Greets,
On Thu, 22 Aug 2002 at 01:57:32AM +0200, R?mi Letot wrote:
> I'd like to setup a VPN between two hosts on cable connection. The
> problem is that they have dynamic ip's, and none of the two sides is
> permanently up (most of the time they are up, but it's not guaranteed
> at all). Furtherm
On Thu, Aug 22, 2002 at 01:57:32AM +0200, R?mi Letot wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'd like to setup a VPN between two hosts on cable connection. The
> problem is that they have dynamic ip's, and none of the two sides is
> permanently up (most of the time they are up, but it's not guaranteed
> at all). Fur
Hi all,
I'd like to setup a VPN between two hosts on cable connection. The
problem is that they have dynamic ip's, and none of the two sides is
permanently up (most of the time they are up, but it's not guaranteed
at all). Furthermore, I can't be sure of which one will come up first
when they are
On Wed, Aug 21, 2002 at 12:20:27PM +0200, Marcel Weber wrote:
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Hi
>
> Does anybody know if there are any news concerning freeswan and
> Watchguard Firebox 2 interoperability? Some time ago I read that the two
> would not work together, as Watchguard does not use triple DES duri
Hi folks,
I presume many of you have heard of the following:
http://www.ethereal.com/appnotes/enpa-sa-6.html
Is the Debian package affected?
If the output is being read correctly ... It looks like something to do
with ??RSA?? Incidently, a Win2000 system running WinSCP works fine
with all computer1/computer2/server1 without any errors.
Teun Vink wrote:
On Wed, 21 Aug 2002, Hanasaki JiJi wrote:
computer1 and computer2 nfs mount
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I had the same problem when trying to scp from an openSSH
based machine to an F-Secure based SSH machine
I assumed it was some sort of protocol mismatch between
the two implimentations
Jan.
> computer1 and computer2 nfs mount home dirs
> from ser
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi
Does anybody know if there are any news concerning freeswan and
Watchguard Firebox 2 interoperability? Some time ago I read that the two
would not work together, as Watchguard does not use triple DES during
the negotiation phase. Is there a pa
are you in LAN or Internet connection
because if you have a MTU ( Maximum Tranmit Unit : cf ifconfig )or MSS (
Maximum Segmnet Size : cf iptables ) problem this can explain that
problem.
the SSH can pass but not the SCP or other program use it as rsync ,cvs
francois
On Wed, 2002-08-21 at 07:5
* Hanasaki JiJi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-08-21 07:58 +0200]:
> all can ssh to each other
> computer1 and computer2 cannot scp to/from eachother
though this is not related to debian-security and you should have posted
to debian-user or debian-ssh, you might want to check "ssh computer2 : ".
If the
On Wed, 21 Aug 2002, Hanasaki JiJi wrote:
> computer1 and computer2 nfs mount home dirs
> from server1
>
> all can ssh to each other
>
> computer1 and computer2 can scp to/from server1
>
> computer1 and computer2 cannot scp to/from eachother
>
> Any thoughts? Could this be related to the nfs
I'm sure freeswan can accept dynamic connections, with variable IP address.
FreeSwan has a Road Warrior mode, but it has some limitations.
Yous don't set the Road warrior side, you set only the IP address to 0.0.0.0.,
and set the keys. In this case the Road Warrior will initiate the
connection.
computer1 and computer2 nfs mount home dirs
from server1
all can ssh to each other
computer1 and computer2 can scp to/from server1
computer1 and computer2 cannot scp to/from eachother
Any thoughts? Could this be related to the nfs mounting of home dirs?
Thanks
13 matches
Mail list logo
