Re: RFS: scram/0.11.6-1

Thanks Mattia, I think the fixed bugs are not critical to pull the package out of testing or unblock it. Regards, Olzhas On Sat, Feb 11, 2017 at 11:32 PM, Mattia Rizzolo <mat...@debian.org> wrote: > On Sat, Feb 11, 2017 at 10:27:56PM -0800, Olzhas Rakhimov wrote: > > this is m

Re: RFS: scram/0.11.6-1

On Sun, Feb 12, 2017 at 5:56 AM, Mattia Rizzolo <mat...@debian.org> wrote: > [ahem, top posting…] > > On Sun, Feb 12, 2017 at 05:50:22AM -0800, Olzhas Rakhimov wrote: > > I think the fixed bugs are not critical to pull the package out of > testing > > or unblock

RFS: scram/0.11.6-1

; Is there anything new I should know? Thanks all, Olzhas Rakhimov

Re: RFS: scram/0.11.6-1

On Sun, Feb 12, 2017 at 6:38 AM, Mattia Rizzolo <mat...@debian.org> wrote: > On Sun, Feb 12, 2017 at 06:26:09AM -0800, Olzhas Rakhimov wrote: > > Ok, let's keep it git only. I will delete the upload on mentors. > > Ok, please remember to ask again once stretch is out; it's un

Re: Sponsor upload request for new package scram

Hello, The current configuration for packaging is available on 'ppa-deb' branch of the scram repository at https://github.com/rakhimov/scram You can checkout it with: git clone --branch ppa-deb https://github.com/rakhimov/scram Thanks, Olzhas On Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 11:07 AM, Olzhas Rakhimov

Re: Sponsor upload request for new package scram

Hello James, Thanks for the prompt feedback. I reuploaded a revised version. On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 11:24 AM, James Clarke <jrt...@jrtc27.com> wrote: > Hi Olzhas, > > On 17 Nov 2016, at 18:48, Olzhas Rakhimov <ol.rakhi...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > Hello everyb

Re: Sponsor upload request for new package scram

Hello everybody, I uploaded a new version with the repository on alioth. I would like to hear your feedback. Thanks, Olzhas On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 7:30 PM, Olzhas Rakhimov <ol.rakhi...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hello, > I have re-uploaded with your feedback. > cdbs is gone. It looks

Re: Sponsor upload request for new package scram

tell what is wrong. Thanks, Olzhas On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 3:50 PM, James Clarke <jrt...@jrtc27.com> wrote: > > On 17 Nov 2016, at 20:00, Olzhas Rakhimov <ol.rakhi...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > Hello James, > > Thanks for the prompt feedback. I reuploaded a revi

Sponsor upload request for new package scram

Hello, I am new to packaging for debian. I would appreciate any feedback and sponsorship for this package: https://mentors.debian.net/package/scram ITP: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=842766 RFS: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=842884 Regards, Olzhas

Re: Sponsor upload request for new package scram

. There's no other code. I am not sure how to do it without cdbs, so any reference would be helpful. Thanks, Olzhas On Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 6:09 AM, Andreas Tille <andr...@an3as.eu> wrote: > Hi Olzhas, > > On Sun, Nov 13, 2016 at 03:04:28PM -0800, Olzhas Rakhimov wrote: > >

Re: Sponsor upload request for new package scram

: > >> Hi Olzhas, >> >> On Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 11:07:24AM -0800, Olzhas Rakhimov wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> Thanks for the help and feedback. >>> I have only a guest account on alioth, >>> and AFAIK I would need Debian developer to let me crea

Re: Sponsor upload request for new package scram

but still has this strange behavior. On Sun, Nov 20, 2016 at 2:12 PM, James Clarke <jrt...@jrtc27.com> wrote: > Hi Olzhas, > > On 19 Nov 2016, at 04:14, Olzhas Rakhimov <ol.rakhi...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > Hi James, > > > >> On Fri, Nov 18, 2016 at 10

Re: Sponsor upload request for new package scram

06, 2016 at 02:44:19AM -0800, Olzhas Rakhimov wrote: > > Indeed, the next bug-fix release is coming soon (hopefully by the end of > > this month). > > Now this is going to go to NEW, and it'll have to clear it by the 25th > of this month, otherwise your package won't be in te

Re: Sponsor upload request for new package scram

Mattia, Thanks for reviewing again. I corrected the changelog and uploaded the package. Regards, Olzhas On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 11:56 PM, Mattia Rizzolo <mat...@debian.org> wrote: > On Mon, Dec 12, 2016 at 03:55:55AM -0800, Olzhas Rakhimov wrote: > > I've released a

Re: Sponsor upload request for new package scram

since the last upload. I would appreciate anyone's review and sponsorship. Thank you all, Olzhas On Thu, Dec 8, 2016 at 2:16 PM, Olzhas Rakhimov <ol.rakhi...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hello everybody, the package has been uploaded! > Thanks Ghislain, Matttia, Andreas, and James for helpin

Re: Sponsor upload request for new package scram

Thanks Mattia, Indeed, the next bug-fix release is coming soon (hopefully by the end of this month). Regards, Olzhas On Tue, Dec 6, 2016 at 2:39 AM, Mattia Rizzolo wrote: > On Thu, Nov 24, 2016 at 08:20:13PM +, Mattia Rizzolo wrote: > > if nobody beats me (and I really

Re: RFS: scram/0.14.0-1

Hello, I ended up doing a nasty thing of merging the GUI and command-line into one package. It works for now (tested on Ubuntu). Also, I switched to static builds to free myself from configuring shared libs. I really wish there's some debhelper magic for CMake multi-binary builds. Olzhas ​

Re: RFS: scram/0.14.0-1

On Tue, Aug 1, 2017 at 6:10 AM, Mattia Rizzolo <mat...@debian.org> wrote: > On Tue, Aug 01, 2017 at 03:08:01PM +0200, Mattia Rizzolo wrote: > > On Mon, Jul 31, 2017 at 09:21:05PM -0700, Olzhas Rakhimov wrote: > > > There are two major changes since the last packaging: >

RFS: scram/0.15.0-1

to mentors ready to be reviewed. Thanks, Olzhas Rakhimov

Re: RFS: scram/0.14.0-1

On Sat, Aug 5, 2017 at 5:12 AM, Mattia Rizzolo <mat...@debian.org> wrote: On Wed, Aug 02, 2017 at 06:51:00AM -0700, Olzhas Rakhimov wrote: > > I explicitly listed 'to-be-installed' files in scram.install & > > scram-gui.install. Reuploaded > > Very well, so let's get

Re: RFS: scram/0.14.0-1

On Sun, Aug 6, 2017 at 2:20 AM, Mattia Rizzolo <mat...@debian.org> wrote: > On Sat, Aug 05, 2017 at 03:16:14PM -0700, Olzhas Rakhimov wrote: > > Probably, I have to learn how to do uploads to experimental. > > it's just about using "experimental" instead o

Re: RFS: scram/0.14.0-1

On Wed, Aug 2, 2017 at 6:12 AM, Mattia Rizzolo <mat...@debian.org> wrote: > On Tue, Aug 01, 2017 at 06:12:36PM -0700, Olzhas Rakhimov wrote: > > I ended up doing a nasty thing of merging the GUI and command-line into > one > > package. > > meh. > don't give up

Re: RFS: scram/0.14.0-1

On Sun, Aug 6, 2017 at 7:07 AM, Mattia Rizzolo <mat...@debian.org> wrote: > On Sun, Aug 06, 2017 at 03:18:11AM -0700, Olzhas Rakhimov wrote: > > It becomes a problem with multi-arch builds (executable with '--help' > > isn't available). > > Right, I keep forgettin

Re: RFS: scram/0.14.0-1

On Sun, Aug 6, 2017 at 2:52 PM, Mattia Rizzolo <mat...@debian.org> wrote: > On Sun, Aug 06, 2017 at 02:22:29PM -0700, Olzhas Rakhimov wrote: > > Should be good to go. > > Uploaded! > ​Thanks, Mattia!​

Re: RFS: scram/0.16.0-1

On Wed, Nov 22, 2017 at 2:34 AM, Sébastien Villemot <sebast...@debian.org> wrote: > Dear Olzhas, > > On Sat, Nov 18, 2017 at 06:28:12PM -0800, Olzhas Rakhimov wrote: > > > I need sponsorship to update the scram package. > > A notable packaging-related ch

RFS: scram/0.16.0-1

Hello, I need sponsorship to update the scram package. A notable packaging-related change from the previous release is that libxml++ is dropped in favor of libxml2. The alioth git is updated, and package is uploaded to mentors for review. Thanks, Olzhas Rakhimov

Re: RFS: scram/0.16.1-1

Thanks Sebastien! On Thu, Jan 4, 2018 at 1:01 PM, Sébastien Villemot wrote: > > > You may also want to fix this lintian message in the next upstream release: > > I: scram: spelling-error-in-binary usr/lib/scram/libscram.so algorith > algorithm > ​Hmm, I am grepping all

RFS: scram/0.16.2-1

. Regards, Olzhas Rakhimov

Re: RFS: scram/0.16.2-1

On Tue, Jan 16, 2018 at 11:34:01AM +0100, Sébastien Villemot wrote: > Thanks, looks good. > > However you forgot to push the pristine-tar branch, can you please do so? > Done. Olzhas

Re: RFS: scram/0.16.2-1

On Sun, Jan 14, 2018 at 11:50 AM, David Bremner wrote: > > If you can't build it on debian unstable, it's not ready for upload yet. > ​It should build just fine. I have it built on Ubuntu 17.10 and 18.04: https://launchpad.net/~rakhimov/+archive/ubuntu/scram It is just that

Re: RFS: scram/0.16.2-1

On Sun, Jan 14, 2018 at 12:28 PM, Sébastien Villemot wrote: > > Note that your versioned dependency on g++ (>= 7.1) is not working as you > want > (it won’t enforce the requirement that you have in mind. > > Since g++ has an epoch number (currently 4), what you want is g++

Re: RFS: scram/0.16.2-1

On Sun, Jan 14, 2018 at 09:45:20PM +0100, Sébastien Villemot wrote: > > About epochs in general: > > https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/#version > > About the current epoch of the g++ package: > > apt show g++ Thanks for guiding. > You may want to update the Vcs-* fields with the new

RFS: scram/0.16.1-1

Hi, This is a bug-fix release of scram package; there's no notable packaging changes. I would appreciate your sponsorship. I updated alioth repo and uploaded on mentors. ​Is there some salsa migration work to do, ​or is it going to be automated? ​Regards, Olzhas​