python-threadpoolctl_2.0.0-1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
python-threadpoolctl_2.0.0-1.dsc
python-threadpoolctl_2.0.0.orig.tar.gz
python-threadpoolctl_2.0.0-1.debian.tar.xz
python-threadpoolctl_2.0.0-1_amd64.buildinfo
python3-threadpoolctl_2.0.0-1
Hi,
I tried to send an email to debian-science-maintain...@lists.debian.org but
that did not work. I received a lintian warning for using the alioth part in the
email address "debian-science-maintain...@lists.alioth.debian.org“.
Regards
Friedrich
> Anfang der weitergeleiteten Nachricht:
>
> V
qutip_4.5.1-1_source.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
qutip_4.5.1-1.dsc
qutip_4.5.1.orig.tar.gz
qutip_4.5.1-1.debian.tar.xz
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host usper.debian.org)
--
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
debian-scie
Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Fri, 22 May 2020 13:19:11 +0800
Source: qutip
Architecture: source
Version: 4.5.1-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian Science Maintainers
Changed-By: Drew Parsons
Changes:
qutip (4.5.1-1) uns
binary:python3-threadpoolctl is NEW.
binary:python3-threadpoolctl is NEW.
source:python-threadpoolctl is NEW.
Your package has been put into the NEW queue, which requires manual action
from the ftpteam to process. The upload was otherwise valid (it had a good
OpenPGP signature and file hashes are
Hi Friedrich
On Fri, 22 May 2020 at 10:04, Friedrich Beckmann
wrote:
> I tried to send an email to debian-science-maintain...@lists.debian.org but
> that did not work. I received a lintian warning for using the alioth part in
> the
> email address "debian-science-maintain...@lists.alioth.debian.
Please permit me to write to you irrespective of the fact we have not met
before. However, your reputable profile gives me the impression to engage you
to be a suitable partner in a multi million dollar project which I will give
further details upon receipt of your response to this mail.
My nam
ceres-solver_1.14.0-7_source.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
ceres-solver_1.14.0-7.dsc
ceres-solver_1.14.0-7.debian.tar.xz
ceres-solver_1.14.0-7_source.buildinfo
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host usper.debian.org)
--
debian-scien
Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Fri, 22 May 2020 13:12:47 +0200
Source: ceres-solver
Architecture: source
Version: 1.14.0-7
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian Science Team
Changed-By: Jochen Sprickerhof
Closes: 902150
Changes
Your message dated Fri, 22 May 2020 11:33:36 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#902150: fixed in ceres-solver 1.14.0-7
has caused the Debian Bug report #902150,
regarding ceres-solver FTBFS on arm64/ppc64el: evaluation_callback_test (Failed)
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim
euslisp_9.27+dfsg-4_source.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
euslisp_9.27+dfsg-4.dsc
euslisp_9.27+dfsg-4.debian.tar.xz
euslisp_9.27+dfsg-4_source.buildinfo
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host usper.debian.org)
--
debian-science-maint
Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Fri, 22 May 2020 13:48:33 +0200
Source: euslisp
Architecture: source
Version: 9.27+dfsg-4
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian Science Maintainers
Changed-By: Jochen Sprickerhof
Changes:
euslisp
pspp_1.2.0-4_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
pspp_1.2.0-4.dsc
pspp_1.2.0-4.debian.tar.xz
pspp-dbgsym_1.2.0-4_amd64.deb
pspp_1.2.0-4_amd64.buildinfo
pspp_1.2.0-4_amd64.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host usper.debian.org
binary:pspp is NEW.
binary:pspp is NEW.
source:pspp is NEW.
Your package has been put into the NEW queue, which requires manual action
from the ftpteam to process. The upload was otherwise valid (it had a good
OpenPGP signature and file hashes are valid), so please be patient.
Packages are routin
Hi,
I don't understand why you report a bug on 1.5.0.87+dfsg1-1 on the 20th
of may when testing has 1.5.0.87+dfsg1-4 since the 9th of march, and
unstable had it since the 4th of march.
Isn't the problem history already?
JP
--
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
debian-science-maintainers@a
Hello
Did you authorize Maria Davis to claim your $10.5m?
SIGNED
DR MUHAMMED ISAH
DIRECTOR CODE OF CONDUCT BUREAU
codeofconductmuhamm...@gmail.com
--
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
debian-science-maintainers@alioth-lists.debian.net
https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listi
harp_1.11-1_source.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
harp_1.11-1.dsc
harp_1.11.orig.tar.xz
harp_1.11-1.debian.tar.xz
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host usper.debian.org)
--
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
debian-science-main
Source-only uploads to NEW are not allowed.
binary:libharp11 is NEW.
===
Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why
your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our
concerns.
--
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
debian-science-maintaine
Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Fri, 22 May 2020 14:09:07 +0200
Source: pspp
Binary: pspp pspp-dbgsym
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 1.2.0-4
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian Science Team
Changed-By: Friedrich Beckmann
Your message dated Fri, 22 May 2020 19:00:10 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#923417: fixed in pspp 1.2.0-4
has caused the Debian Bug report #923417,
regarding pspp: CVE-2019-9211
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the ca
Your message dated Fri, 22 May 2020 19:00:10 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#932951: fixed in pspp 1.2.0-4
has caused the Debian Bug report #932951,
regarding pspp build-depends on cruft package.
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If t
pcl_1.11.0+dfsg-1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
pcl_1.11.0+dfsg-1.dsc
pcl_1.11.0+dfsg.orig.tar.xz
pcl_1.11.0+dfsg-1.debian.tar.xz
libpcl-apps1.11-dbgsym_1.11.0+dfsg-1_amd64.deb
libpcl-apps1.11_1.11.0+dfsg-1_amd64.deb
libpcl-common1.11-dbgsym_1.11
Do you require funding? For Business or Personal loan without stress and Quick
approval, email us for more Info.
Regards,
David Hu
--
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
debian-science-maintainers@alioth-lists.debian.net
https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-scienc
binary:libpcl-apps1.11 is NEW.
binary:libpcl-common1.11 is NEW.
binary:libpcl-features1.11 is NEW.
binary:libpcl-filters1.11 is NEW.
binary:libpcl-io1.11 is NEW.
binary:libpcl-kdtree1.11 is NEW.
binary:libpcl-keypoints1.11 is NEW.
binary:libpcl-ml1.11 is NEW.
binary:libpcl-octree1.11 is NEW.
binary
harp_1.11-1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
harp_1.11-1.dsc
harp_1.11.orig.tar.xz
harp_1.11-1.debian.tar.xz
harp-dbgsym_1.11-1_amd64.deb
harp_1.11-1_amd64.buildinfo
harp_1.11-1_amd64.deb
libharp-dev_1.11-1_amd64.deb
libharp11-dbgsym_1.11-1_amd6
binary:libharp11 is NEW.
binary:libharp11 is NEW.
Your package has been put into the NEW queue, which requires manual action
from the ftpteam to process. The upload was otherwise valid (it had a good
OpenPGP signature and file hashes are valid), so please be patient.
Packages are routinely proces
FYI: The status of the libstxxl source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.
Previous version: (not in testing)
Current version: 1.4.1-3
--
This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of
new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you wi
FYI: The status of the freefem++ source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.
Previous version: (not in testing)
Current version: 3.61.1+dfsg1-5.1
--
This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of
new packages into testing happens multiple times a
sdpb 1.0-3 is marked for autoremoval from testing on 2020-06-13
It is affected by these RC bugs:
960656: sdpb: FTBFS on mipsel
--
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
debian-science-maintainers@alioth-lists.debian.net
https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-ma
libstxxl 1.4.1-3 is marked for autoremoval from testing on 2020-06-06
It is affected by these RC bugs:
921298: libstxxl: FTBFS with upcoming doxygen 1.8.15
--
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
debian-science-maintainers@alioth-lists.debian.net
https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailm
FYI: The status of the pivy source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.
Previous version: (not in testing)
Current version: 0.6.5-1
--
This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of
new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you will r
Hi, the Debian project is discussing whether we should start providing a
64 bit build of PETSc (which means we'd have to upgrade our entire
computational library stack, starting from BLAS and going through MPI,
MUMPS, etc).
A default PETSc build uses 32 bit addressing to index vectors and
mat
Drew Parsons writes:
> Hi, the Debian project is discussing whether we should start providing a
> 64 bit build of PETSc (which means we'd have to upgrade our entire
> computational library stack, starting from BLAS and going through MPI,
> MUMPS, etc).
You don't need to change BLAS or MPI.
>
On 2020-05-23 14:18, Jed Brown wrote:
Drew Parsons writes:
Hi, the Debian project is discussing whether we should start providing
a
64 bit build of PETSc (which means we'd have to upgrade our entire
computational library stack, starting from BLAS and going through MPI,
MUMPS, etc).
You don'
34 matches
Mail list logo
