On Sunday 25 May 2003 09:32 pm, Jeremy T. Bouse wrote:
Did you already check out documentation at the following URL?
http://www.freeswan.org/freeswan_trees/freeswan-1.99/doc/interop.html#micro
soft
I have a question that i have not been able to find a good conclusion for. Is
the
Hi folk,
On Apr 18 2003 4:18PM, at the bugtraq list Steve Grubb announced a bug
on Xinetd 2.3.10 and as a solution he advised to upgrade to the version
2.3.11. http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/319088
As the version in the stable woody is 2.3.4-1.2, I would like to know if
this package
On Wed, May 28, 2003 at 03:36:07AM -0500, Warren Turkal wrote:
I have a question that i have not been able to find a good conclusion for. Is
the Freeswan stuff compatible with the cisco vpn that require user/pass
logins?
It's definitely not compatible on its own. I asked Cisco support, and
On May 28, 12:05 (+0300), NANTENAINA TIANARIVO U. wrote:
As the version in the stable woody is 2.3.4-1.2, I would like to know if
this package is also vulnerable. If so is there any workaround about
this on the debian security team?
#190217
Versions in potato and woody are not
Hello to all
* I've got a problem with bind9
It is occasionaly sending it's queries using low numbered UDP port despite query-source
address * port 53; set in named.conf.
Most of the time it's using UDP port 53, as configured, but sometimes,
irrelatively of anything (as it
Jayson Vantuyl wrote:
This has been a hit on about seven different machines with vastly
different configurations (some missing everything but SSH) and all
firewalled down to the minimum.
I did not reread the whole thread, so sorry if I'm asking silly
questions, but perhaps it's not a security
Kondrashov Nickolay wrote:
Hello to all
* I've got a problem with bind9
It is occasionaly sending it's queries using low numbered UDP port
despite query-source address * port 53; set in named.conf.
Most of the time it's using UDP port 53, as configured, but
sometimes,
Hi,
I have a strange problem setting LVS (Linux Virtual Server) for a WEB
server. It works fine until browser tries to POST some information. Most
of times browser hangs for a while and exits after timeout, in logs I
can find error message about erroneus Content-length. As far as I
understand,
Jayson Vantuyl [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Thankfully, we don't have root passwords. In our space, we find root to
more of a concept than a user, so we disable the password and set up a
group that can su to root. That way we have a good handle on things.
Root never logs in, so we know
On Sun, May 25, 2003 at 02:32:56PM -0400, Noah Meyerhans wrote:
If you believe he'll be back, it might be worth it to set up a honeypot
and a box running tcpdump and capturing all the traffic to honeypot.
Set the honeypot up with the same services you run on your production
machines, and make
On Sun, May 25, 2003 at 02:35:32PM -0400, Ed McMan wrote:
Sunday, May 25, 2003, 2:04:30 PM, Jayson Vantuyl (Jayson) wrote:
Jayson We've had a number of hacked boxen recently. It appears a certain
Jayson person (Romanian we think) is specifically targeting us and our
Jayson customers (looks
On Sun, May 25, 2003 at 08:44:29PM +0100, David Ramsden wrote:
I've found that when running a system were the users can put up their
web pages.. most insecure.
It's virtually impossible to know what each user is running under their
web space.. An exploitable version of PHPNuke for example,
On Tue, May 27, 2003 at 06:23:10PM -0500, Andr?s Rold?n wrote:
Hi.
I was reading about certain kind of attacks about TCP sequence and I was
wondering whether iptables is vulnerable to theses attacks. Especifically,
whether iptables is capable to know if a RELATED or ESTABLISHED package is
On Sunday 25 May 2003 09:32 pm, Jeremy T. Bouse wrote:
Did you already check out documentation at the following URL?
http://www.freeswan.org/freeswan_trees/freeswan-1.99/doc/interop.html#micro
soft
I have a question that i have not been able to find a good conclusion for. Is
the
Hi folk,
On Apr 18 2003 4:18PM, at the bugtraq list Steve Grubb announced a bug
on Xinetd 2.3.10 and as a solution he advised to upgrade to the version
2.3.11. http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/319088
As the version in the stable woody is 2.3.4-1.2, I would like to know if
this package
On Wed, May 28, 2003 at 03:36:07AM -0500, Warren Turkal wrote:
I have a question that i have not been able to find a good conclusion for. Is
the Freeswan stuff compatible with the cisco vpn that require user/pass
logins?
It's definitely not compatible on its own. I asked Cisco support, and
On May 28, 12:05 (+0300), NANTENAINA TIANARIVO U. wrote:
As the version in the stable woody is 2.3.4-1.2, I would like to know if
this package is also vulnerable. If so is there any workaround about
this on the debian security team?
#190217
Versions in potato and woody are not
Hello to all
* I've got a problem with bind9
It is occasionaly sending it's queries using low numbered UDP port despite
query-source address * port 53; set in named.conf.
Most of the time it's using UDP port 53, as configured, but sometimes,
irrelatively of
Jayson Vantuyl wrote:
This has been a hit on about seven different machines with vastly
different configurations (some missing everything but SSH) and all
firewalled down to the minimum.
I did not reread the whole thread, so sorry if I'm asking silly
questions, but perhaps it's not a
Kondrashov Nickolay wrote:
Hello to all
* I've got a problem with bind9
It is occasionaly sending it's queries using low numbered UDP port
despite query-source address * port 53; set in named.conf.
Most of the time it's using UDP port 53, as configured, but
sometimes,
Hi,
I have a strange problem setting LVS (Linux Virtual Server) for a WEB
server. It works fine until browser tries to POST some information. Most
of times browser hangs for a while and exits after timeout, in logs I
can find error message about erroneus Content-length. As far as I
understand,
Jayson Vantuyl [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Thankfully, we don't have root passwords. In our space, we find root to
more of a concept than a user, so we disable the password and set up a
group that can su to root. That way we have a good handle on things.
Root never logs in, so we know
Daniel Kobras sent the following message Today:
DK It's definitely not compatible on its own. I asked Cisco support, and
DK they told me that it _might_ work when running freeswan on top of l2tp.
DK Didn't get me much further, though. If someone else manages to figure it
DK out, please let
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
of them. It's not a password problem either. He seems to have hacked
multiple of them within an hour of each other (his rootkit files
aren't very clever about covering up mtime). I just can't tell how he
got in.
Maybe he didn't use the same method for all of them.
Sehr geehrte Damen und Herren,
klein, quadratisch, praktisch und hoffentlich gut, präsentiert sich jetzt unser
Marktplatz für das Bayerische Oberland.
Unter http://www.sylvenstein.com
finden Sie unsere neu überholte regionale Suchmaschine, das
Oberland-Branchenbuch und natürlich unseren
===
Sollten Sie keine Informationen mehr von
uns wünchen, können Sie Ihre Email-Adresse
über folgende URL sofort aus dem System entfernen:
http://www.sylvenstein.com/mailer/mailnews.html
===
On Wed, May 28, 2003 at 02:06:21PM +0200, Olaf Dietsche wrote:
Just curious, how do you su to root, if root's password is disabled?
Do you have a modified su replacement?
su uses PAM. So it doesn't need to use root entry in /etc/passwd. It
could do something insane like consult a RADIUS
Taken from news://blueyonder.comp.linux -
A friend of mine has his Debian box r00ted. It only seems to have been
brought to his attention after seeing a file being wgetted and
compiled
within his Apache error log.
He brought it to my attention as he originally suspected that there
may be
29 matches
Mail list logo
