Bug#890364: pybind11-dev: Request migration to unstable
Source: pybind11 Followup-For: Bug #890364 For testing proposes I ran the ratt tool in my system to check if something would be broken with the update. - 8< - jrivero@nium tmp $ ratt pybind11_2.2.1-1_source.changes 2018/02/21 23:07:51 Loading changes file "pybind11_2.2.1-1_source.changes" 2018/02/21 23:07:51 - 4 binary packages: pybind11-dev pybind11-doc python-pybind11 python3-pybind11 2018/02/21 23:07:51 - corresponding .debs (will be injected when building): 2018/02/21 23:07:51 Figuring out reverse build dependencies using dose-ceve(1). This might take a while 2018/02/21 23:07:51 dose-ceve(1) failed (exec: "dose-ceve": executable file not found in $PATH), falling back to interpreting Sources directly 2018/02/21 23:07:51 Loading sources index "/var/lib/apt/lists/ftp.us.debian.org_debian_dists_sid_main_source_Sources" 2018/02/21 23:07:53 Setting -sbuild_dist=experimental (from .changes file) 2018/02/21 23:07:53 Building ovito_2.9.0+dfsg1-5 (commandline: [sbuild --arch-all --dist=experimental --nolog ovito_2.9.0+dfsg1-5]) 2018/02/21 23:12:16 building ovito_2.9.0+dfsg1-5 failed: exit status 2 2018/02/21 23:12:16 Building psi4_1:1.1-5 (commandline: [sbuild --arch-all --dist=experimental --nolog psi4_1:1.1-5]) 2018/02/22 00:10:01 Building xtensor-python_0.12.4-1 (commandline: [sbuild --arch-all --dist=experimental --nolog xtensor-python_0.12.4-1]) 2018/02/22 00:12:22 Build results: 2018/02/22 00:12:22 PASSED: psi4_1:1.1-5 2018/02/22 00:12:22 PASSED: xtensor-python_0.12.4-1 2018/02/22 00:12:22 FAILED: ovito_2.9.0+dfsg1-5 (see buildlogs/ovito_2.9.0+dfsg1-5) - 8< - Ovito failed and log displays this problem: - 8< - -- Found Libav: /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu -- Found ZLIB: /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libz.so (found version "1.2.8") -- Found OpenGL: /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libOpenGL.so -- Found PythonInterp: /usr/bin/python3 (found version "3.6.4") -- Found PythonLibs: /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libpython3.6m.so (found version "3.6.4+") CMake Error at /usr/share/cmake-3.10/Modules/FindPackageHandleStandardArgs.cmake:137 (message): Could NOT find QScintilla (missing: QSCINTILLA_LIBRARY) Call Stack (most recent call first): /usr/share/cmake-3.10/Modules/FindPackageHandleStandardArgs.cmake:378 (_FPHSA_FAILURE_MESSAGE) cmake/FindQScintilla.cmake:13 (FIND_PACKAGE_HANDLE_STANDARD_ARGS) src/plugins/pyscript/gui/CMakeLists.txt:22 (FIND_PACKAGE) -- Configuring incomplete, errors occurred! - 8< - Which I think it is unrelated to the upgrade of pybind and was reported in https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=885644 If there is any other test that we can help with, please let us know. Thanks! -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers
Bug#890364: pybind11-dev: Request migration to unstable
Hi Ghis, Thank you! What is the likelihood of migration before March 1st (date of ubuntu Bionic Debian import freeze)? Cheers, Shane On Wed, Feb 14, 2018 at 1:34 AM, Ghislain Vaillant wrote: > Hi Shane, thanks for reaching out, > > On Wed, 14 Feb 2018 00:48:14 + Shane Loretz rg> wrote: > > Would the maintainer be willing to migrate 2.2.1 from experimental to > unstable? I'm a user of a distribution based on debian unstable. I have > been using pybind11 from pip previously. The package in experimental > appears to be working flawlessly for my usecase and has some nice new > features not in the version currently in unstable. > > There are a few rdpends I have got to test first to guarantee a smooth > upgrade. But yes, I intend to migrate the new version to unstable soon. > > Cheers, > Ghis > -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers
Bug#890364: pybind11-dev: Request migration to unstable
Hi Shane, thanks for reaching out, On Wed, 14 Feb 2018 00:48:14 + Shane Loretz wrote: > Would the maintainer be willing to migrate 2.2.1 from experimental to unstable? I'm a user of a distribution based on debian unstable. I have been using pybind11 from pip previously. The package in experimental appears to be working flawlessly for my usecase and has some nice new features not in the version currently in unstable. There are a few rdpends I have got to test first to guarantee a smooth upgrade. But yes, I intend to migrate the new version to unstable soon. Cheers, Ghis -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers
Bug#890364: pybind11-dev: Request migration to unstable
Package: pybind11-dev Version: 2.2.1-1 Severity: wishlist Dear Maintainer, Would the maintainer be willing to migrate 2.2.1 from experimental to unstable? I'm a user of a distribution based on debian unstable. I have been using pybind11 from pip previously. The package in experimental appears to be working flawlessly for my usecase and has some nice new features not in the version currently in unstable. -- System Information: Debian Release: buster/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 4.13.0-26-generic (SMP w/8 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968), LANGUAGE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /usr/bin/dash Init: unable to detect pybind11-dev depends on no packages. pybind11-dev recommends no packages. Versions of packages pybind11-dev suggests: pn libeigen3-dev pn pybind11-doc -- no debconf information -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers