Bug#836844: eigen3: autopkgtests fail on ppc64el

On Sun, 13 Nov 2016 18:04:28 +0200 Graham Inggs wrote: > Control: reopen -1 > > I've just checked eigen3 3.3.0-1 on plummer.debian.org, and it still outputs > > forceMatrix*axisMatrix: -1 0 0 > 0 -2 0 > 0 0 -3 > > I have checked with current dev. tree and problem

Re: Comments from ftpmaster regarding spdep Debian package

Hi Andreas, On Wed, 30 Jul 2014, Andreas Tille wrote: Hi Roger, I tried to package spdep for Debian on behalf of the Debian Science team. The Debian ftpmaster had some issues before he will accept the package. Could you please clarify the points below. Thanks a lot and also thanks

Re: Comments from ftpmaster regarding spdep Debian package

their packaging systems other than very bad experiences with people with messed up GIS packages). If you want me to patch anything, diff from spdep/inst/README on R-forge. In particular: Copyright: 2005 Yongwan Chun, Michael Tiefelsdorf and Roger Bivand License: GPL-2+ looks very wrong. The list

Re: Comments from ftpmaster regarding spdep Debian package

On Wed, 30 Jul 2014, Andreas Tille wrote: Hi Roger, On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 09:36:22PM +0200, Roger Bivand wrote: Hi Andreas, This isn't a patch to my spdep/inst/README file. No, it's not! :-) I have no knowledge of any debian/copyright file, and cannot take responsibility

Re: Comments from ftpmaster regarding spdep Debian package

On Thu, 31 Jul 2014, Andreas Tille wrote: Hi Roger, I'm very astonished that this thread which started with two very simple questions exagerated to such a time consuming discussion. Most questions are not as simple as they appear, think ontologies. Mine differs from yours. You haven't toød

Re: Comments from ftpmaster regarding spdep Debian package

of that package? I'm not aware of what might be non-free there; maybe the data files for examples and testing? Nobody has asked me about that. Best wishes, Roger On Thu, 31 Jul 2014, Andreas Tille wrote: Hi Roger, On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 03:47:34PM +0200, Roger Bivand wrote: I'm very

Re: Comments from ftpmaster regarding spdep Debian package

On Thu, 31 Jul 2014, Andreas Tille wrote: Hi Roger, On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 06:42:06PM +0200, Roger Bivand wrote: Hi Andreas, Given surveillance rather than my (wrong) guess, I'm willing to do what I can - I agree that actual use in epidemiology is worth facilitating. Should the soigraph

Re: r-cran-spdep_0.6-4-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

the soigraph.c function names to show that they are modified from those in arm.c, but I do not see the point. Best wishes, Roger On Mon, 30 May 2016, Andreas Tille wrote: Hi again Roger, this is just a ping in case you might have missed my last mail about the licensing of the file copied from

Re: r-cran-spdep_0.6-4-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

are needed. Roger On Mon, 30 May 2016, Andreas Tille wrote: Hi Roger, On Mon, May 30, 2016 at 05:51:57PM +0200, Roger Bivand wrote: Please tell them that I am not willing to make any further changes. If they bothered to look, they would have seen that the functions are not simply copied from

Re: Comments regarding r-cran-spdep_0.5-92-1_amd64.changes

years without attracting Debian's ire. Nicholas and I understood in 2001 that ... may be freely redistributed ... could reasonably be taken as permission to include and redistribute these small functions. Do you want me to revisit the separate packaging of data sets? Best wishes, Roger On Mon, 4 Apr