On Thu, 2017-09-07 at 08:44 +0200, Tino Didriksen wrote:
> It's one out of a hundred tests that fails.
Sounds like that particular test should have its result ignored on
big-endian platforms since the code isn't written in a portable manner.
Disabling or ignoring all the tests isn't appropriate.
On 7 September 2017 at 03:15, Paul Wise wrote:
> Why do the tests for hfst need to be disabled?
>
> I think it would be better to keep them enabled so that we can ensure
> that hfst works correctly. Broken binaries are worse than FTBFS. You
> can ask for removal of the existing
That's my bad. In the confusion of bugs #824119 and #827199 , I forgot to
re-disable tests for hfst.
-- Tino Didriksen
On 23 August 2017 at 18:38, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> Source: hfst
> Version: 3.12.2~r3289-1
> Severity: serious
>
>
Source: hfst
Version: 3.12.2~r3289-1
Severity: serious
https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=hfst=sid
...
Making check in tools
make[3]: Entering directory '/<>/tools'
Making check in src
make[4]: Entering directory '/<>/tools/src'
Making check in hfst-proc
make[5]: Entering directory