Re: Python3 Port of ModelBuilder

2019-12-02 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Scott, On Mon, Dec 02, 2019 at 12:18:38PM -0500, Scott Talbert wrote: > On Tue, 8 Oct 2019, Andreas Tille wrote: > > > Hi Flávio, > > > > Varun Hiremath once cared for Debian packages of ModelBuilder[1]. His > > effort seemed to have been stalled and so Debian

Re: Tried to upgrade skimage to see whether #945389 is fixed but failed

2019-12-03 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Ole, On Mon, Dec 02, 2019 at 01:01:07PM +0100, Ole Streicher wrote: > Hi Andreas, > > I think that is the moment where the skimage build should be simplified > to the "official" build process: Python convention is that symbols > starting with an underscore are internal only (and ofcourse subje

Re: Tried to upgrade skimage to see whether #945389 is fixed but failed

2019-12-03 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Ole, I had a quick look what you mean and tried to make the build more standard[1]. The build issues are remaining and need some work. Kind regards, Andreas. [1] https://salsa.debian.org/science-team/skimage/commit/d787835f7293dc105b9b8cf37d59c1f9fbf46110 On Mon, Dec 02, 2019 at 01:01:07PM

Re: Python3 Port of ModelBuilder

2019-12-03 Thread Andreas Tille
gt; > Flávio Codeço Coelho > > On Tue, Dec 3, 2019 at 4:48 AM Andreas Tille wrote: > > > Hi Scott, > > > > On Mon, Dec 02, 2019 at 12:18:38PM -0500, Scott Talbert wrote: > > > On Tue, 8 Oct 2019, Andreas Tille wrote: > > > > > > >

Re: Bug#945389: Tried to upgrade skimage to see whether #945389 is fixed but failed

2019-12-04 Thread Andreas Tille
hangelog +++ b/debian/changelog @@ -4,6 +4,8 @@ skimage (0.16.2-1) UNRELEASED; urgency=medium * New upstream version * Standards-Version: 4.4.1 * More default d/rules + * Drop Stefan van der Walt from Uploaders since he confirmed not to +do packaging work any more (thanks for your pre

Re: Bug#945389: Tried to upgrade skimage to see whether #945389 is fixed but failed

2019-12-05 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Stefan, On Thu, Dec 05, 2019 at 10:18:01AM -0800, Stefan van der Walt wrote: > On Wed, 04 Dec 2019 09:53:03 +0100, Andreas Tille wrote: > > Hmmm, I think the Cython files are generated in the build I did. > > Sorry, I missed that! I saw at the bottom of the log: > > E

Re: Issue in spview package

2019-12-06 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi, On Fri, Dec 06, 2019 at 10:20:15AM +0100, Cyril Richard wrote: > Hello everyone. > I have an issue with the new package spview: > a new source-only upload is needed to allow migration > > I did take a look to https://wiki.debian.org/SourceOnlyUpload but I'm not > sure what I have to do to fix

Re: [need mentor] GSoC Proposal: Enhancement to Debian's BLAS/LAPACK Ecosys

2019-12-12 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Lumin, since I need to admit that I have no idea about BLAS/LAPACK and I'm just a happy user of these packages as dependencies of several of my own packages, I'm volunteering to co-mentor this project since I regard it really important and would love to see it happen. A real mentor who can giv

Re: [need mentor] GSoC Proposal: Enhancement to Debian's BLAS/LAPACK Ecosys

2019-12-12 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi, On Thu, Dec 12, 2019 at 11:26:39AM +0100, Sébastien Villemot wrote: > Hi Lumin and Andreas, > > Le jeudi 12 décembre 2019 à 11:11 +0100, Andreas Tille a écrit : > > > since I need to admit that I have no idea about BLAS/LAPACK and I'm just > > a happy user of t

Re: petsc 3.11 for ubuntu

2019-12-12 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Christophe, On Thu, Dec 12, 2019 at 09:38:55AM +0100, Christophe Trophime wrote: > Hi, > there is a very annoying bug #945338 that prevents petsc 3.11 > to be installed on Ubuntu eoan... > > I've send an email with a fix on the bugreport. > see https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi

Moving libsvm to Debian Science team

2019-12-20 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Chen-Tse, I'm maintaining a package that depends from libsvm. Due to bug #936924 that did not received any response since August it is in danger to be removed from testing so I'm interested that this bug will be fixed. When looking at the package I realised that while it would fit into Debian

Re: Moving libsvm to Debian Science team

2019-12-21 Thread Andreas Tille
s Python2) and proceed from here. Kind regards Andreas. > On Sat, Dec 21, 2019 at 08:35:28AM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote: > > Hi Chen-Tse, > > > > I'm maintaining a package that depends from libsvm. Due to bug #936924 > > that did not received any response since

Re: Bug#936924: Moving libsvm to Debian Science team

2019-12-21 Thread Andreas Tille
d not eliminate the Python2 dependency fully. Kind regards Andreas. > On Sat, Dec 21, 2019 at 7:39 AM Andreas Tille wrote: > > > On Sat, Dec 21, 2019 at 08:28:57AM +, Mo Zhou wrote: > > > I second this proposal, and the same for src:liblinear. > > >

Re: Bug#936924: Moving libsvm to Debian Science team

2019-12-21 Thread Andreas Tille
a lot for your cooperation Andreas. > On Sat, Dec 21, 2019 at 12:27 PM Andreas Tille wrote: > > > Hi Chen-Tse, > > > > thanks for you quick response. > > > > On Sat, Dec 21, 2019 at 09:48:14AM -0500, Chen-Tse Tsai wrote: > > > Hi, Andreas,

Re: lmfit-py: failing tests with python3.8

2019-12-21 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi, I tried hard to get lmfit-py (now at upstream version 1.0.0) building but I endet up with build succeeded, 73 warnings. The HTML pages are in build/html. Exception occurred: File "/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/sphinx_gallery/gen_gallery.py", line 313, in sumarize_failing_examples

Re: Bug#936924: Moving libsvm to Debian Science team

2019-12-22 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Chen-Tse, On Sun, Dec 22, 2019 at 09:47:44PM -0500, Chen-Tse Tsai wrote: > I'm working on an update which removes dependency on cdbs and python2. I'm > using liblinear package as the reference. I'll send you something for > review some time this week. Thanks a lot. That's really appreciated

Re: Bug#936924: Moving libsvm to Debian Science team

2019-12-23 Thread Andreas Tille
On Mon, Dec 23, 2019 at 03:06:37PM -0500, Chen-Tse Tsai wrote: > I have a quick question. Previously the python modules are installed to > /usr/share/pyshared/. Should I use /usr/lib/python3/dist-packages instead > if I change it to python3? I see this in the policy and this is also what > liblinea

Re: Bug#936924: Moving libsvm to Debian Science team

2019-12-24 Thread Andreas Tille
. Since I noticed that the new upstream source includes some windows binaries I'll remove them via Files-Excluded. I hope that you are happy that I'm doing these routine tasks and will sponsor the package for you once ready. Kind regards, Andreas. > Thanks, > Chen-Tse > &g

Re: Bug#936924: Moving libsvm to Debian Science team

2019-12-25 Thread Andreas Tille
On Wed, Dec 25, 2019 at 10:03:00AM +0100, Christian Kastner wrote: > Andreas, what are you doing? > > On 2019-12-25 07:52, Andreas Tille wrote: > > On Tue, Dec 24, 2019 at 10:39:55AM -0500, Chen-Tse Tsai wrote: > >> I just submitted a PR for dropping python2

Re: Bug#936924: Moving libsvm to Debian Science team

2019-12-25 Thread Andreas Tille
On Wed, Dec 25, 2019 at 03:04:47PM +0100, Christian Kastner wrote: > On 2019-12-25 10:59, Andreas Tille wrote: > > Kind regards > > > >Andreas. > > I've re-read my original message and feel that I was overly harsh. I was > irritated about the rushed

Re: Bug#936924: Moving libsvm to Debian Science team

2019-12-25 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi, On Wed, Dec 25, 2019 at 06:26:49PM +0100, Christian Kastner wrote: > > If you like gbp, then it's already a team win :-) +1 > Yeah, the C++ symbols generated are the mangled versions. You need to > unmangle them by piping the generated file through c++filt, and then add > the (c++) prefix

Does anybody know a Python3 fork of pebl (Python Environment for Bayesian Learning)? [Was: Is there any Python3 version of pebl]

2020-01-03 Thread Andreas Tille
its basically abandoned. I > haven’t looked at any of the forks so unsure which are popular or being > kept up-to-date. > > On Mon, Dec 30, 2019 at 12:56 PM Andreas Tille wrote: > > > Hi Abhik, > > > > thanks for the quick reply. > > > > On Sun, Dec 29, 201

cblas / gsl hint needed (Was: Bug#936609: Ported ghmm to Python3 but issues with clapack)

2020-01-04 Thread Andreas Tille
Control: tags -1 help Hi, I was asking upstream about this issue[1] and an issue about gsl usage is suspected. Any hint how this can be fixed? > Finally I have a question about building with lapack. I get: > > ... > libtool: compile: gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I.. -I.. -Wdate-time > -D_FORTIF

Re: cblas / gsl hint needed (Was: Bug#936609: Ported ghmm to Python3 but issues with clapack)

2020-01-06 Thread Andreas Tille
k to this hint. Kind regards Andreas. > On Sun, Jan 05, 2020 at 07:55:05AM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote: > > Control: tags -1 help > > > > Hi, > > > > I was asking upstream about this issue[1] and an issue about gsl usage > > is suspected. Any hint

Re: Bug#936924: Moving libsvm to Debian Science team

2020-01-10 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi folks, I somehow missed https://alioth-lists.debian.net/pipermail/debian-science-maintainers/2019-December/076981.html since my upload was a bit questionable this gives us the chance to discuss it again. What option would you prefer: 1. I just re-upload what is in Git right now to ne

Re: Bug#936924: Moving libsvm to Debian Science team

2020-01-10 Thread Andreas Tille
On Fri, Jan 10, 2020 at 11:45:15PM +0100, Christian Kastner wrote: > > @Andreas: I can't push my changes to master, I get a protected branch > error. Could you please grant me the necessary privileges? Strange. I did not intentionally set the branch protection. Hope it works now. > There's a

Re: Bug#936924: Moving libsvm to Debian Science team

2020-01-12 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Christian, On Sun, Jan 12, 2020 at 11:42:58AM +0100, Christian Kastner wrote: > Pushing worked after this, thanks. :-) > I test-rebuilt all packages with build dependencies on libsvm packages, > and most of them built successfully. Here are the issues I encountered: > > * src:pymvpa2 >

Re: cblas / gsl hint needed (Was: Bug#936609: Ported ghmm to Python3 but issues with clapack)

2020-01-27 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi again, with my last mail I wanted to express: H, to stupid to turn this hint into real code. Any more detailed hint / patch would be really welcome. Kind regards Andreas. On Mon, Jan 06, 2020 at 12:56:17PM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote: > Hi Mo, > > On Sun, Jan 05, 2020

Re: salsa admin needed (fix or delete ffcx repo as fenics subproject)

2020-01-28 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Drew, currently you have Maintainer permissions in science-team. Shouldn't this be sufficient to do the said operations? I admit this move and forking stuff you described is too complex for me and I'm afraid I might do something wrong. In general I personally do not see any advantage in subgr

Re: Python3 Port of ModelBuilder

2020-01-28 Thread Andreas Tille
On Mon, Jan 27, 2020 at 04:50:17PM -0500, Scott Talbert wrote: > On Tue, 3 Dec 2019, Andreas Tille wrote: > > > if someone will show interest by writing an autopkgtest (or would > > provide some test script to prove the functionality which I'd > > volunteer to turn

Help for issues with lazyarray needed

2020-03-05 Thread Andreas Tille
Control: tags -1 pending Hi, I have updated lazyarray in Git[1] (by moving it to Debian Science team). The old package was lagging way behind upstream and a Python3 port is available by upstream so I just create the python3-lazyarray package fixing the open bugs. Unfortunately there is an open

Re: Help for issues with lazyarray needed

2020-03-05 Thread Andreas Tille
On Thu, Mar 05, 2020 at 02:27:13PM +0530, Nilesh Patra wrote: > > I had tried this, > I think Passing [:-1] in the mask2 initialisation would fix this. We also > need to cast this into a numpy array. > ... > > I'll try this by midnight today. If I can, I'll try a fix for this, and > make a MR, or

Please push changes of qelectrotech 1:0.7.0-1 to Git repository

2020-03-06 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Martin, when I went through some merge requests (also from you) I realised that there is even a new upload of qelectrotech but its not pushed to Git. Can you please push? Kind regards Andreas. PS: I have **NO** interest in this specific package at all - I was just astonished about the l

Re: Please push changes of qelectrotech 1:0.7.0-1 to Git repository

2020-03-06 Thread Andreas Tille
On Fri, Mar 06, 2020 at 11:52:39PM +0100, Martin wrote: > On 2020-03-06 12:10, Andreas Tille wrote: > > when I went through some merge requests (also from you) I realised > > that there is even a new upload of qelectrotech but its not pushed > > to Git. Can you please push?

Re: Please push changes of qelectrotech 1:0.7.0-1 to Git repository

2020-03-07 Thread Andreas Tille
On Sat, Mar 07, 2020 at 01:01:41PM +0100, Martin wrote: > Isn't that DEP-14 branch layout more or less? > > > Per Debian Science policy branch upstream (missing here) > > contains the upstream source and branch master contains the Debian > > packaging. > > Oops, I missed that. Yes, the name shoul

Possibly help from Debian Science team for streamlit needed (Was: COVID-19 Biohackathon April 5-11 2020)

2020-03-20 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi folks, On Tue, Mar 17, 2020 at 06:42:26AM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote: > > You know, I am after bcbio for two years now. It is deeply frustrating. > > It is not much better for other sequencing pipelines. How many packages > > will we be talking about? 20? 30? 50? 100? > &

Re: HELP needed for uploading a new upstream version of the Rheolef package

2020-03-23 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Pierre, sorry, I'm flooded with work - please find some other sponsor from Debian Science project. Currently I can only support Covid-19 related packages (which we try to assemble in Debian Med team currently) Thanks a lot for your understanding Andreas. On Sun, Mar 22, 2020 at 10:47

Re: HELP needed for uploading a new upstream version of the Rheolef package

2020-03-23 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Pierre, On Mon, Mar 23, 2020 at 04:24:13PM +, Pierre Saramito wrote: > > Let me known if I could help the Debian Med team ? > I remain "confined" at home, but I could help (test pkg, ect) ? We'll about to post an announcement for the upcomming virtual COVID-19 hackathon. I admit I could

Re: [GSoC] BLAS/LAPACK Ecosystem Enhancement for Debian

2020-03-29 Thread Andreas Tille
On Thu, Mar 26, 2020 at 02:46:58PM +, Mo Zhou wrote: > Hi science team, > > As discussed before, thanks to google, I'm participating GSoC this year > and I'll work to improve our BLAS/LAPACK ecosystem. Details can be found > in my GSoC proposal document: > > https://people.debian.org/~lumin

Re: Missing dependancies for streamlit

2020-04-07 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Rebecca, On Tue, Apr 07, 2020 at 08:56:45AM +0100, Rebecca N. Palmer wrote: > tensorflow 1.10 was packaged in experimental, but with reduced performance, > and was removed because this was considered not worth it: > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=935769 Ah I simply forgot th

Re: Missing dependancies for streamlit

2020-04-07 Thread Andreas Tille
On Tue, Apr 07, 2020 at 11:15:17AM +0100, Rebecca N. Palmer wrote: > A potential workaround for testing: while package builds (including > build-time tests) are not allowed to use the network, autopkgtests *are* > allowed to => skip the tensorflow-needing tests in build, but run them (with > tensor

[covid-19] Reviving tensorflow packaging effort (Was: Missing dependancies for streamlit)

2020-04-08 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Mo, On Wed, Apr 08, 2020 at 02:46:06AM +, Mo Zhou wrote: > On Tue, Apr 07, 2020 at 11:49:07AM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote: > > On Tue, Apr 07, 2020 at 08:56:45AM +0100, Rebecca N. Palmer wrote: > > > tensorflow 1.10 was packaged in experimental, but with reduced

Re: [covid-19] Lots of JS dependencies [Was: Missing dependancies for streamlit]

2020-04-08 Thread Andreas Tille
On Wed, Apr 08, 2020 at 11:07:28AM +0300, mer...@debian.org wrote: > On 2020-04-08 07:50, Andreas Tille wrote: > > My experience from other languages made me perfectly expect this. > > Is there an ITP/RFP for streamlit? I would like to add blocking ITP bugs > for it in order t

Bug#956194: ITP: streamlit -- fast way to build custom ML tools

2020-04-08 Thread Andreas Tille
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Subject: ITP: streamlit -- fast way to build custom ML tools Package: wnpp Owner: Andreas Tille Severity: wishlist * Package name: streamlit Version : 0.56.0 Upstream Author : Streamlit Inc * URL : https://github.com/streamlit

[covid-19] shiny-server (Was: dependencies Re: ITP: streamlit)

2020-04-08 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Rebecca, On Wed, Apr 08, 2020 at 01:48:52PM +0100, Rebecca N. Palmer wrote: > It does (and eslint itself is one of the packages that we do have but > npm2deb can't find), but even ignoring build dependencies completely and > assuming we can use the plotly.js embedded in python3-plotly or > r-cr

Packages needing tensorflow

2020-04-11 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi, on my desk I have the following packages that would need tensorflow: https://github.com/rrwick/Deepbinner Relevant for epidemiologists https://spacy.io/ Relevant for bioinformatics https://github.com/streamlit/streamlit Relevant for epidemiologists (as Rebecca

Re: ITP: bazel -- Fast and correct automated build system by Google

2020-04-14 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Olek, On Tue, Apr 14, 2020 at 11:27:45AM -0400, Olek Wojnar wrote: > To those interested in Bazel in Debian: > ... > Looking forward to getting a good group of people together who can > contribute to this, to whatever extent they are able! while I doubt that I'll be of technical help to work o

Re: ITP: bazel -- Fast and correct automated build system by Google

2020-04-14 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi, Michael, On Tue, Apr 14, 2020 at 03:09:46PM -0400, Olek Wojnar wrote: > > I think that's what Mo Zhou was working on in [1]... > > I don't mean to dismiss your idea, it would be great to have tensorflow > available on a build system already available in Debian! I'm just thinking > that it ma

Re: using package tests

2020-04-21 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi, just a hint: In the Debian Med team we usually install all data that is needed for a test as example data and the test script also in /usr/share/doc/pkgname . So users can re-run the test script as a user example. Kind regards Andreas. -- http://fam-tille.de

Re: [covid-19] Reviving tensorflow packaging effort (Was: Missing dependancies for streamlit)

2020-04-25 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Mo, On Sat, Apr 25, 2020 at 10:20:32AM +, Mo Zhou wrote: > > Is there any COVID-19 package using pytorch blocked due to its absense? I admit I can not say without doing detailed research on the set of relevant packages[3] > A good news is that I've managed to strip the whole third_party

Re: [covid-19] Reviving tensorflow packaging effort (Was: Missing dependancies for streamlit)

2020-04-27 Thread Andreas Tille
On Mon, Apr 27, 2020 at 02:05:58AM +, Mo Zhou wrote: > On Sat, Apr 25, 2020 at 01:42:28PM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote: > > > Is there any COVID-19 package using pytorch blocked due to its absense? > > > > I admit I can not say without doing detailed research on the set

Welcoming Mo Zhou as GSoC student

2020-05-04 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi, I've got confirmation that Mo Zhou is accepted as GSoC student for the topic BLAS/LAPACK Ecosystem Enhancement for Debian I'm really happy that Mo is taking over this task and I could not imagine anybody more competent for this task. Mo, good luck for this time! I do not think that you

Re: PSPP removed from Debian

2020-05-06 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Friedrich, On Wed, May 06, 2020 at 03:51:34PM +0200, Friedrich Beckmann wrote: > Hi John, hi Andreas > > the debian science team did the last CVE patches and wanted to maintain > the package. I think the reason for removal is described here: > > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?b

Re: Progress in preparing the Bazel Build System for Debian (COVID-19 Biohackathon follow-up)

2020-05-06 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Thorsten, On Wed, May 06, 2020 at 05:15:04PM +0200, Thorsten Glaser wrote: > > Provides or something to make it clear? I saw changes to packages adding > > Or perhaps we need a webpage or wiki page generated by parsing the > Contents file and listing the matching Debian package for each class

Re: Maven packages in Debian (was Re: Progress in preparing the Bazel Build System for Debian (COVID-19 Biohackathon follow-up))

2020-05-13 Thread Andreas Tille
On Wed, May 13, 2020 at 08:33:07PM +0200, Thorsten Glaser wrote: > > I remember times when such a web page (actually some autogenerated text > > file) existed which was **extremely** helpful. I wished this would be > > back! > > > > > … I just volunteerd, didn’t I? > > Here you are: > > https://

Re: pspp 1.2.0-4 debian release

2020-05-15 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Friedrich, On Fri, May 08, 2020 at 06:58:22AM +0200, Friedrich Beckmann wrote: > > a) I tried to push the changes to the salsa repository but I am not >allowed to do so. Next time you will be able to any Debian Science package since I've added you to the science-team. :-) Thanks for your

Re: RFR: new lintian check: linkage-against-deprecated-libcblas

2020-05-20 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Mo, On Wed, May 20, 2020 at 06:02:59AM +, Mo Zhou wrote: > I'd like to request for review on a new lintian warning check. > https://salsa.debian.org/lintian/lintian/-/merge_requests/309 > > In the past we've confirmed that programs should not be linked against > libcblas.so when they can

Re: RFC: Changing the debian system default BLAS/LAPACK implementation

2020-06-16 Thread Andreas Tille
On Tue, Jun 09, 2020 at 11:11:33AM +, Mo Zhou wrote: > https://salsa.debian.org/science-team/lapack/-/blob/master/debian/shlibs.local > Here is the dependency template used by dpkg-shlibdeps when generating the > .deb files. > If we change the template, all the reverse dependency will have a >

Re: RFS ete

2020-07-03 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi, On Tue, Jun 30, 2020 at 12:01:59PM +0300, mer...@debian.org wrote: > On 2020-06-30 11:56, zhao feng wrote: > > To access further information about this package, please visit the > > following URL: > > > > https://mentors.debian.net/package/ete I'd love to sponsor any package that is releva

Re: RFS ete

2020-07-03 Thread Andreas Tille
On Fri, Jul 03, 2020 at 05:10:32PM +0300, mer...@debian.org wrote: > On 2020-07-03 13:50, zhao feng wrote: > > Thanks for your help. I can build the package on buster and bullyseye. > > Which distribution do you use? I find the version of softwares like > > python is quite new. > > The package fai

Re: RFS ete

2020-07-04 Thread Andreas Tille
On Sat, Jul 04, 2020 at 06:44:29PM +0800, zhao feng wrote: > > > By the way, packaging of 'ete3' seems to be ongoing in Debian Med team > > as well (adding Andreas in CC): > > https://salsa.debian.org/med-team/python-ete3. I suggest getting in > > touch with them to keep duplicate efforts minimal.

Re: Debian Science BoF, Debconf20

2020-07-04 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Anton, On Fri, Jul 03, 2020 at 09:44:40PM +0200, Anton Gladky wrote: > I am going to submit a proposal for a BoF (birds of feather) for a > DebConf20, where Debian Science Team members and other people can meet > and discuss topics, connected to the Debian Science and similar. > > If somebody

Re: RFS ete

2020-07-04 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi, On Sat, Jul 04, 2020 at 10:48:13PM +0800, zhao feng wrote: > > The package at > > > > https://salsa.debian.org/med-team/python-ete3 > > > > builds but is also not finished yet. I do not remember what had stopped > > me from finalising and uploading. Please checkout and moreover if you > > t

Sponsoring of coinor-csdp

2020-07-05 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Doug, for coinor-csdp I get the following lintian info: I: libsdp0: linked-with-obsolete-library libcblas.so.3 usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libsdp.so.0.0.0 N: N:This tag is currently only issued for libcblas.so. For an explanation, N:please continue below. N: N:The symbols in lib

Sponsoring of topcom

2020-07-05 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Doug, when attempting to sponsor topcom I get the lintian warnings: W: topcom source: national-encoding debian/TOPCOM-manual.html N: N:A file is not valid UTF-8. N: N:Debian has used UTF-8 for many years. Support for national encodings is N:being phased out. This file probably

Re: RFS ete

2020-07-05 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi, On Sun, Jul 05, 2020 at 06:13:36PM +0800, zhao feng wrote: > I have merged the work into https://salsa.debian.org/med-team/python-ete3 Thanks a lot for the merge. I was running routine-update to modernise packaging on it and added you to Uploaders (I guess Alba is lacking time for that packa

Re: Bug#963732: RFS ete

2020-07-05 Thread Andreas Tille
On Sun, Jul 05, 2020 at 07:49:41PM +0800, zhao feng wrote: > I have enabled the pipeline in one fork > https://salsa.debian.org/zhaofeng-shu33-guest/python-ete3/-/pipelines/153000 > and I think the build error does not exist any more. Yes, I've uploaded now. > > Finally I'm wondering whether the

Re: Bug#963732: RFS ete

2020-07-05 Thread Andreas Tille
On Mon, Jul 06, 2020 at 10:00:38AM +0800, zhao feng wrote: > > Uploaded. Unfortunately I realised to late that the python3-* > > dependencies are not resolved automatically. I've added these manually > > in Git and will upload with the source-only upload that is needed after > > the package is ac

Re: Package Zotero

2020-07-16 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Eric, On Sat, Jul 11, 2020 at 02:30:16PM -0400, Eric Brown wrote: > Hello, > > I'm reaching out to see if there is any interest in this group to revive > the package of the reference management software Zotero. Zotero used to be > packaged in Debian but an update broke the packaging. There wer

[OT] How to plot time series over weekly / monthly data

2020-07-27 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi, its a bit off topic here but I hope to get some links. For my talk at DebConf Online I want to analyse contributions on a monthly or weekly base and plot graphs (either with gnuplot or R - whatever I can find an easier solution with). I can generate the data from a postgresql database in wha

Re: [OT] How to plot time series over weekly / monthly data

2020-07-28 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Carsten, On Tue, Jul 28, 2020 at 08:42:15AM +0200, Carsten Aulbert wrote: > not sure if this really helps or if I am just misunderstanding your problem: > > fake data: > > for y in 201{7,8,9} 2020; do for m in {01..12}; do \ > echo "$y-$m $RANDOM"; done; done | tee /tmp/data.in > > fire up g

Re: [OT] How to plot time series over weekly / monthly data

2020-07-28 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi George, On Tue, Jul 28, 2020 at 07:35:11AM -0300, George N. White III wrote: > > Time-series plots just lead to questions about trends and seasonal patterns, > so you are better off starting with a package that can decompose a series > into seasonal patterns+trends+residual. > > For monthly d

Re: Should the pandas 1.x transition be forced (breaking python-biom-format and q2-demux/q2-types) or keep waiting?

2020-08-24 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Rebecca, On Sun, Aug 23, 2020 at 11:30:19PM +0100, Rebecca N. Palmer wrote: > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=950430 > > pandas 1.0 has been in experimental for 6+ months, because it breaks some of > its reverse dependencies: > > In testing: > #950924 python-feather-format (

Re: RFS: fflas-fpack

2020-09-04 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Doug, sorry for the long delay. On Sat, Aug 22, 2020 at 12:42:37PM +, Torrance, Douglas wrote: > On 8/15/20 5:55 PM, Doug Torrance wrote: > > I've packaged a new version of fflas-ffpack which temporarily fixes RC > > bug #967088 [1] by skipping a failing test until upstream can fix the >

Re: joining the science team to package spaCy & gensim

2020-09-04 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi, On Fri, Aug 28, 2020 at 07:57:22AM +, Mo Zhou wrote: > > I will do that, are there any guidelines for which team to use for > > specific packages or should I ask on the list(s) about it? > > No, there is no such guideline since debian science team reuses the > maintainer mail address (ali

Re: Introduction to causal dynamics

2020-09-04 Thread Andreas Tille
On Thu, Sep 03, 2020 at 10:25:00PM +0200, Anton Gladky wrote: > I have just added you into the Debian Science Group on salsa. > > Usually salsa is used to maintain the packaging stuff, but the upstream is > hosted mostly > on github/gitlab and similar. ... but typically we store the code of rele

Re: RFS: fflas-fpack

2020-09-07 Thread Andreas Tille
Uploaded. Thanks for your work on this, Andreas. On Fri, Sep 04, 2020 at 06:42:24PM +, Torrance, Douglas wrote: > On 9/4/20 3:42 AM, Andreas Tille wrote: > > sorry for the long delay. > > No worries! > > > I've checked this but the autopkgtest fai

Re: Introduction to causal dynamics

2020-09-08 Thread Andreas Tille
On Mon, Sep 07, 2020 at 10:11:53AM +, Ralph Alexander Bariz wrote: > Thats ok, then development will stay on my own gitlab instance and official > mirrors nonetheless are hosted by tuxfamily. > I just released v0.2 and would like to package it and push it to debian > repos. However I have no

Seeking netlib / blas advise (Was: gjh_asl_json package dependency)

2020-09-08 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi, I'm mentoring Andrei in a Debian Med MoM project[1] and recommended to ask here. It seems to make sense to put netlib / blas in the subject to attract the attention of those who know about this more directly. On Tue, Sep 08, 2020 at 01:56:21PM +0200, Andrei Rozanski wrote: > Hi All, > > >

Re: Tinyarray packaging

2020-09-28 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Christoph, I've done a source-only upload to enable testing migration. On Mon, Sep 21, 2020 at 06:50:10PM +0200, Steffen Möller wrote: > We can address bits together via skype or so if I was unclear or you get > stuck for whatever reason. Steffen, please avoid advertising of non-free software

Re: PolyML

2020-11-17 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Brett, On Mon, Nov 16, 2020 at 04:37:43PM -0600, Brett Gilio wrote: > PolyML has a new upstream release that has been out for awhile. Could be > get it bumped, i'd be happy to send a patch. I'm trying to understand > this whole process for contributing to Debian and it is admittedly a > little

[help] Error in hdmf possibly caused by hdf5 issue?

2020-12-01 Thread Andreas Tille
Control: tags -1 help Hi, the build log says: ... > == > FAIL: test_link_h5py_dataset_h5dataio_input > (tests.unit.test_io_hdf5_h5tools.H5IOTest) > -- > Traceb

Advent calendar bug squashing issue (Was: Bug#936609: cblas / gsl hint needed (Was: Bug#936609: Ported ghmm to Python3 but issues with clapack))

2020-12-05 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi folks, this issue is something for our advent calendar. Anybody with cblas knowledge? Kind regards Andreas. On Mon, Jan 27, 2020 at 10:55:25AM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote: > Hi again, > > with my last mail I wanted to express: H, to stupid to turn > this hint in

Re: Advent calendar bug squashing issue (Was: Bug#936609: cblas / gsl hint needed (Was: Bug#936609: Ported ghmm to Python3 but issues with clapack))

2020-12-05 Thread Andreas Tille
12:09, Andreas Tille wrote: > | this issue is something for our advent calendar. Anybody with cblas > | knowledge? > > I am the GNU GSL maintainer, and I at one point also worked a lot with the > Atlas and other LAPACK/BLAS packages. I think Mo may be wrong here: I did the > same app

Re: RFS: Geant 4

2020-12-07 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Stephan, seems nobody has supported your RFS so far which is a shame. On Fri, Nov 27, 2020 at 01:53:41PM +, Stephan Lachnit wrote: > Hi, > > I'm looking for a sponsor for Geant4, a physics simulation toolkit developed > from CERN. It can be used for simulating particle accelerators, medi

Re: RFS: Geant 4

2020-12-07 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Christian, On Mon, Dec 07, 2020 at 07:49:25PM +0100, Christian T. Steigies wrote: > > seems nobody has supported your RFS so far which is a shame. > > I guess the problem is not that nobody is interested in this, but others > have tried before, and there are some big problems: > > https://wik

vmtk does not build any more

2020-12-07 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi, vmtk is using Python3 in Git[1], but there are build issues with vtk7: ... cd /build/vmtk-1.4.0+dfsg/obj-x86_64-linux-gnu/vtkVmtk/ComputationalGeometry && /usr/bin/c++ -DITK_IO_FACTORY_REGISTER_MANAGER -DvtkvmtkComputationalGeometry_EXPORTS -I/build/vmtk-1.4.0+ dfsg/obj-x86_64-linux-gnu/

Re: vmtk does not build any more

2020-12-08 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi, On Tue, Dec 08, 2020 at 04:21:01AM +0800, Drew Parsons wrote: > First thing to try would be building against vtk9, which Anton recently > released for us. Thanks for the hint but switching to vtk9 leads to cmake errors: -- The imported target "vtkgdcmsharpglue" references the file "/usr/l

Bug#936609: cblas / gsl hint needed (Was: Bug#936609: Ported ghmm to Python3 but issues with clapack)

2020-12-17 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi again, any more hints how we finally can build ghmm? Kind regards Andreas. On Sat, Dec 05, 2020 at 04:52:14PM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote: > Hi Dirk, > > thanks for the hint but simply using gsl as is was done in this package > and now it does not build any more. Howe

[ROM] hyantesite: Please remove hyantesite since Uploader seems not active any more and several attempts to fix FTBFS issues have failed

2020-12-17 Thread Andreas Tille
Control: retitle -1 [ROM] hyantesite: Please remove hyantesite since Uploader seems not active any more and several attempts to fix FTBFS issues have failed Control: reassign -1 ftp.debian.org Hi ftpmasters, as the bug log shows several people who failed to fix FTBFS issues in this package have

Re: Shipping bibtex files

2021-01-27 Thread Andreas Tille
On Sat, Jan 23, 2021 at 06:59:13PM +0200, Andrius Merkys wrote: > > https://salsa.debian.org/gspr/hera/-/blob/2749a47cad5b1b25f4c5cd219db2db907bd4ddc7/debian/upstream/metadata > > Seems OK to me. I am not aware of any validation tool for d/u/metadata, In any case you should run `yamlling` on the

Paraview will not migrate to testing due to test issue on armhf

2021-02-19 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Alastair, in our Debian Med sprint I was checking migration issues of packages that were mentioned in our tasks. I stumbled upon paraview[1] which has a Debci issue for armhf[2]: ... Building dependency tree... Reading state information... Package python3-paraview is not available, but is ref

python-cython-blis package

2021-03-03 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Anastasiia, I've found your packaging for cython-blis on Salsa. Since I need this module as a new dependency for python-thinc I have polished it to what is considered the packaging style inside the Debian Science team (which also included to name the repository same as the source package - thu

Re: python-cython-blis package

2021-03-03 Thread Andreas Tille
On Wed, Mar 03, 2021 at 05:26:11PM +0100, Gard Spreemann wrote: > > Andreas Tille writes: > > > [1] https://salsa.debian.org/debian-science/python-cython-blis > > Hi, > > I think this is a typo. It should be > > https://salsa.debian.org/science-team/pyt

Re: python-cython-blis package

2021-03-03 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Mo and Paul, On Thu, Mar 04, 2021 at 02:31:19PM +0800, Paul Wise wrote: > On Thu, 2021-03-04 at 06:21 +, M. Zhou wrote: > > > the upstream holds a very negative attitude towards debian packaging. > > https://github.com/explosion/cython-blis/issues/32 > > I suggest you cease packaging this

Re: python-cython-blis package

2021-03-05 Thread Andreas Tille
On Fri, Mar 05, 2021 at 09:52:47AM +0800, Paul Wise wrote: > > It seems unlikely that upstream will have changed their mind, it > was only a few months ago when we had the discussion with them. I intend to draw it into a different audience[1] but not in the next week where I'm busy with real life

arrayfire update fails in configure step

2021-04-26 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi, I personally have no interest in arrayfire but I realised that the Debian packaged version depends clblas (and is the only remaining package that needs cblas and I would like to see it removed from Debian due to bug #949767) Thus I tried to upgrade arrayfire to the latest upstream version in

Re: arrayfire update fails in configure step

2021-04-27 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Aaron, On Mon, Apr 26, 2021 at 08:30:39AM -0400, Aaron M. Ucko wrote: > Andreas Tille writes: > > > /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lpthreads > > Thanks for posting a link to the full log! AFAICT, the actual errors > appear much earlier, on lines 1573-1593: > > C

Re: arrayfire update fails in configure step

2021-04-28 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Aaron, On Tue, Apr 27, 2021 at 08:14:10PM -0400, Aaron M. Ucko wrote: > Please try adding a build dependency on libclfft-dev and replacing > src/backend/opencl/CMakeLists.txt's inclusion of build_clFFT with a call > to > > find_package(clFFT) > > > Thanks a lot for your initial hint Thanks

Re: Bug#949767: arrayfire update fails in configure step

2021-04-29 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Gard, On Wed, Apr 28, 2021 at 06:08:25PM +0200, Gard Spreemann wrote: > >> > >> libclblast-dev ships > >> > >> /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/cmake/CLBLast/CLBlastConfig.cmake > >> > >> Notice that there's both "CLBLast" and "CLBlast" in there! I'll > >> investigate. > > > > Looks like an upstream

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >