-source-2.4.20.
[1] = deb http://legolas.alternex.com.br/~stratus/debian/ ./
Cheers,
--
Gustavo Franco [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-source-2.4.20.
[1] = deb http://legolas.alternex.com.br/~stratus/debian/ ./
Cheers,
--
Gustavo Franco [EMAIL PROTECTED]
://www.nessus.org/nessus_2_0.html
Hi jfs,
What's the relationship between these nessus 2.0 packages and the nessus
2.0.1 packages[1] of Josip Rodin at the experimental release?
[1] = http://packages.debian.org/experimental/admin/nessusd.html
Thanks in advance,
--
Gustavo Franco [EMAIL PROTECTED
://www.nessus.org/nessus_2_0.html
Hi jfs,
What's the relationship between these nessus 2.0 packages and the nessus
2.0.1 packages[1] of Josip Rodin at the experimental release?
[1] = http://packages.debian.org/experimental/admin/nessusd.html
Thanks in advance,
--
Gustavo Franco [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, 2002-12-10 at 16:52, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
On Tue, Dec 10, 2002 at 04:36:08PM -0200, Gustavo Franco wrote:
No, you can't rebuild snort version from unstable.
Who can't? You can't? I just did, and it was not only possible, but easy.
Nick Boyce!
apt-get build-dep snort apt-get
On Tue, 2002-12-10 at 16:52, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
On Tue, Dec 10, 2002 at 04:36:08PM -0200, Gustavo Franco wrote:
No, you can't rebuild snort version from unstable.
Who can't? You can't? I just did, and it was not only possible, but easy.
Nick Boyce!
apt-get build-dep snort apt-get
system plus snort from unstable
system and obviously the depends.More easy to keep updated.
[1] =
http://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/apt-howto/ch-apt-get.en.html#s-default-version
This is the section 3.8, check the 3.9 below too.
cya,
Gustavo Franco -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE
that Debian can support one more kernel flavor, it's so easy.You
can see the previous commented patch called grsecurity, it has PaX and
more interesting features to enhance security without rebuild the entire
system.Comments here?
cya,
Gustavo Franco -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE
pseudo-commercial source.
A online database with md5sums of systems:
http://www.knowngoods.org/index.php
The bad thing that they still have only Debian 2.2r5 md5sums.
You can try the file integrity checker of them at:
http://osiris.shmoo.com/
cya,
Gustavo Franco -- [EMAIL PROTECTED
system plus snort from unstable
system and obviously the depends.More easy to keep updated.
[1] =
http://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/apt-howto/ch-apt-get.en.html#s-default-version
This is the section 3.8, check the 3.9 below too.
cya,
Gustavo Franco -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
that Debian can support one more kernel flavor, it's so easy.You
can see the previous commented patch called grsecurity, it has PaX and
more interesting features to enhance security without rebuild the entire
system.Comments here?
cya,
Gustavo Franco -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
pseudo-commercial source.
A online database with md5sums of systems:
http://www.knowngoods.org/index.php
The bad thing that they still have only Debian 2.2r5 md5sums.
You can try the file integrity checker of them at:
http://osiris.shmoo.com/
cya,
Gustavo Franco -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-apt).
[1] = http://packages.debian.org/cron-apt/
[2] = http://people.debian.org/~ajt/
[3] = http://apt-proxy.sourceforge.net/
Talking about secpack, is it non-free? I can't see in your mail(Clemens)
the url or apt-line to get the source package.
Thanks,
--
Gustavo Franco -- [EMAIL PROTECTED
by default.One harden flavor to sarge
with grsecurity patch can be good.Any feedback of d-boot guys?
Thanks,
--
Gustavo Franco -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
GNUpg id: 0x37155778 (try: wwwkeys.eu.pgp.net)
I prefer encrypted and signed e-mail.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject
-apt).
[1] = http://packages.debian.org/cron-apt/
[2] = http://people.debian.org/~ajt/
[3] = http://apt-proxy.sourceforge.net/
Talking about secpack, is it non-free? I can't see in your mail(Clemens)
the url or apt-line to get the source package.
Thanks,
--
Gustavo Franco -- [EMAIL PROTECTED
by default.One harden flavor to sarge
with grsecurity patch can be good.Any feedback of d-boot guys?
Thanks,
--
Gustavo Franco -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
GNUpg id: 0x37155778 (try: wwwkeys.eu.pgp.net)
I prefer encrypted and signed e-mail.
on
Makefile: -grsec-1.9.4.For
more information check: bugs.debian.org/143198.
bye,
- --
Gustavo Franco - a.k.a stratus [EMAIL PROTECTED]
GNUpg id: 0x3715578
Alternex S/A - RJ/Brasil - http://www.alternex.com.br
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Key fingerprint
On Thu, 28 Mar 2002 18:29:22 JST
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (NOKUBI Takatsugu) wrote:
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I could made potato package easily from sid's source. It requires
build-essential and debhelper to do it.
Ok guy, but apt pin is so easy =)
On Thu, 28 Mar 2002 18:29:22 JST
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (NOKUBI Takatsugu) wrote:
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I could made potato package easily from sid's source. It requires
build-essential and debhelper to do it.
Ok guy, but apt pin is so easy =)
However
On Wed, 27 Mar 2002 09:11:58 JST
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (NOKUBI Takatsugu) wrote:
[...]
I could made potato package easily from sid's source. It requires
build-essential and debhelper to do it.
Ok guy, but apt pin is so easy =)
See:
- Add in your sources.list something like:
deb
On Wed, 27 Mar 2002 00:37:59 +0100
martin f krafft [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]
(please fix your line wraps!)
security.debian.org has proftpd_1.2.0pre10-2.0potato1 which does not
contain this bug, at least not on i386 systems:
fishbowl:~ ncftp lapse.home.madduck.net
NcFTP 3.1.2
On Wed, 27 Mar 2002 09:11:58 JST
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (NOKUBI Takatsugu) wrote:
[...]
I could made potato package easily from sid's source. It requires
build-essential and debhelper to do it.
Ok guy, but apt pin is so easy =)
See:
- Add in your sources.list something like:
deb
On Wed, 27 Mar 2002 00:37:59 +0100
martin f krafft [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]
(please fix your line wraps!)
security.debian.org has proftpd_1.2.0pre10-2.0potato1 which does not
contain this bug, at least not on i386 systems:
fishbowl:~ ncftp lapse.home.madduck.net
NcFTP 3.1.2 (Jan
On Tue, 26 Mar 2002 16:15:05 +
Simon Young [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
[...]
Is there any way of detecting rootkits on potato?
See: http://packages.debian.org/chkrootkit
Try apt pin and get chkrootkit from sid.
bye,
--
_
On Tue, 26 Mar 2002 16:15:05 +
Simon Young [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
[...]
Is there any way of detecting rootkits on potato?
See: http://packages.debian.org/chkrootkit
Try apt pin and get chkrootkit from sid.
bye,
--
_
On Fri, 23 Mar 2001 13:50:54 +0100
Philippe Seidel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
As you are the only security-related list I'm subscribed to and
cryptography has something to do with security, I'm directing this
question to this list.
[...]
Hi Philippe,
I'm reading 'Cryptography
On Fri, 23 Mar 2001 13:50:54 +0100
Philippe Seidel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
As you are the only security-related list I'm subscribed to and
cryptography has something to do with security, I'm directing this
question to this list.
[...]
Hi Philippe,
I'm reading 'Cryptography
On Thu, 28 Feb 2002 15:55:13 +0100
Johan Jacobsson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi!
Try stunnel (p.d.o/stunnel) for ssl encryption.
Hello!
I am using netsaint_statd on a debian machine and I would like to know
what I am doing, eg what security holes may this create?
As I understand it, the
On Thu, 28 Feb 2002 15:55:13 +0100
Johan Jacobsson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi!
Try stunnel (p.d.o/stunnel) for ssl encryption.
Hello!
I am using netsaint_statd on a debian machine and I would like to know
what I am doing, eg what security holes may this create?
As I understand it, the
29 matches
Mail list logo
