Re: Help needed for licnse review (Was: r-cran-utf8_1.1.3-1_amd64.changes REJECTED)

2018-01-14 Thread Philip Rinn
> to upgrade r-cran-tibble this package is needed. I noticed that the code (see > Git[2]) contains a file > > src/utf8lite/LICENSE.Unicode > > with an extra license. However, I don't see to what files the license might > apply. My interpretation is that the license covers all files accessible

RFS: scram/0.16.2-1

2018-01-14 Thread Olzhas Rakhimov
Hello All, Is source-only uploads into mentors.debian.net acceptable for review? scram 0.16.2 is moved to C++17 requiring gcc7, boost 1.61, qt 5.9, so I am currently on franken-Ubuntu 16.04 with custom ppas to build it. However, it doesn't build this way with gbp, so I only used debuild -S.

Re: RFS: scram/0.16.2-1

2018-01-14 Thread David Bremner
Olzhas Rakhimov writes: > Hello All, > > Is source-only uploads into mentors.debian.net acceptable for review? > > scram 0.16.2 is moved to C++17 requiring gcc7, boost 1.61, qt 5.9, > so I am currently on franken-Ubuntu 16.04 with custom ppas to build it. > However, it

Re: RFS: scram/0.16.2-1

2018-01-14 Thread Olzhas Rakhimov
On Sun, Jan 14, 2018 at 11:50 AM, David Bremner wrote: > > If you can't build it on debian unstable, it's not ready for upload yet. > ​It should build just fine. I have it built on Ubuntu 17.10 and 18.04: https://launchpad.net/~rakhimov/+archive/ubuntu/scram It is just that

Re: RFS: scram/0.16.2-1

2018-01-14 Thread Olzhas Rakhimov
On Sun, Jan 14, 2018 at 12:28 PM, Sébastien Villemot wrote: > > Note that your versioned dependency on g++ (>= 7.1) is not working as you > want > (it won’t enforce the requirement that you have in mind. > > Since g++ has an epoch number (currently 4), what you want is g++

Re: RFS: scram/0.16.2-1

2018-01-14 Thread Sébastien Villemot
On Sun, Jan 14, 2018 at 08:39:36AM -0800, Olzhas Rakhimov wrote: > scram 0.16.2 is moved to C++17 requiring gcc7, boost 1.61, qt 5.9, > so I am currently on franken-Ubuntu 16.04 with custom ppas to build it. Note that your versioned dependency on g++ (>= 7.1) is not working as you want (it won’t

Re: RFS: scram/0.16.2-1

2018-01-14 Thread Sébastien Villemot
On Sun, Jan 14, 2018 at 12:35:25PM -0800, Olzhas Rakhimov wrote: > On Sun, Jan 14, 2018 at 12:28 PM, Sébastien Villemot > wrote: > > > > > Note that your versioned dependency on g++ (>= 7.1) is not working as you > > want > > (it won’t enforce the requirement that you have

Re: RFS: scram/0.16.2-1

2018-01-14 Thread Olzhas Rakhimov
On Sun, Jan 14, 2018 at 09:45:20PM +0100, Sébastien Villemot wrote: > > About epochs in general: > > https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/#version > > About the current epoch of the g++ package: > > apt show g++ Thanks for guiding. > You may want to update the Vcs-* fields with the new

Re: Help needed for licnse review (Was: r-cran-utf8_1.1.3-1_amd64.changes REJECTED)

2018-01-14 Thread Chris Lamb
Hi Andreas et al., > Any help to fix the copyright would be welcome. Have you tried asking upstream to clarify the matter? :) If they reply, please quote them — in full — in debian/copyright for easy future visibility to all. Best wishes, -- ,''`. : :' : Chris Lamb `.