Title: RE: IPSec VPN
> > - If so which is compatible? Is FreeSWan compatible?
>
> FreeSWan is compatible, but only as a "Branch Office" tunnel, not as a
> dynamic Client tunnel. Check with the administrator of the Contivity
> VPN Switch on whether he/she is willing to set it up.
I didn't r
Title: RE: CGI Buffer Overflow?
It's a worm called Code Red, spreading thru IIS-servers. Nothing
you have to worry about if you're only running Apache.
We dont, so we should have worried yesterday. =)
There are info on cert.org, eeya.com and probably /. and
so on..
I've seen 100 of this on
Title: RE: CGI Buffer Overflow?
It's a worm called Code Red, spreading thru IIS-servers. Nothing
you have to worry about if you're only running Apache.
We dont, so we should have worried yesterday. =)
There are info on cert.org, eeya.com and probably /. and
so on..
I've seen 100 of this on
Title: RE: Realserver 8 & Webinator on Debian
> 1. Will they install or are they not compatible. For example, while
> Webinator would work with Redhat 7, Realserver 8 would not. (But Real
> Server 7 did install on Redhat 6)
I've been running Realserver 6 and 7 on RedHat and Debian, and no
Title: RE: Debian or Linux 7???
> Just how much more secure is Debian than redhat?
No dist is more secure than the adminstrator of the box.
A good configured RedHat is also secure, even though Debian might be
more secure 'out of the box'.
And I dont think your security-problem is in the
Title: RE: Realserver 8 & Webinator on Debian
> 1. Will they install or are they not compatible. For example, while
> Webinator would work with Redhat 7, Realserver 8 would not. (But Real
> Server 7 did install on Redhat 6)
I've been running Realserver 6 and 7 on RedHat and Debian, and no
Title: RE: Debian or Linux 7???
> Just how much more secure is Debian than redhat?
No dist is more secure than the adminstrator of the box.
A good configured RedHat is also secure, even though Debian might be
more secure 'out of the box'.
And I dont think your security-problem is in the
Title: RE: port-scanning. advise?
I'm very sorry about the html-mail I just sent, i'll never happen again.
I think i hate this place, running outlook and other crap. =)
Here's the mail again so everyone can read it. =)
Jeje, whatever.
-Original Message-----
From:
Title: RE: port-scanning. advise?
> > What makes me curious is the fact that no ip came from the same
> > geographical area. Literraly the ips resolved to machines
> from all the
> > continents of the world! As if I was under global attack! :-)
> > Of course these could be spoofed, but sure
Title: RE: port-scanning. advise?
I'm very sorry about the html-mail I just sent, i'll never happen again.
I think i hate this place, running outlook and other crap. =)
Here's the mail again so everyone can read it. =)
Jeje, whatever.
-Original Message-----
From:
Title: RE: port-scanning. advise?
> > What makes me curious is the fact that no ip came from the same
> > geographical area. Literraly the ips resolved to machines
> from all the
> > continents of the world! As if I was under global attack! :-)
> > Of course these could be spoofed, but sure
11 matches
Mail list logo
