant 0? apertium-is-sv.is-sv.rlx: Error: Position on line 155 near `O Prop) (1 Prop); #I` - stand-alone o or O doesn't make sense - maybe you meant 0? Error: Grammar could not be parsed - exiting! Makefile:714: recipe for target 'is-sv.rlx.bin' failed make[1]: *** [is-sv.rlx.bin] Error 1 make[1]: Leaving directory '/build/1st/apertium-is-sv-0.1.0~r56030' dh_auto_build: make -j1 returned exit code 2 debian/rules:9: recipe for target 'build' failed make: *** [build] Error 2 -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers
