Re: Bug#963732: RFS ete

2020-07-05 Thread Andreas Tille
On Mon, Jul 06, 2020 at 10:00:38AM +0800, zhao feng wrote: > > Uploaded. Unfortunately I realised to late that the python3-* > > dependencies are not resolved automatically. I've added these manually > > in Git and will upload with the source-only upload that is needed after > > the package is ac

Re: Bug#963732: RFS ete

2020-07-05 Thread zhao feng
Thanks a lot! > Uploaded. Unfortunately I realised to late that the python3-* > dependencies are not resolved automatically. I've added these manually > in Git and will upload with the source-only upload that is needed after > the package is accepted. To run the unittest we need some more depen

Re: Bug#963732: RFS ete

2020-07-05 Thread Andreas Tille
On Sun, Jul 05, 2020 at 07:49:41PM +0800, zhao feng wrote: > I have enabled the pipeline in one fork > https://salsa.debian.org/zhaofeng-shu33-guest/python-ete3/-/pipelines/153000 > and I think the build error does not exist any more. Yes, I've uploaded now. > > Finally I'm wondering whether the

Re: Bug#963732: RFS ete

2020-07-05 Thread zhao feng
Got it, thanks! I have enabled the pipeline in one fork https://salsa.debian.org/zhaofeng-shu33-guest/python-ete3/-/pipelines/153000 and I think the build error does not exist any more. > I also thin checking the DeprecationWarnings might be worth investigating. This may be related with some upst