also sprach Michal Sabala [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006.02.20.2328 +0100]:
host -t a security.debian.org
security.debian.org has address 82.94.249.158 - slow
Please see
http://lists.debian.org/debian-security/2006/02/msg00041.html
Editing /etc/hosts to contain:
128.101.80.133
82.94.249.158
5 hops, avg 5ms
I'm in Belgium and their server is in Netherland.
The debian security is too small to know if the file transfert is
slow or not.
128.101.80.133
13hops, avg 109ms
194.109.137.218
7hops, avg 5ms
regards,
Francois
On 21 Feb 2006, at 03:25,
On Tue, Feb 21, 2006 at 09:18:16AM +0100, martin f krafft wrote:
also sprach Michal Sabala [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006.02.20.2328 +0100]:
host -t a security.debian.org
security.debian.org has address 82.94.249.158 - slow
Please see
also sprach Brett Parker [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006.02.21.1023 +0100]:
*blink* - erm, just out of interest, how does this help? This is just
going to stop packets from going to that IP, it's not going to stop
things resolving to that IP, so instead of getting a slow connection
you're just going
On Tue, Feb 21, 2006 at 09:23:07AM +, Brett Parker wrote:
*blink* - erm, just out of interest, how does this help? This is just
going to stop packets from going to that IP, it's not going to stop
things resolving to that IP, so instead of getting a slow connection
you're just going to get
On Mon, Feb 20, 2006 at 06:25:47PM -0800, Michael Sabala wrote:
host -t a security.debian.org
security.debian.org has address 82.94.249.158 - slow
I checked traceroute to 82.94.249.158 from two different ISPs.
When the route goes through:
ameritech-sbcglobal-he.net-xs4all.net
On Fri, 17 Feb 2006 17:40:29 +, Brian Brazil wrote:
This won't upgrade automatically as the version in Sarge/AMD64 is
higher, specifically 1.4.1-1.0.1. According to pdo.d.n, all other
archs have 1.4.1-1.
By my reading of Debian Policy[1], the comparison of 1.0.1 and
1sarge1 compares
7 matches
Mail list logo
