-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
- --
Debian Security Advisory DSA 269-1 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.debian.org/security/ Martin Schulze
March 26th, 2003
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
- --
Debian Security Advisory DSA 270-1 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.debian.org/security/ Martin Schulze
March 27sh, 2003
Hi all,
On Tue, Mar 25, 2003 at 01:46:32PM -0600, Jones wrote:
One thing they forgot to mention was that they used Exchange for
email. That means instead of running exim, I will have to forward
SMTP POP traffic to their Exchange server. The Exchange server
will not be directly connected
hi,
I look at in the file /etc/passwd on my server today, and I saw the user
nobody has a shell !!. When I installed my debian (sarge, I know it's
bad, but it's just a server for me...) I put /bin/false. A few days ago,
while an upgrade, apt asked to me to upgrade that file to the new
version
On Wed, Mar 26, 2003 at 11:35:38AM +0100, Yoann wrote:
Hi,
I look at in the file /etc/passwd on my server today, and I saw the user
nobody has a shell !!. When I installed my debian (sarge, I know it's
bad, but it's just a server for me...) I put /bin/false. A few days ago,
while an
Does the user nobody has got a password in /etc/shadow ?
greets
Robbert
Citeren Yoann [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
hi,
I look at in the file /etc/passwd on my server today, and I saw the user
nobody has a shell !!. When I installed my debian (sarge, I know it's
bad, but it's just a server for
Hi,
I look at in the file /etc/passwd on my server today, and I saw the user
nobody has a shell !!. When I installed my debian (sarge, I know it's
bad, but it's just a server for me...) I put /bin/false. A few days ago,
while an upgrade, apt asked to me to upgrade that file to the new
version and
I would like to bind squid to a specific interface.
I thought the easy way to do this would be with xinetd, but I get:
Mar 26 06:05:09 localhost squid: Cannot open HTTP Port
Mar 26 06:05:49 localhost last message repeated 10 times
When I try to use it. Normally this would mean there is a
Yoann [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
there is an * in /etc/shadow for nobody, but all services (ftp, web...)
are running with the uid nobody so if there is an attack on an unknow
bug (I keep up to date all services) on those services (buffer overflow
for example), It's will be unsercure.. .
It
On Wednesday 26 March 2003 15:16, Michael West wrote:
Hi there,
how about :
http_port xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx:8000
tcp_outgoing_address xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx
udp_outgoing_address xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx
in the squid config and run squid as daemon ?
Michi
I would like to bind squid to a specific interface.
I
On Wed, Mar 26, 2003 at 12:11:58PM +0100, Sven Hoexter wrote:
Well yes it could :) As long as the user has no valid password it's not very
usefull. Take a look into the /etc/shadow and in the second field you'll find
! or * indicating that this user has a invalid password. See man 5 shadow.
Dit e-mail adres bestaat niet
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
## Michael West ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
I would like to bind squid to a specific interface.
http_port hostname:port
http_port ip:port
http_port port
It's documented.
Regards,
cmt
--
Spare Space
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
* Michael West [EMAIL PROTECTED] [26-03-03 15:16]:
I would like to bind squid to a specific interface.
Look at /etc/squid.conf:
# NETWORK OPTIONS
# -
# TAG: http_port
# Usage: port
#
Michael West wrote:
I would like to bind squid to a specific interface.
[...]
What am I doing wrong with xinetd? What other ways are there to make
squid bind to an interface?
IIRC there used to be an option tcp_incoming_adress in
/etc/squid.conf, but I think lately it was changed to be
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi all,
I guess this question might be more suited on gnupg-users, but as I'm
not subscribed to that list, I hope you can forgive me for asking
here... It is a really short question...
Is there a way to remove revoked/expired and otherwise invalid
On Wed, Mar 26, 2003 at 10:50:48AM -0500, Noah L. Meyerhans wrote:
On Wed, Mar 26, 2003 at 12:11:58PM +0100, Sven Hoexter wrote:
Well yes it could :) As long as the user has no valid password it's not very
usefull. Take a look into the /etc/shadow and in the second field you'll find
! or *
does anyone know what squid's udp sockets are for, and how to close
them? As far as I can tell, I don't need them, but I've been unable to
find a combination of squid directives to make them all go away. The icp
port can be closed using icp_port 0, but the other one is dynamic and
isn't referred
I believe that UDP port is for receiving DNS responses.
-Kevin
Jason Lunz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
does anyone know what squid's udp sockets are for, and how to close
them? As far as I can tell, I don't need them, but I've been unable to
find a combination of squid directives to make them
On Wed, Mar 26, 2003 at 02:15:28PM -0500, Kevin Cheek wrote:
I believe that UDP port is for receiving DNS responses.
Umm... No.
It's used for ICP, a protocol for intercommunication between squid
caches. For example, at my site we have two different caches. One is
basically transparent.
On Wed, Mar 26, 2003 at 03:18:36PM -0500, Noah L. Meyerhans wrote:
On Wed, Mar 26, 2003 at 02:15:28PM -0500, Kevin Cheek wrote:
I believe that UDP port is for receiving DNS responses.
It's used for ICP, a protocol for intercommunication between squid
caches. For example, at my site we have
Noah L. Meyerhans [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Wed, Mar 26, 2003 at 02:15:28PM -0500, Kevin Cheek wrote:
I believe that UDP port is for receiving DNS responses.
Umm... No.
It's used for ICP, a protocol for intercommunication between squid
caches. For example, at my site we have two
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Umm... No.
It's used for ICP, a protocol for intercommunication between squid
caches. For example, at my site we have two different caches. One is
basically transparent. The other provides anonymizing services. But,
through ICP, both caches can make use of each
Hi all,
On Tue, Mar 25, 2003 at 01:46:32PM -0600, Jones wrote:
One thing they forgot to mention was that they used Exchange for
email. That means instead of running exim, I will have to forward
SMTP POP traffic to their Exchange server. The Exchange server
will not be directly connected
hi,
I look at in the file /etc/passwd on my server today, and I saw the user
nobody has a shell !!. When I installed my debian (sarge, I know it's
bad, but it's just a server for me...) I put /bin/false. A few days ago,
while an upgrade, apt asked to me to upgrade that file to the new
On Wed, Mar 26, 2003 at 11:35:38AM +0100, Yoann wrote:
Hi,
I look at in the file /etc/passwd on my server today, and I saw the user
nobody has a shell !!. When I installed my debian (sarge, I know it's
bad, but it's just a server for me...) I put /bin/false. A few days ago,
while an
Does the user nobody has got a password in /etc/shadow ?
greets
Robbert
Citeren Yoann [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
hi,
I look at in the file /etc/passwd on my server today, and I saw the user
nobody has a shell !!. When I installed my debian (sarge, I know it's
bad, but it's just a server for
Hi,
I look at in the file /etc/passwd on my server today, and I saw the user
nobody has a shell !!. When I installed my debian (sarge, I know it's
bad, but it's just a server for me...) I put /bin/false. A few days ago,
while an upgrade, apt asked to me to upgrade that file to the new
version
I would like to bind squid to a specific interface.
I thought the easy way to do this would be with xinetd, but I get:
Mar 26 06:05:09 localhost squid: Cannot open HTTP Port
Mar 26 06:05:49 localhost last message repeated 10 times
When I try to use it. Normally this would mean there is a
Yoann [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
there is an * in /etc/shadow for nobody, but all services (ftp, web...)
are running with the uid nobody so if there is an attack on an unknow
bug (I keep up to date all services) on those services (buffer overflow
for example), It's will be unsercure.. .
It
On Wednesday 26 March 2003 15:16, Michael West wrote:
Hi there,
how about :
http_port xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx:8000
tcp_outgoing_address xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx
udp_outgoing_address xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx
in the squid config and run squid as daemon ?
Michi
I would like to bind squid to a specific interface.
I
On Wed, Mar 26, 2003 at 12:11:58PM +0100, Sven Hoexter wrote:
Well yes it could :) As long as the user has no valid password it's not very
usefull. Take a look into the /etc/shadow and in the second field you'll find
! or * indicating that this user has a invalid password. See man 5 shadow.
Dit e-mail adres bestaat niet
## Michael West ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
I would like to bind squid to a specific interface.
http_port hostname:port
http_port ip:port
http_port port
It's documented.
Regards,
cmt
--
Spare Space
Michael West wrote:
I would like to bind squid to a specific interface.
[...]
What am I doing wrong with xinetd? What other ways are there to make
squid bind to an interface?
IIRC there used to be an option tcp_incoming_adress in
/etc/squid.conf, but I think lately it was changed to be
* Michael West [EMAIL PROTECTED] [26-03-03 15:16]:
I would like to bind squid to a specific interface.
Look at /etc/squid.conf:
# NETWORK OPTIONS
# -
# TAG: http_port
# Usage: port
#
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi all,
I guess this question might be more suited on gnupg-users, but as I'm
not subscribed to that list, I hope you can forgive me for asking
here... It is a really short question...
Is there a way to remove revoked/expired and otherwise invalid
On Wed, Mar 26, 2003 at 10:50:48AM -0500, Noah L. Meyerhans wrote:
On Wed, Mar 26, 2003 at 12:11:58PM +0100, Sven Hoexter wrote:
Well yes it could :) As long as the user has no valid password it's not very
usefull. Take a look into the /etc/shadow and in the second field you'll
find
! or
does anyone know what squid's udp sockets are for, and how to close
them? As far as I can tell, I don't need them, but I've been unable to
find a combination of squid directives to make them all go away. The icp
port can be closed using icp_port 0, but the other one is dynamic and
isn't referred
I believe that UDP port is for receiving DNS responses.
-Kevin
Jason Lunz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
does anyone know what squid's udp sockets are for, and how to close
them? As far as I can tell, I don't need them, but I've been unable to
find a combination of squid directives to make them
On Wed, Mar 26, 2003 at 02:15:28PM -0500, Kevin Cheek wrote:
I believe that UDP port is for receiving DNS responses.
Umm... No.
It's used for ICP, a protocol for intercommunication between squid
caches. For example, at my site we have two different caches. One is
basically transparent.
On Wed, Mar 26, 2003 at 03:18:36PM -0500, Noah L. Meyerhans wrote:
On Wed, Mar 26, 2003 at 02:15:28PM -0500, Kevin Cheek wrote:
I believe that UDP port is for receiving DNS responses.
It's used for ICP, a protocol for intercommunication between squid
caches. For example, at my site we have
Noah L. Meyerhans [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Wed, Mar 26, 2003 at 02:15:28PM -0500, Kevin Cheek wrote:
I believe that UDP port is for receiving DNS responses.
Umm... No.
It's used for ICP, a protocol for intercommunication between squid
caches. For example, at my site we have two
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Umm... No.
It's used for ICP, a protocol for intercommunication between squid
caches. For example, at my site we have two different caches. One is
basically transparent. The other provides anonymizing services. But,
through ICP, both caches can make use of each
44 matches
Mail list logo
