Re: RFS ete

2020-07-05 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi, On Sun, Jul 05, 2020 at 06:13:36PM +0800, zhao feng wrote: > I have merged the work into https://salsa.debian.org/med-team/python-ete3 Thanks a lot for the merge. I was running routine-update to modernise packaging on it and added you to Uploaders (I guess Alba is lacking time for that

Re: RFS ete

2020-07-05 Thread zhao feng
I have merged the work into https://salsa.debian.org/med-team/python-ete3 Detail can also be checked from https://mentors.debian.net/package/python-ete3 On Sat, Jul 4, 2020 at 11:19 PM Andreas Tille wrote: > > Hi, > > On Sat, Jul 04, 2020 at 10:48:13PM +0800, zhao feng wrote: > > > The package

Re: RFS ete

2020-07-04 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi, On Sat, Jul 04, 2020 at 10:48:13PM +0800, zhao feng wrote: > > The package at > > > > https://salsa.debian.org/med-team/python-ete3 > > > > builds but is also not finished yet. I do not remember what had stopped > > me from finalising and uploading. Please checkout and moreover if you > >

Re: RFS ete

2020-07-04 Thread zhao feng
> The package at > > https://salsa.debian.org/med-team/python-ete3 > > builds but is also not finished yet. I do not remember what had stopped > me from finalising and uploading. Please checkout and moreover if you > talk next time about "ete packaging repositor" provide a link. :-) Thanks for

Re: RFS ete

2020-07-04 Thread Andreas Tille
On Sat, Jul 04, 2020 at 06:44:29PM +0800, zhao feng wrote: > > > By the way, packaging of 'ete3' seems to be ongoing in Debian Med team > > as well (adding Andreas in CC): > > https://salsa.debian.org/med-team/python-ete3. I suggest getting in > > touch with them to keep duplicate efforts

Re: RFS ete

2020-07-04 Thread zhao feng
> The package fails to build on clean sid chroot. Most likely some Python > dependencies are missing from debian/control. I have reproduced the problem both in gitlab ci (https://salsa.debian.org/zhaofeng-shu33-guest/ete/-/jobs/844865) and my local docker env (debian:sid). After verbosing pytest,

Re: RFS ete

2020-07-03 Thread Andreas Tille
On Fri, Jul 03, 2020 at 05:10:32PM +0300, mer...@debian.org wrote: > On 2020-07-03 13:50, zhao feng wrote: > > Thanks for your help. I can build the package on buster and bullyseye. > > Which distribution do you use? I find the version of softwares like > > python is quite new. > > The package

Re: RFS ete

2020-07-03 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi, On Tue, Jun 30, 2020 at 12:01:59PM +0300, mer...@debian.org wrote: > On 2020-06-30 11:56, zhao feng wrote: > > To access further information about this package, please visit the > > following URL: > > > > https://mentors.debian.net/package/ete I'd love to sponsor any package that is

Re: RFS ete

2020-07-03 Thread merkys
On 2020-07-03 13:50, zhao feng wrote: > Thanks for your help. I can build the package on buster and bullyseye. > Which distribution do you use? I find the version of softwares like > python is quite new. The package fails to build on clean sid chroot. Most likely some Python dependencies are

Re: RFS ete

2020-07-03 Thread zhao feng
Thanks for your help. I can build the package on buster and bullyseye. Which distribution do you use? I find the version of softwares like python is quite new. > 1. I am under the impression that the Python package should be named > 'ete3', not 'ete'. After installing the .deb package Python

Re: RFS ete

2020-07-02 Thread merkys
Hello, On 2020-07-02 17:23, zhao feng wrote: > ok, the warning has been fixed by 3.1.1-3 Thanks for fixing lintian issues. I have cloned your repository, tried to build it, and ran into the following problem: dh_auto_test -O--buildsystem=pybuild pybuild --test -i python{version} -p

Re: RFS ete

2020-07-02 Thread zhao feng
ok, the warning has been fixed by 3.1.1-3 On Thu, Jul 2, 2020 at 5:31 PM wrote: > > Hi, > > I have tried building the package from the packaging repository on > salsa, however, 'upstream' and 'pristine-tar' branches are missing > there. Could you please push them with 'salsa push' or 'git push

Re: RFS ete

2020-07-02 Thread merkys
Hi, I have tried building the package from the packaging repository on salsa, however, 'upstream' and 'pristine-tar' branches are missing there. Could you please push them with 'salsa push' or 'git push --all && git push --tags'? On 2020-07-02 11:03, zhao feng wrote: > feng@debian:~/ete$ lintian

Re: RFS ete

2020-07-02 Thread zhao feng
I have tried to reproduce the lintian error on my virtual machine but I can't. I do not know what's happening with the report from mentors.debian.net. feng@debian:~/ete$ lintian python3-ete_3.1.1-1.1_all.deb W: python3-ete: binary-without-manpage usr/bin/ete3 W: python3-ete:

Re: RFS ete

2020-06-30 Thread merkys
Hello, On 2020-06-30 11:56, zhao feng wrote: > To access further information about this package, please visit the > following URL: > > https://mentors.debian.net/package/ete mentors.debian.net report lintian errors for this package. These have to be addressed prior to sponsoring. Best