Sorry for the top post.
Can beat Oskar Andreasson's IPTables Tutorial
http://iptables-tutorial.frozentux.net/
Jim
Pierre Chifflier wrote:
On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 12:20:27PM +0100, cyril franke wrote:
Hello list,
I just started learning firewall setup with iptables
and found the
Hi everyone,
If I am sending this to the wrong list please let me know!
I have a server, details below, that I've updated to address the ssl
random number generator issue but after generating the new ssh_host rsa
and ssh_host_dsa keys, ssh still complains they're still vulnerable. I
would
A n d i k a Triwidada wrote:
On Thu, Jun 5, 2008 at 1:29 AM, James Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
libssl0.9.8:
Installed: 0.9.8e-4
Candidate: 0.9.8e-4
Version table:
*** 0.9.8e-4 0
100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
0.9.8c-4etch3 0
500 http://security.debian.org etch/updates/main
Alex Samad wrote:
On Thu, May 15, 2008 at 07:43:13PM -0400, Chris Adams wrote:
On May 15, 2008, at 6:25 PM, Alex Samad wrote:
is there away to check x509 certs with these tools ?
Yes - the wiki has one (http://wiki.debian.org/SSLkeys) but you might
prefer the
Hello everyone,
I hope I'm not doing something 'dumb' on my account here but I get the
following error when I run 'apt-get update'.
W: GPG error: http://mirrors.kernel.org testing Release: The following
signatures couldn't be verified because the public key is not available:
NO_PUBKEY
Positive press for Debian's security team.
Using numbers from a pair of metrics, Forrester Research's
recommendation was businesses that value quick patches look to
Microsoft and Debian.
Full article at
http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=storycid=1738e=2u=/zd/200
40330/tc_zd/123143
Positive press for Debian's security team.
Using numbers from a pair of metrics, Forrester Research's
recommendation was businesses that value quick patches look to
Microsoft and Debian.
Full article at
http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=storycid=1738e=2u=/zd/200
40330/tc_zd/123143
I'm on the Debian security list to get Debian related security notifications
and info. Could you please take this discussion elsewhere?!
-Original Message-
From: Jonathan Walther [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, February 25, 2004 9:56 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:
I'm on the Debian security list to get Debian related security notifications
and info. Could you please take this discussion elsewhere?!
-Original Message-
From: Jonathan Walther [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, February 25, 2004 9:56 AM
To:
If memory serves.. AXFR is a zone transfer... So, at your firewall, would
want to only allowing TCP queries from your backup (secondary,
trinary..etc.) dns servers (on the outside of your firewall) and limit
everyone else to UDP queries. And for your bind9 config something like
this:
Will the package maintainers of BIND be integrating the patches from
ISC-BIND to negate Verisign's recent shenanigans?
--from ISC's web site --
In response to high demand from our users, ISC is releasing a patch for BIND
to support the declaration of delegation-only zones in caching/recursive
Will the package maintainers of BIND be integrating the patches from
ISC-BIND to negate Verisign's recent shenanigans?
--from ISC's web site --
In response to high demand from our users, ISC is releasing a patch for BIND
to support the declaration of delegation-only zones in caching/recursive
12 matches
Mail list logo
