Le 29/05/2013 12:44, Ole Streicher a écrit :
> Package: sponsorship-requests
> Severity: normal
> X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-science@lists.debian.org
>
> Dear mentors,
>
> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "fitsverify"
Hi Ole,
package looks good. I couldn't find upstream's license and copyrig
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Le 29/05/2013 14:02, Ole Streicher a écrit :
> Hi Thibaut,
>
> Am 29.05.2013 13:44, schrieb Thibaut Paumard:
>> Le 29/05/2013 12:44, Ole Streicher a écrit :
>>> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "fitsver
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Uploaded.
Le 31/05/2013 12:19, Ole Streicher a écrit :
> Hi Thibaut,
>
> Am 29.05.2013 14:38, schrieb Thibaut Paumard:
>> I don't think the FTP master will let the package in with just
>> this short notice (so shor
Le 14/10/2013 11:12, Olе Streicher a écrit :
> Dear mentors,
>
> Since I didn't get response since three weeks, I am reposting my
> Requests For Sponsorship so that it does not get lost:
>
Hi Ole,
Sorry I thought your usual sponsor would help you here.
I should be able to start having a look n
Le 10/01/2014 11:27, Andreas Tille a écrit :
> Hi Ole,
>
> at first thanks for all your great work on astronomy packages.
>
> On Thu, Jan 09, 2014 at 10:41:42PM +0100, Ole Streicher wrote:
>> Dear all (astrophysicists, amateurs, scientists, other),
>>
>> there are now quite some people around tha
Le 15/01/2014 12:10, Olе Streicher a écrit :
> Andreas Tille writes:
>> But as I said, some IRC meeting might do as well for a very first thing.
>
> For me, a Sprint in Potsdam in March (as Steffen proposed) would be fine.
Hi,
I don't think I'll be able to travel to Potsdam in March. I can joi
Le 06/03/2014 14:39, Andreas Tille a écrit :
> Hi Thibaut,
>
> since I guess you will maintain this package in Debian Science team it
> would be great to CC this list (which I'm doing now).
>
Right, thanks for the reminder.
Regards, Thibaut.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-science-requ...
Hi,
Le 13/03/2014 10:08, Оlе Ѕtrеісhеr a écrit :
> The idea of a sprint is also on my mind; however I am afraid that there
> are still only very few people going to take part, and I feel still
> unsure on how to organize it.
A videocon would be in order.
> You are however right: it is the right
Hi,
Le 13/03/2014 13:24, Andreas Tille a écrit :
> But h, just let me try some provocation (after I have confirmed that
> I have most probably the very same negative attitude about this way to
> fool stupid people): Debian is about Free Software and technical
> perfectness. We have some pack
Le 13/03/2014 11:32, Оlе Ѕtrеісhеr a écrit :
> In the moment, I would not differ between users and developers, just
> like debian-science (which also has no -devel).
Just for the record, there is the debian-science-maintainers alioth list.
Kind regards, Thibaut.
signature.asc
Description: Ope
Le 13/03/2014 15:34, Оlе Ѕtrеісhеr a écrit :
> Thibaut Paumard writes:
>> I was thinking a developer-oriented address would be better for
>> semi-private discussions, but Alioth list archives are public anyway. At
>> least, that would avoid too much noise when discussing wi
Le 13/03/2014 16:14, Thibaut Paumard a écrit :
> Le 13/03/2014 15:34, Оlе Ѕtrеісhеr a écrit :
>> Thibaut Paumard writes:
>>> I was thinking a developer-oriented address would be better for
>>> semi-private discussions, but Alioth list archives are public anyway. At
>
Hi,
I hereby support creation of the debian-astro mailing list.
Kind regards, Thibaut.
Le 17/03/2014 21:51, Ole Streicher a écrit :
> Dear astronomy enthusiasts,
>
> please post to the bug <741...@bugs.debian.org> and express your
> interest in having the mailing list.
>
> Best regards
>
> Ol
Hi guys,
Do you need help fixing plplot and gnudatalanguage so they can reach
testing?
I think it would make sense to maintain them in a team, either
debian-science (CC:) or debian-astro.
Kind regards, Thibaut.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Le 26/03/2014 00:52, Axel Beckert a écrit :
> forwarded 725957 http://sourceforge.net/p/gnudatalanguage/bugs/594/
> kthxbye
>
> Hi,
Hi,
> Thibaut Paumard wrote:
>> Do you need help fixing plplot and gnudatalanguage so they can reach
>> testing?
>
> As documen
Le 02/04/2014 17:22, Tomasz Buchert a écrit :
> On 02/04/14 15:21, Andreas Tille wrote:
>> Hi Tomasz,
>>
>> I guess you might like to maintain this package in Debian Astro team.
> Hi Andreas,
> I totally agree, it is a great idea. Do I have to do something
> special about it?
> What about stellariu
the meaning of the Policy is that most of our packages should be of
Priority "optional" and our Science Policy is sort of wrong.
That's what I have thought for a couple of years now, and I'm glad you
bring the matter.
Kind regards, Thibaut.
--
* Dr Thibaut Paumard |
this should work even if the tools call one
another. Another is that users can also set their own path and drop the
prefix.
Kind regards, Thibaut.
--
* Dr Thibaut Paumard | LESIA/CNRS - Table équatoriale (bât. 5) *
* Tel: +33 1 45 07 78 60 | Observatoire de Paris - Section de
(CC: debian-science)
Le 23/09/2014 22:26, Andrew Ross a écrit :
>
> Thibat,
>
> I have now uploaded a new version 5.10.0+dfsg-1 to mentors.debian.net.
> This the serious outstanding bugs, other than the Ada problem, which
> I believe is a transient issue related to gnat rather than a plplot
>
Le 24/09/2014 11:25, Thibaut Paumard a écrit :
> (CC: debian-science)
>
> Le 23/09/2014 22:26, Andrew Ross a écrit :
>>
>> Thibat,
>>
>> I have now uploaded a new version 5.10.0+dfsg-1 to mentors.debian.net.
>
> I'm building it right now.
Uplo
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-science@lists.debian.org,
debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org
* Package name : python-pyorick
Version : 1.4
Upstream Author : Dave Munro
* URL : https://github.com/dhmunro/pyorick
* License : BSD 2-Clause
Description :
The pyorick package
Dear all,
As I am moderating the debian-astro-commits mailing lists, which
receives all or git commits, I often see large or very large commit
messages.
The limit is currently set to 40KB. I think I should increase the limit
to at least 200KB, and still allow manually larger messages which are
no
Hi,
I'm working on autopkgtest support in one of my packages, gyoto.
The upcoming upstream release (preview available on our alioth git repo)
features MPI parallelisation, and I want to test this feature.
In my experience, running MPI code requires network access. Failing
that, openmpi hangs the
anonscm.debian.org/cgit/debian-science/packages/liggghts.git/tree/debian/tests/heat
> [3]
> https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/debian-science/packages/liggghts.git/tree/debian/tests/packing
>
> Best regards
>
> Anton
>
> Anton
>
>
> 2015-05-23 10:41 GMT+02
Dear all,
Last year I had trouble writing autopkgtest tests that would run
smoothly in a container. It seems that recent changes in openmpi have
broken it again.
This is what worked last year:
Le 26/05/2015 à 10:07, Johannes Ring a écrit :
> On Sat, May 23, 2015 at 7:10 PM, Thibaut Paum
t;
Dear Alastair,
I have seen this thread. The tests done manually for sure were not run
under fakeroot. I don't know for sure whether autopkgtest invokes
fakeroot, but I doubt it.
Kind regards, Thibaut.
> regards
>
> Alastair
>
>
>
> On 04/10/2016 17:09, Thibaut P
Dear Andreas,
All my packages should really go to astronomy. Two sets of packages I
would hide in any case, the last one would need to fit in the right task
in the astronomy blend.
(python|python3|yorick)-pyorick hide
yorick-mira should go to astronomy
(python|python3|yorick)-svipc hide
Kind reg
Dear Andreas,
Le 05/01/2017 à 14:39, Andreas Tille a écrit :
> Since this script has the logic to check whether a package that is
> maintained by the Debian Science team is mentioned in Debian Science
> tasks the best way to do the exclusion would be rather if you move your
> packages into Debian
Le 24/01/2018 à 10:54, Alastair McKinstry a écrit :
Hi,
I propose to change the Maintainer: for mpich from "Debian Science
Maintainers" which is an Alioth list, to debian-...@lists.debian.org.
Any comments or objections?
Dear Alastair,
I would prefer to have all Debian Science package-relate
Le 24/01/2018 à 15:54, Drew Parsons a écrit :
On Wed, 2018-01-24 at 16:15 +0300, Boris Pek wrote:
I propose to change the Maintainer: for mpich from "Debian
Science
Maintainers" which is an Alioth list, to debian-hpc@lists.debian
.org.
Any comments or objections?
I would prefer to have
Le 24/01/2018 à 16:14, Sébastien Villemot a écrit :
Fair enough, but I would still prefer to keep a single Maintainer address
for the many science packages. What should this address be?
It could be:
team+debian-science-maintain...@tracker.debian.org
Packages with this email will be automati
Dear fellow developpers,
I recently tried to convert a package from the old, manual -dbg package
scheme to the new, automatic -dbgsym package scheme. I get this reject,
below. Do you have any clue what I'm doing wrong?
Le 07/02/2018 à 11:22, Debian FTP Masters a écrit :
yorick-dbgsym_2.2.04
Le 12/02/2018 à 13:35, Sébastien Villemot a écrit :
Hi Thibaut,
On Mon, Feb 12, 2018 at 01:27:00PM +0100, Thibaut Paumard wrote:
I recently tried to convert a package from the old, manual -dbg package
scheme to the new, automatic -dbgsym package scheme. I get this reject,
below. Do you have
Le 07/11/2019 à 15:08, Matthias Klose a écrit :
> [1] https://wiki.debian.org/Python/Python3.8.
Thanks Matthias.
I've added the following point to "common upstream issues":
* Embedding Python: modules are not linked with libpython3.8 anymore,
but programs that embed Python still need to link wi
Le mardi 16 mai 2006 à 12:14 -0700, JD Rogers a écrit :
> That said, I think we should not overly subdivide. If the menu depth
> gets too large, we will be spending more time clicking menu levels
> than scanning a menu list for the app name. For example in my
> experience, I may have a couple of as
tly thinking of whether to separate it and how to do that in a
headache-minimising way. (The package was built as "native" up to now).
Thanks for your time and attention,
Best regards, Thibaut.
Le jeudi 25 mai 2006 à 12:43 +0200, Thibaut Paumard a écrit :
> Some more information:
>
On Fri, 24 Nov 2006 18:52:14 +0100
Vanuxem Gregory <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Le vendredi 24 novembre 2006 à 14:33 +0100, Christophe Prud'homme a
> écrit :
> > [ jeudi 23 novembre 2006 21:11 Vanuxem Gregory ]
> > | > Debian Developer - http://people.debian.org/~prudhomm/
> > | > Scienfific comp
Le 18 janv. 07 à 22:31, Christian T. Steigies a écrit :
On Wed, Jan 17, 2007 at 12:33:09PM +0100, aetherlux wrote:
Hi everybody,
I opened the ITP for gnudatalanguage about two years ago. [...]
afaik, the versions built by Sergio and Heimy has a lack, they
don't have save/re
store support
Le 27 août 07 à 08:04, Andreas Tille a écrit :
* The `-astronomy' package should also depend on what-ever
implementation that exists in Debian of `IDL' (Interactive
Data
Language). For some odd reason, that language seems popular
among astrologists - sorry astrono
Le 28 août 07 à 16:02, Christian Holm Christensen a écrit :
On Tue, 2007-08-28 at 14:34 +0200, Thibaut Paumard wrote:
Le 27 août 07 à 08:04, Andreas Tille a écrit :
* The `-astronomy' package should also depend on what-ever
...
while the later contains developent libraries etc
Hi,
I maintain a bunch of related packages. Yorick is an interpreter
specialized in number crunching and data analysis. I also maintain
extension packages which either extend the capabilities of Yorick
(plug-ins, interpreted libraries) or use Yorick to do something
specific (graphical dat
Hi,
I am about to upload a new package which build-depends on mpi-default-
dev (it will need to be checked by a sponsor and then go through NEW).
It it ok to do so in the next couple of days or should I wait for the
new mpi-default-dev?
Regards, Thibaut.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debia
Hi,
I am building a new package against mpi-default-dev.
If I understand correctly, mpi-default-dev just pulls either openmpi-
dev or lam-dev (to be replaced soon by mpich2-dev...) and trusts the
alternatives system to install the right links as mpicc etc.
I think that this currently does n
Hi,
Thanks for your answer.
Le 23 mars 10 à 11:22, Lucas Nussbaum a écrit :
I think that this currently does not work reliably since mpich2 has
the same priority (40) as openmpi for the alternatives system. If
package A build-depends on mpi-default-dev and is built on a machine
where mpich2-dev
Hi,
Le 23 mars 10 à 12:03, Lucas Nussbaum a écrit :
Most buildds have been migrated to using schroot with LVM snapshots,
so
it is no longer an issue on those buildds.
I didn't realize that.
- my preferred solution: mpi-defaut-dev could provide links like
mpicc.mpi-defaults that would be t
Hi,
Le 23 mars 10 à 19:01, Manuel Prinz a écrit :
To comment on the discussions you had: The problem Thibaut mentions
only
exists on the platforms where both implementations exist and mpich2 is
installed later into a buildd chroot.
Actually, I was wrong about that: from toying around with t
Hi,
Le 23 mars 10 à 19:40, Lucas Nussbaum a écrit :
I think that the best way to solve this problem is to explicitely
conflict with the other implementations in mpi-defaults. I don't see
any
other solution that really fixes the problem we are having and doesn't
require an upload of all packa
Hi again,
Le 23 mars 10 à 11:22, Lucas Nussbaum a écrit :
other solution:
- ensure (in mpi-defaults' postinst) that mpicc points to the correct
binary.
Having thought about it, I also think this is wrong: the idea behind
update-alternatives is that only the admin may set the alternative
m
Hi again,
Le 24 mars 10 à 10:30, Lucas Nussbaum a écrit :
Is it what will happen in practice? I'm afraid that the opposite
will happen: dpkg may well refuse to install the new package because
a conflicting package is already installed. I believe what we want
to do requires a combination of Confl
Le 24 mars 10 à 13:58, Thibaut Paumard a écrit :
- solution 1: make mpi-default-dev conflict against the non-default
MPI implementations.
[...]
- solution 2: implement mpicc-default et al. links, install them as
alternatives for mpicc et al. with high priority.
[...]
- solution 3: raise
be glad if someone uploaded this package for me.
Kind regards,
Thibaut Paumard
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Hi Sylvestre,
Le 30/09/11 01:06, Sylvestre Ledru a écrit :
> Le jeudi 29 septembre 2011 à 22:24 +0200, Thibaut Paumard a écrit :
>> Dear mentors,
>>
>> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "yorick".
>>
>> I have maintained the Yorick packages
Le 13/03/12 15:18, Yves S. Garret a écrit :
> Hi,
>
>I'm reading a book called nanotechnology for dummies. I'd like to
> know more about this field,
Hi,
Note that this list is about software, not science per se... Although
you might meet people here who are knowledgeable or even experts in
Le 12/04/12 12:50, Gerber van der Graaf a écrit :
> Hi, for packaging freefoam-user-doc I intend to include the static file
> UsersGuide.pdf.gz as asymptote is currently broken.
> (http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=668286)
> Also, generating the manual pages for the freefoam package
Le 16/04/12 13:17, Christophe Prud'homme a écrit :
> All,
>
> buildd failed on ia64 for feel++ (-4) due to lack of disk space.
> Is there another way than uploading -5 ?
>
> Best regards
> C.
Yes there is. You must send an e-mail to debian-release asking to
"give-back" your package.
Please r
Le 16/04/12 13:29, Thibaut Paumard a écrit :
> Le 16/04/12 13:17, Christophe Prud'homme a écrit :
>> All,
>>
>> buildd failed on ia64 for feel++ (-4) due to lack of disk space.
>> Is there another way than uploading -5 ?
>>
>> Best regards
>> C
> BTW, it would be really cool if *any* developer of a
> scientific application would check *now* whether its
> package is mentioned in the Debian Science tasks.
Hi,
Can you please add the following packages to the astronomy task?
yorick-mira
yorick-spydr
yorick-yao
(I'm a DM)
Regards, Thibaut
Le 12/06/12 11:36, Andreas Tille a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 10:48:19AM +0200, Thibaut Paumard wrote:
>> Can you please add the following packages to the astronomy task?
>>
>> yorick-mira
>> yorick-spydr
>> yorick-yao
>
> This make
Le 12/06/12 13:32, Andreas Tille a écrit :
> Without having the slightest idea about yorick this somehow smells like
> it might make sense to create a metapackage which installs all yorick
> plug-ins in one rush. We could in turn make the science-astronomy
> metapackage suggesting this.
I have th
Hi guys,
it's been two months since I initially posted this RFS, and the release
is getting nearer...
Regards, Thibaut.
Le 26/05/12 11:05, Thibaut Paumard a écrit :
> Le 08/05/12 09:43, Thibaut Paumard a écrit :
>> Hi guys,
>
>> I'd love it if someone could
Hi,
Could someone have a look at this 2-month-old RFS?
Kind regards, Thibaut.
Le 19/04/12 11:35, Thibaut Paumard a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> I've updated the package which now installs the headers in a
> subdirectory of /usr/include:
>
> http://mentors.debian.n
Dear Andreas (and other prospective mentors),
Andreas Tille wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 01:56:14PM +0200, Thibaut Paumard wrote:
> > I have thought about it before and I think it is a good idea. The main
> > problem is I would need to find a sponsor for that upload sinc
Le 13/06/12 21:43, Andreas Tille a écrit :
> Hi Thibaut,
>
>> To access further information about this package, please visit the
>> following URL:
>>
>> http://mentors.debian.net/package/yorick
>>
>>
>> Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:
>>
>> dget
Le 14/06/12 10:01, Andreas Tille a écrit :
> On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 10:50:54PM +0200, Thibaut Paumard wrote:
>>>> Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:
>>>>
>>>> dget -x
>>>> http://mentors.debian.net
Hi,
Le 17/06/12 00:07, Andreas Tille a écrit :
> On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 04:14:07PM +0200, Thibaut Paumard wrote:
>>
>> - Yorick is only distributed from github (no distinct tarballs, just
>>git tags). It has to be repackaged to meet the DFSG. What I was
>>e
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Le 18/06/12 11:06, Thibaut Paumard a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> Le 17/06/12 00:07, Andreas Tille a écrit :
>> On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 04:14:07PM +0200, Thibaut Paumard wrote:
>>>
>>> - Yorick is only distributed from githu
Dear Andreas et al.,
Le 14/06/12 10:01, Andreas Tille a écrit :
> On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 10:50:54PM +0200, Thibaut Paumard wrote:
>>>> Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:
>>>>
>>>> dget -x
>>>>
Le 21/06/12 11:33, Andreas Tille a écrit :
> On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 06:38:06PM +0200, Thibaut Paumard wrote:
>> I have now pushed Yorick to Alioth.
>>
>> I happen to have uncovered a severity=important bug:
>> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=678276
&g
Hi,
I have sent these two RFS a little bit more than two months ago. I have
put a lot of effort into them (for instance I've worked with upstream to
fix bugs in yp-svipc and port it to Python 3) and I'd be sorry if they
missed Wheezy for lack of a sponsor.
yp-svipc: System V InterProcess Communic
Dear Andreas,
Le 25/06/12 17:58, Andreas Tille a écrit :
> Hi Thibaut,
>
> On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 11:58:26AM +0200, Thibaut Paumard wrote:
>> I have sent these two RFS a little bit more than two months ago.
>
> I'm afraid that these packages will not make it any more
Le 25/06/12 19:06, Thibaut Paumard a écrit :
> Dear Andreas,
>
> Le 25/06/12 17:58, Andreas Tille a écrit :
>>> gyoto: General relativistic geodesic integration and ray-tracing
>
>> Moreover I do see some room for enhancement for this package. I wonder
>> whet
Dear fellow Debian Scientists,
After some discussion on this list, I'm trying to move all of the Yorick
packages to team maintenance within the science team. This involves one
upload per package with little changes to comply with the debian science
policy.
Most of this I can do on my own, but two
uts yorick-av in compliance with the debian-science
team like the rest of the Yorick packages.
* Package name: yorick-av
Version : 0.0.1-2
Upstream Author : Thibaut Paumard
* URL : http://paumard.github.com/yorick-av/
* License : permissive
Section
Le 29/06/12 11:37, Andreas Tille a écrit :
> Hi Thibaut,
>
> I once started helping you with this and I could do the upload of these
> two packages as well. However, I can and will not promise that I will
> reach the freeze deadline. So if you might find some other volunteer who
> might spare so
ian/rules with short dh notation
* Fortify (don't rely on yorick to provide right flags)
Regards,
Thibaut Paumard
-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-2-686
: "conflicting
+types for semtimedop"" (Closes: #679919). Involves a patch for the
+Python modules (fix_679919_kFreeBSD_FTBFS) and passing PKG_CFLAGS when
+building the Yorick plug-in.
+
+ -- Thibaut Paumard Wed, 11 Jul 2012 13:41:39 +0200
+
yp-svipc (0.14-1) unstab
Le 20/07/12 13:46, Andreas Tille a écrit :
> Hi Ole,
>
> in which Debian Science task(s) would this fit according to your
> opinion? I'd volunteer to put this into the proper task file if you do
> not want to dive into this yourself, but some hint would help
>
Hi,
I have replaced the "fv" stan
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Le 21/07/12 13:38, Jerome BENOIT a écrit :
> Hello:
>
> On 19/07/12 16:13, Jerome BENOIT wrote:
>> On 18/07/12 11:22, Thibaut Paumard wrote:
>>> Le 18/07/12 10:40, Jerome Benoit a écrit :
>>>> I am looking for a
78 matches
Mail list logo
