Re: Tried to upgrade skimage to see whether #945389 is fixed but failed

2019-12-03 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Ole, On Mon, Dec 02, 2019 at 01:01:07PM +0100, Ole Streicher wrote: > Hi Andreas, > > I think that is the moment where the skimage build should be simplified > to the "official" build process: Python convention is that symbols > starting with an underscore are internal only (and ofcourse

Re: Tried to upgrade skimage to see whether #945389 is fixed but failed

2019-12-03 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Ole, I had a quick look what you mean and tried to make the build more standard[1]. The build issues are remaining and need some work. Kind regards, Andreas. [1] https://salsa.debian.org/science-team/skimage/commit/d787835f7293dc105b9b8cf37d59c1f9fbf46110 On Mon, Dec 02, 2019 at

Re: Python3 Port of ModelBuilder

2019-12-03 Thread Flavio Coelho
Hello, Right now, I can't dedicate time towards porting ModelBuilder. It should be a quick fix to port to Python3. BIP is already python3 compatible. So whatever you decide is fine with me. thanks, Flávio Codeço Coelho On Tue, Dec 3, 2019 at 4:48 AM Andreas Tille wrote: > Hi Scott, > > On

Re: Python3 Port of ModelBuilder

2019-12-03 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi, if someone will show interest by writing an autopkgtest (or would provide some test script to prove the functionality which I'd volunteer to turn into an autopkgtest) I'd feel slightly motivated to package BIP and try my luck with a Python3 port. Kind regards Andreas. On Tue, Dec 03,

Fwd: Re: libmseed licensing

2019-12-03 Thread Pierre Duperray
Sorry list " this is a maintainer 2 maintainer message " Paride your mailhost is blacklisted, and I can't reply... below is my response. In the hope you subscribed to debian-science. Cheers, Pierre Forwarded Message Subject:Re: libmseed licensing Date: Tue, 3

Re: Bug#945389: Tried to upgrade skimage to see whether #945389 is fixed but failed

2019-12-03 Thread Stefan van der Walt
Hi Andreas and Ole, The problem here stems from an old version of Cython. My recommended approach would be to build from the git tag instead of the source tarball (i.e., the version without pre-generated Cython files). I don't think the Cython-related patches that were applied since would

Re: Fwd: Re: libmseed licensing

2019-12-03 Thread Paride Legovini
Pierre Duperray wrote on 03/12/2019: > > Hello Paride, > > On 12/3/19 2:09 PM, Paride Legovini wrote: >> Hi Pierre, >> >> I'm working at the libmseed3 Debian package. One thing I noticed is that >> IRIS relicensed libmseed from LGPL-3.0+ to Apache-2.0, plus there are a >> couple of files in the