How can I simply block all such attaches in Exim?
As I know there are no special conditions embedded in Exim.
And the only way to do it is to write your own filter
which parse mail body for attaches.
I think, it is not a good idea.
Can you offer easier way?
On Fri, 23 Nov 2001, Jason Thomas
On Fri, 2001-11-23 at 09:56, Dmitry N. Hramtsov wrote:
How can I simply block all such attaches in Exim?
As I know there are no special conditions embedded in Exim.
And the only way to do it is to write your own filter
which parse mail body for attaches.
I think, it is not a good idea.
* Mathias Gygax [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2001.11.18 17:58:46+0100]:
excellent. you know what i did: i just remove the root:0:... line from
/etc/passwd and /etc/shadow. now i can't be root. that must be perfect
security. yeah!
before you shout, think twice. this is READ-only on my system. you
hi ya
for the rest of the free anti-virus apps ( dozen or so )
http://www.linux-sec.net/Harden/server.gwif.html#Mail
c ya
alvin
On 23 Nov 2001, Laurent Luyckx wrote:
On Fri, 2001-11-23 at 09:56, Dmitry N. Hramtsov wrote:
How can I simply block all such attaches in Exim?
As I know
To check mail for viruses I use sendmail milter, which connect to (commercial)
antivirus program drweb. Both sendmail and drweb live on one debian linux host
(behind a firewall), and can connect to each other over Unix socket or TCP
socket. Ports for sendmail and drweb to communicate (in case
How can I simply block all such attaches in Exim?
As I know there are no special conditions embedded in Exim.
And the only way to do it is to write your own filter
which parse mail body for attaches.
I think, it is not a good idea.
Can you offer easier way?
On Fri, 23 Nov 2001, Jason Thomas
On Fri, 2001-11-23 at 09:56, Dmitry N. Hramtsov wrote:
How can I simply block all such attaches in Exim?
As I know there are no special conditions embedded in Exim.
And the only way to do it is to write your own filter
which parse mail body for attaches.
I think, it is not a good idea.
* Mathias Gygax [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2001.11.18 17:58:46+0100]:
excellent. you know what i did: i just remove the root:0:... line from
/etc/passwd and /etc/shadow. now i can't be root. that must be perfect
security. yeah!
before you shout, think twice. this is READ-only on my system. you
* Mathias Gygax [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2001.11.18 17:59:29+0100]:
thanks, you just made me laugh!
you set lamer detector to orange.
alright, so my first step is to scale back and *not* flame. i am sorry
for posting my sarcastic comment.
i shall now try to sum up my points. we have been talking
Hello
I have problems with my computer. I have Windows 98 SE nad Linux Debian
2.2.r4. Windows works ok, but in Linux i encountered strange errors on
filesystem. It's something like: inode #no. has invalid entry offset=4!=0
and then specification of this entry. I've also encountered errors like
hi ya
for the rest of the free anti-virus apps ( dozen or so )
http://www.linux-sec.net/Harden/server.gwif.html#Mail
c ya
alvin
On 23 Nov 2001, Laurent Luyckx wrote:
On Fri, 2001-11-23 at 09:56, Dmitry N. Hramtsov wrote:
How can I simply block all such attaches in Exim?
As I know
To check mail for viruses I use sendmail milter, which connect to (commercial)
antivirus program drweb. Both sendmail and drweb live on one debian linux host
(behind a firewall), and can connect to each other over Unix socket or TCP
socket. Ports for sendmail and drweb to communicate (in case
http://linuxtoday.com/news_story.php3?ltsn=2001-11-20-011-20-SC-HL-SV
-Message d'origine-
De : Alvin Oga [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Envoyé : 23 novembre, 2001 08:39
À : Laurent Luyckx
Cc : Dmitry N. Hramtsov; Jason Thomas; debian-security@lists.debian.org
Objet : Re: About virus scanners
Is anyone else having problems with the robot from
openfind.com.tw
-- an intrusive, irritating, hard-to-get-rid-of crawler that completely
paralyses my system *every day*?
Despite what I put in any robots.txt, this one disregards all rules and
just jams up my system, downloading every
Martin WHEELER [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Is anyone else having problems with the robot from
openfind.com.tw
-- an intrusive, irritating, hard-to-get-rid-of crawler that completely
paralyses my system *every day*?
Nope. How does it paralyse you, anyway?
Despite what I put in any
On Fri, Nov 23, 2001 at 05:32:04PM + or thereabouts, Martin WHEELER wrote:
Is anyone else having problems with the robot from
openfind.com.tw
...
Anyone know of a sure-fire robot killer under woody?
as a first recourse you could instruct your firewall to deny all access
from
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Martin == Martin WHEELER [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Martin Is anyone else having problems with the robot from
Martin openfind.com.tw
Martin -- an intrusive, irritating, hard-to-get-rid-of crawler that
Martin completely paralyses my system *every
## Martin WHEELER ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
Is anyone else having problems with the robot from
openfind.com.tw
That one has not been seen here.
Anyone know of a sure-fire robot killer under woody?
Apache himself (assuming your webserver runs apache, other servers
should have something
unsubscribe
Wichert Akkerman [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Previously Vineet Kumar wrote:
So are please and thank you, but it's generally considered polite.
Also using Mail-Followup-To is standard and expected behaviour on
debian lists.
That's a reasonable requirement only when Debian adds support for
On Fri, Nov 23, 2001 at 12:38:29PM -0800, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote:
Also using Mail-Followup-To is standard and expected behaviour on
debian lists.
That's a reasonable requirement only when Debian adds support for
Mail-Followup-To in all the MUA's that it supports.
Do we *support* MUAs?
The best way would be to block it at your router with an access list.
Blocking it at the box is ok too but that takes a little bit of your
resources. And you have to do it on each box on your network you want
protected. The router block will protect your entire network in one fell
swoop and cost
22 matches
Mail list logo
