Re: Bug#945389: Tried to upgrade skimage to see whether #945389 is fixed but failed

2019-12-05 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Stefan, On Thu, Dec 05, 2019 at 10:18:01AM -0800, Stefan van der Walt wrote: > On Wed, 04 Dec 2019 09:53:03 +0100, Andreas Tille wrote: > > Hmmm, I think the Cython files are generated in the build I did. > > Sorry, I missed that! I saw at the bottom of the log: > > E AttributeError: type

Re: Bug#945389: Tried to upgrade skimage to see whether #945389 is fixed but failed

2019-12-05 Thread Rebecca N. Palmer
Stefan van der Walt wrote: One possibility is that NumPy was compiled with an older version of Cython:[...] Do you know how I can check the source files for the NumPy 1.17 build that is used here? Source: https://sources.debian.org/src/numpy/1:1.17.4-3/ Build log:

Re: Bug#945389: Tried to upgrade skimage to see whether #945389 is fixed but failed

2019-12-05 Thread Stefan van der Walt
Hi Andreas, On Wed, 04 Dec 2019 09:53:03 +0100, Andreas Tille wrote: > Hmmm, I think the Cython files are generated in the build I did. Sorry, I missed that! I saw at the bottom of the log: E AttributeError: type object 'skimage.feature.orb_cy.array' has no attribute '__reduce_cython__'

Re: Bug#945389: Tried to upgrade skimage to see whether #945389 is fixed but failed

2019-12-04 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Stefan, thanks a lot for your feedback. On Tue, Dec 03, 2019 at 12:38:24PM -0800, Stefan van der Walt wrote: > The problem here stems from an old version of Cython. My recommended > approach would be to build from the git tag instead of the source tarball > (i.e., the version without

Re: Bug#945389: Tried to upgrade skimage to see whether #945389 is fixed but failed

2019-12-03 Thread Stefan van der Walt
Hi Andreas and Ole, The problem here stems from an old version of Cython. My recommended approach would be to build from the git tag instead of the source tarball (i.e., the version without pre-generated Cython files). I don't think the Cython-related patches that were applied since would

Re: Tried to upgrade skimage to see whether #945389 is fixed but failed

2019-12-03 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Ole, I had a quick look what you mean and tried to make the build more standard[1]. The build issues are remaining and need some work. Kind regards, Andreas. [1] https://salsa.debian.org/science-team/skimage/commit/d787835f7293dc105b9b8cf37d59c1f9fbf46110 On Mon, Dec 02, 2019 at

Re: Tried to upgrade skimage to see whether #945389 is fixed but failed

2019-12-03 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Ole, On Mon, Dec 02, 2019 at 01:01:07PM +0100, Ole Streicher wrote: > Hi Andreas, > > I think that is the moment where the skimage build should be simplified > to the "official" build process: Python convention is that symbols > starting with an underscore are internal only (and ofcourse

Tried to upgrade skimage to see whether #945389 is fixed but failed

2019-12-02 Thread Andreas Tille
Control: tags -1 help Hi, I tried my luck with #945389 since two Debian Med packages are depending from skimage. So at first I tried to upgrade to the latest upstream version to possibly forward some reasonable bug report. Unfortunately the build starts very early: ... debian/rules build