Not sure if I got the right address or not, but check this out.
http://www.downloadhangout.com/ref44.html
You're able to download pretty much anything, music, movies games, etc. I managed to
download 8 CD's so far.
You're going to pass out when you see how many movies and games and music CD's
I've been giving APT 0.6 a lot of thought lately and have come to
the conclusion that it is a whole lot of snake oil in the context of
the Debian project as we have it. Bear with me for a second... I am
not about to take the piss out of the APT 0.6 people, who have done
an outstanding job. The
martin f krafft [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
So I guess this email isn't about APT 0.6, which does what it should
and does so well. It's more about the dangers of having 1000 keys
allowing write access to the archive, and noone capable of
playing sheriff with the size of the project anymore.
I
martin f krafft wrote:
Debian did not have package signatures for years, and it's been
rarely a problem. Now we are going to add them, but the sole effect
is that of a false security feeling. To me, APT 0.6 is snake oil,
which is *not* an offence to the guys behind apt-secure. It's
a criticism
On Mon, 23 Aug 2004 09:34, Geoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There is an elaborate system to maintain quality in new Debian
developers (which seems like a good idea to me). Why not have some sort
of system for ensuring the quality in continuing DD?
If a DD didn't meet the criteria they would go
Russell Coker [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Removing developers who don't meet certain criteria (EG no package
uploads for 6 months) from active status makes a lot of sense.
Anyone care to propose a GR?
Careful about terminology here. I wouldn't say remove, just we drop
them from the list of
On Mon, 23 Aug 2004 13:07, Thomas Bushnell BSG [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Russell Coker [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Removing developers who don't meet certain criteria (EG no package
uploads for 6 months) from active status makes a lot of sense.
Anyone care to propose a GR?
Careful about
Russell Coker [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Removing from active status seems appropriate to me.
But that's a totally different subject. If you want to remove Debian
developers from the list of developers, because they haven't uploaded
in six months (what about packages that don't have bugs?!)
On Mon, Aug 23, 2004 at 12:59:59PM +1000, Russell Coker wrote:
On Mon, 23 Aug 2004 09:34, Geoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There is an elaborate system to maintain quality in new Debian
developers (which seems like a good idea to me). Why not have some sort
of system for ensuring the quality
On Mon, 23 Aug 2004 14:46, Bron Gondwana [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Removing developers who don't meet certain criteria (EG no package
uploads for 6 months) from active status makes a lot of sense. Anyone
care to propose a GR?
This doesn't work. The problem is basically:
a) what about a
10 matches
Mail list logo
