On Tue, Sep 24, 2002 at 10:32:03AM -0400, Noah L. Meyerhans wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 24, 2002 at 06:36:10AM -0400, Rishi L Khan wrote:
> > Are you sure that they portscanned you and not someone faking that IP?
>
> There'd have to be one *seriously* misconfigured router out there to
> allow such a thin
On Tue, Sep 24, 2002 at 11:09:59AM -0400, Todd Charron wrote:
> Thanks for the prompt reply.
>
> So putting an htaccess file in the root of the bugzilla dir (to control
> access by ip and through login/password) would be sufficient? I thought
> it might be, but wanted to make sure there weren't
Thanks for the prompt reply.
So putting an htaccess file in the root of the bugzilla dir (to control
access by ip and through login/password) would be sufficient? I thought
it might be, but wanted to make sure there weren't any other security
issues that I wasn't aware of with running it.
Thanks
On Tue, Sep 24, 2002 at 10:55:19AM -0400, Todd Charron wrote:
> I've recently been looking to setup bugzilla as a way to keep track
> of... well... bugs ;) Anyway, while setting it up I noticed it was
> recommended for security to set create htaccess to 1 so that proper
> .htaccess files can be
Hi,
I've recently been looking to setup bugzilla as a way to keep track
of... well... bugs ;) Anyway, while setting it up I noticed it was
recommended for security to set create htaccess to 1 so that proper
.htaccess files can be generated. However, I also noticed that doing
this on debian seem
On Tue, Sep 24, 2002 at 10:32:03AM -0400, Noah L. Meyerhans wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 24, 2002 at 06:36:10AM -0400, Rishi L Khan wrote:
> > Are you sure that they portscanned you and not someone faking that IP?
>
> There'd have to be one *seriously* misconfigured router out there to
> allow such a thi
On Tue, Sep 24, 2002 at 06:36:10AM -0400, Rishi L Khan wrote:
> Are you sure that they portscanned you and not someone faking that IP?
There'd have to be one *seriously* misconfigured router out there to
allow such a thing to work. Otherwise, they'd never get the results of
their portscan back.
On Tue, Sep 24, 2002 at 11:09:59AM -0400, Todd Charron wrote:
> Thanks for the prompt reply.
>
> So putting an htaccess file in the root of the bugzilla dir (to control
> access by ip and through login/password) would be sufficient? I thought
> it might be, but wanted to make sure there weren't
Thanks for the prompt reply.
So putting an htaccess file in the root of the bugzilla dir (to control
access by ip and through login/password) would be sufficient? I thought
it might be, but wanted to make sure there weren't any other security
issues that I wasn't aware of with running it.
Thank
On Tue, Sep 24, 2002 at 10:55:19AM -0400, Todd Charron wrote:
> I've recently been looking to setup bugzilla as a way to keep track
> of... well... bugs ;) Anyway, while setting it up I noticed it was
> recommended for security to set create htaccess to 1 so that proper
> .htaccess files can b
Hi,
I've recently been looking to setup bugzilla as a way to keep track
of... well... bugs ;) Anyway, while setting it up I noticed it was
recommended for security to set create htaccess to 1 so that proper
.htaccess files can be generated. However, I also noticed that doing
this on debian see
On Tue, Sep 24, 2002 at 06:36:10AM -0400, Rishi L Khan wrote:
> Are you sure that they portscanned you and not someone faking that IP?
There'd have to be one *seriously* misconfigured router out there to
allow such a thing to work. Otherwise, they'd never get the results of
their portscan back.
[Jean-Francois Dive wrote in newsgate.debian.security]
> There should not be any relationship between applying the patch and
> getting those symbols problem. The classical problem could be that
> you did not make clean before and after applying the patch.. (difference
> in the 2 kernel system.
Are you sure that they portscanned you and not someone faking that IP?
according to arin:
OrgName:Distributed Network Technical Support
OrgID: DNTS
NetRange: 198.175.98.0 - 198.175.98.255
CIDR: 198.175.98.0/24
NetName:INTEL-IT35
NetHandle: NET-198-175-98-0-1
Parent: NET
On Tue, 24 Sep 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
#
# I've been just properly scanned and whois is telling
# 198.175.98.0 is Distributed Network Technical Support (NET-INTEL-IT34),
# nothing more, who shall I contact then ;)
whois -h whois.arin.net NET-198-175-64-0-1
OrgName:Intel Corporati
On Mon, Sep 23, 2002 at 08:17:40AM +0200, Oliver Fuchs wrote:
>
> :0
> * ^Subject:.*unsubscribe$
> /dev/null
That will miss messages Re: unsubscribe. I use:
:0:
* ^Subject: (un)?subscribe$
unsub-idiots
--
#define X(x,y) x##y
Peter Cordes ; e-mail: X([EMAIL PROTECTED] , ns.ca)
"The god
I've been just properly scanned and whois is telling
198.175.98.0 is Distributed Network Technical Support (NET-INTEL-IT34),
nothing more, who shall I contact then ;)
Rene Skoba
also sprach Mark Janssen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002.09.24.0914 +0200]:
> I suggest you first read:
> http://home.rica.net/alphae/419coal/
>
> Which clearly describes the working of this scam... Just ignore it, or
> send it on to the relevant government agency...
I don't think that Brad was very se
[Jean-Francois Dive wrote in newsgate.debian.security]
> There should not be any relationship between applying the patch and
> getting those symbols problem. The classical problem could be that
> you did not make clean before and after applying the patch.. (difference
> in the 2 kernel system
Are you sure that they portscanned you and not someone faking that IP?
according to arin:
OrgName:Distributed Network Technical Support
OrgID: DNTS
NetRange: 198.175.98.0 - 198.175.98.255
CIDR: 198.175.98.0/24
NetName:INTEL-IT35
NetHandle: NET-198-175-98-0-1
Parent: NE
> I suggest you first read:
> http://home.rica.net/alphae/419coal/
>
> Which clearly describes the working of this scam... Just ignore it, or
> send it on to the relevant government agency...
>
He was being sarcastic... Everyone knows it's a scam..
We make new work shoes for importers:
www.wins-chinaboots.com
Regards,
Wentao
On Tue, 2002-09-24 at 09:07, Brad Corsello wrote:
>
> I propose that we accept Dr. Adams's proposal and use the windfall to fund
> Debian development. Who wants to put up the money for his "fees?"
>
> >From: "Dr. Kola Adams" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >Reply-To: "Dr. Kola Adams" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
I propose that we accept Dr. Adams's proposal and use the windfall to fund
Debian development. Who wants to put up the money for his "fees?"
From: "Dr. Kola Adams" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: "Dr. Kola Adams" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Subject: Business Proposal (Urgent)
Date: Tue, 24 Sep 20
On Tue, 24 Sep 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
#
# I've been just properly scanned and whois is telling
# 198.175.98.0 is Distributed Network Technical Support (NET-INTEL-IT34),
# nothing more, who shall I contact then ;)
whois -h whois.arin.net NET-198-175-64-0-1
OrgName:Intel Corporat
On Mon, Sep 23, 2002 at 08:17:40AM +0200, Oliver Fuchs wrote:
>
> :0
> * ^Subject:.*unsubscribe$
> /dev/null
That will miss messages Re: unsubscribe. I use:
:0:
* ^Subject: (un)?subscribe$
unsub-idiots
--
#define X(x,y) x##y
Peter Cordes ; e-mail: X([EMAIL PROTECTED] , ns.ca)
"The go
I've been just properly scanned and whois is telling
198.175.98.0 is Distributed Network Technical Support (NET-INTEL-IT34),
nothing more, who shall I contact then ;)
Rene Skoba
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROT
also sprach Mark Janssen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002.09.24.0914 +0200]:
> I suggest you first read:
> http://home.rica.net/alphae/419coal/
>
> Which clearly describes the working of this scam... Just ignore it, or
> send it on to the relevant government agency...
I don't think that Brad was very s
> I suggest you first read:
> http://home.rica.net/alphae/419coal/
>
> Which clearly describes the working of this scam... Just ignore it, or
> send it on to the relevant government agency...
>
He was being sarcastic... Everyone knows it's a scam..
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROT
We make new work shoes for importers:
www.wins-chinaboots.com
Regards,
Wentao
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
30 matches
Mail list logo
