On Sat, Apr 06, 2002 at 08:48:59AM +, Martin WHEELER wrote:
On Fri, 5 Apr 2002, Petro wrote:
You *like* upgrading 100 servers every few days?
You'll have to ask the scripts that do that stuff for me :)
So you don't mind verifying ever couple days that none of your
On Sat, Apr 06, 2002 at 08:48:59AM +, Martin WHEELER wrote:
On Fri, 5 Apr 2002, Petro wrote:
You *like* upgrading 100 servers every few days?
You'll have to ask the scripts that do that stuff for me :)
So you don't mind verifying ever couple days that none of your
On Thu, Apr 04, 2002 at 06:24:18PM +, Martin WHEELER wrote:
On Wed, Apr 03, 2002 at 09:22:34AM +, Martin WHEELER wrote:
Release early; release often.
On Wed, 3 Apr 2002, Petro wrote:
bemfont size=7blinkNO/font/em/b
Measure twice, cut once.
Fine. You wear the same
On Wed, Apr 03, 2002 at 10:56:32AM +0900, Howland, Curtis wrote:
I would bet that the vast majority of flame wars begin because someone mistakes
terse or concise for hostility.
The reverse, being the endless spewing of meaningless words, all the while saying
nothing at all or even the
On Wed, Apr 03, 2002 at 09:22:34AM +, Martin WHEELER wrote:
Release early; release often.
bemfont size=7blinkNO/font/em/b
Measure twice, cut once.
--
Share and Enjoy.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL
On Wed, Apr 03, 2002 at 10:56:32AM +0900, Howland, Curtis wrote:
I would bet that the vast majority of flame wars begin because someone
mistakes terse or concise for hostility.
The reverse, being the endless spewing of meaningless words, all the while
saying nothing at all or even the
On Mon, Mar 25, 2002 at 06:01:45AM -0300, Luiz Carlos Santos de Alencar wrote:
Andrew Tait wrote:
I've checked up one of that IPs; it's being used right now by a web
server pretty much infected with I-Worm.Nimda.A! AVG identification.
The standard page delivers a readme.eml file in a pop-up
On Mon, Mar 25, 2002 at 06:01:45AM -0300, Luiz Carlos Santos de Alencar wrote:
Andrew Tait wrote:
I've checked up one of that IPs; it's being used right now by a web
server pretty much infected with I-Worm.Nimda.A! AVG identification.
The standard page delivers a readme.eml file in a pop-up
On Mon, Mar 25, 2002 at 04:50:17PM -0500, Gary MacDougall wrote:
Agreed.
I'll never understand why people will let crackers reap havoc
on a network without issue, but if someone comes up and tries
to break into my house, the police will be there in 2 seconds.
Hate to break it to you, but
On Mon, Mar 25, 2002 at 04:50:17PM -0500, Gary MacDougall wrote:
Agreed.
I'll never understand why people will let crackers reap havoc
on a network without issue, but if someone comes up and tries
to break into my house, the police will be there in 2 seconds.
Hate to break it to you, but
On Sun, Mar 24, 2002 at 12:28:17PM -0500, timothy bauscher wrote:
We seriouslly need a US branch of the law-enforcement to deal
with this sort of stuff.
I respect your opinion, but i would hate to
have a new branch of government wasting my
tax dollars. If these types of attacks can
be
On Sun, Mar 24, 2002 at 07:24:18PM +0100, andreas mayer wrote:
We seriouslly need a US branch of the law-enforcement to deal
with this sort of stuff. ?I think if more people got prosecuted for
trying to crack into a site, the level of BS would drop to zero.
Yeah! And what if the attacker
On Sun, Mar 24, 2002 at 12:28:17PM -0500, timothy bauscher wrote:
We seriouslly need a US branch of the law-enforcement to deal
with this sort of stuff.
I respect your opinion, but i would hate to
have a new branch of government wasting my
tax dollars. If these types of attacks can
be
On Sun, Mar 24, 2002 at 07:24:18PM +0100, andreas mayer wrote:
We seriouslly need a US branch of the law-enforcement to deal
with this sort of stuff. ?I think if more people got prosecuted for
trying to crack into a site, the level of BS would drop to zero.
Yeah! And what if the attacker
On Wed, Mar 13, 2002 at 10:36:15AM +, David Hart wrote:
On Wed, Mar 13, 2002 at 01:47:57AM +, David Hart wrote:
Duh, sorry. As someone else has kindly pointed out,
'potato/woody'/'stable/testing' should be transposed :) (I really
shouldn't post at 1:45 in the morning)
Why?
On Wed, Mar 13, 2002 at 04:31:01PM +0100, Michel Verdier wrote:
Petro [EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit :
| The last match is used, try to switch these ones
|
| I did, that is the second. I'll try it again.
In fact you have 3 /var statements, the order should refine matching like
On Wed, Mar 13, 2002 at 10:36:15AM +, David Hart wrote:
On Wed, Mar 13, 2002 at 01:47:57AM +, David Hart wrote:
Duh, sorry. As someone else has kindly pointed out,
'potato/woody'/'stable/testing' should be transposed :) (I really
shouldn't post at 1:45 in the morning)
Why?
On Wed, Mar 13, 2002 at 04:31:01PM +0100, Michel Verdier wrote:
Petro [EMAIL PROTECTED] a ?crit :
| The last match is used, try to switch these ones
|
| I did, that is the second. I'll try it again.
In fact you have 3 /var statements, the order should refine matching like
On Tue, Mar 12, 2002 at 08:59:08AM +0100, Martin Peikert wrote:
Petro wrote:
Is there a file-security scanner like tripwire (or like AIDE) that
works across a network? I'm envisioning something that does local
file scanning, then transmits the resulting table to a remote (more
On Tue, Mar 12, 2002 at 08:57:40PM +0100, Michel Verdier wrote:
Petro [EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit :
| !/var/log/ksymoops/
| /var/log@@LOGSEARCH
|
| Now, according to my understanding, the ! in front of /var/log/ksymoops/
| should be telling tripwire to ignore things under
On Tue, Mar 12, 2002 at 08:59:08AM +0100, Martin Peikert wrote:
Petro wrote:
Is there a file-security scanner like tripwire (or like AIDE) that
works across a network? I'm envisioning something that does local
file scanning, then transmits the resulting table to a remote (more
On Tue, Mar 12, 2002 at 08:57:40PM +0100, Michel Verdier wrote:
Petro [EMAIL PROTECTED] a ?crit :
| !/var/log/ksymoops/
| /var/log@@LOGSEARCH
|
| Now, according to my understanding, the ! in front of /var/log/ksymoops/
| should be telling tripwire to ignore things under
I have tripwire installed on one of my servers (Debian Stable), and I've
managed to get the configuration pretty quiet, but I'm having a little
problem with one or two of them.
The particular section of tw.config looks like:
/var@@AW
!/var/log/ksymoops/
/var/log@@LOGSEARCH
I have tripwire installed on one of my servers (Debian Stable), and I've
managed to get the configuration pretty quiet, but I'm having a little
problem with one or two of them.
The particular section of tw.config looks like:
/var@@AW
!/var/log/ksymoops/
/var/log@@LOGSEARCH
On Thu, Feb 28, 2002 at 08:37:45AM -, Jeff wrote:
I received this CERT Advisory about 6 hours ago, regarding PHP.
The php website confirms the details: www.php.net
I think this is going to be a problem for us, due to the way
the Debian packaging works -
I guess that the immediate
For some very good reasons I had to do a mass change of passwords
on one of our exposed login machines (no breach/hack, different
reason).
There is a utility included in Debian Stable (and the others) to do
this called chpasswd.
I believe there may be some security
On Thu, Feb 28, 2002 at 08:37:45AM -, Jeff wrote:
I received this CERT Advisory about 6 hours ago, regarding PHP.
The php website confirms the details: www.php.net
I think this is going to be a problem for us, due to the way
the Debian packaging works -
I guess that the immediate
For some very good reasons I had to do a mass change of passwords
on one of our exposed login machines (no breach/hack, different
reason).
There is a utility included in Debian Stable (and the others) to do
this called chpasswd.
I believe there may be some security
On Mon, Feb 25, 2002 at 02:18:29PM -0700, Jerry Lynde wrote:
True, true...
But Michael was asking for secure, not non-anal licensing... I don't expect
he was gonna
try and hack BIND or djbdns or anything else... shrug
I just wouldn't suggest anyone use BIND is the same sense that I wouldn't
On Mon, Feb 25, 2002 at 02:18:29PM -0700, Jerry Lynde wrote:
True, true...
But Michael was asking for secure, not non-anal licensing... I don't expect
he was gonna
try and hack BIND or djbdns or anything else... shrug
I just wouldn't suggest anyone use BIND is the same sense that I wouldn't
On Wed, Feb 13, 2002 at 09:39:02PM -0800, Ted Cabeen wrote:
You shouldn't use the update-rc.d script to remove init.d scripts. If you
do, when you upgrade the package, all of the scripts should be reinstalled.
Read the man page for update-rc.d for info on how to turn off a service and
ensure
On Mon, Jan 21, 2002 at 06:16:34AM -0800, martin f krafft wrote:
assuming i have SecurID tokens with licenses, can i make linux
authenticate based on these *without* the use of external or commercial
software (like ACE/Server)? any experience anyone?
I don't think so.
But I'd be
On Mon, Jan 21, 2002 at 06:16:34AM -0800, martin f krafft wrote:
assuming i have SecurID tokens with licenses, can i make linux
authenticate based on these *without* the use of external or commercial
software (like ACE/Server)? any experience anyone?
I don't think so.
But I'd be
On Fri, Dec 28, 2001 at 11:18:35AM +0300, Nyarlathotep wrote:
On Fri, 2001-12-28 at 03:22, Howland, Curtis wrote:
Naa, it's simian posturing. It happens with humans everywhere. I
enjoyed watching it in Good Will Hunting, and two days ago rented
Finding Forrester (same movie, different
Is this host offline for good?
Shouldn't there be an obvious mirror of this somewhere?
--
Share and Enjoy.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, Dec 20, 2001 at 04:54:01PM -0800, Brian Bilbrey wrote:
On Thu, Dec 20, 2001 at 12:42:17PM -0800, Petro wrote:
Is this host offline for good?
h. Try cdimage.debian.org (there's no 's' in the url as you put it
in the subject: line). However, right now, I'm timing out
Is this host offline for good?
Shouldn't there be an obvious mirror of this somewhere?
--
Share and Enjoy.
On Thu, Dec 20, 2001 at 04:54:01PM -0800, Brian Bilbrey wrote:
On Thu, Dec 20, 2001 at 12:42:17PM -0800, Petro wrote:
Is this host offline for good?
h. Try cdimage.debian.org (there's no 's' in the url as you put it
in the subject: line). However, right now, I'm timing out
On Thu, Dec 20, 2001 at 12:42:17PM -0800, Petro wrote:
Is this host offline for good?
Shouldn't there be an obvious mirror of this somewhere?
I got my answer to the obvious mirror part, and found the
information (if not the file) that I was looking for.
thanks for all
On Mon, Dec 17, 2001 at 11:48:13PM +0900, Yooseong Yang wrote:
can you speak korean? if so give them a call or a nasty email for us.
I am be shameful of this kinda spam stuffs as a korean.
I send an email to hanmail mail administrator about this kinda
problem. If I got some mails from whom
On Mon, Dec 17, 2001 at 11:48:13PM +0900, Yooseong Yang wrote:
can you speak korean? if so give them a call or a nasty email for us.
I am be shameful of this kinda spam stuffs as a korean.
I send an email to hanmail mail administrator about this kinda
problem. If I got some mails from whom is
On Fri, Dec 14, 2001 at 06:22:03PM -0600, Daniel Rychlik wrote:
How do I stop this from happening. Apparently my bud telented to port 25
and somehow sent mail from my root account. Any suggestions, white papers
or links? Id would like to block the telnet application all together, but I
On Fri, Dec 14, 2001 at 06:22:03PM -0600, Daniel Rychlik wrote:
How do I stop this from happening. Apparently my bud telented to port 25
and somehow sent mail from my root account. Any suggestions, white papers
or links? Id would like to block the telnet application all together, but I
dont
On Tue, Dec 11, 2001 at 01:33:41AM +, Andrew Bolt wrote:
...unless you are from Hollywood - in which case a good encryption
scheme is one that can be cracked by having lots of digits flash
up on the screen, and gradually have individual digits lock into
the correct key.
Some wierd
On Tue, Dec 11, 2001 at 01:33:41AM +, Andrew Bolt wrote:
...unless you are from Hollywood - in which case a good encryption
scheme is one that can be cracked by having lots of digits flash
up on the screen, and gradually have individual digits lock into
the correct key.
Some wierd
On Sat, Dec 08, 2001 at 01:40:06AM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
After reading a previous thread about stopping services from listening
on certains ports, I decided to investigate things a little further for
my system.
So, what I can figure out is that it seems that I have only the
On Sat, Dec 08, 2001 at 01:40:06AM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
After reading a previous thread about stopping services from listening
on certains ports, I decided to investigate things a little further for
my system.
So, what I can figure out is that it seems that I have only the
On Thu, Nov 29, 2001 at 05:59:40PM +, Niall Walsh wrote:
Carel Fellinger wrote:
On Thu, Nov 29, 2001 at 10:37:24AM +, Niall Walsh wrote:
I can't resist it!
me too:)
Add a usb digital camera to the box and only allow people who are not
I've thought of this too, but rejected it
On Thu, Nov 29, 2001 at 05:59:40PM +, Niall Walsh wrote:
Carel Fellinger wrote:
On Thu, Nov 29, 2001 at 10:37:24AM +, Niall Walsh wrote:
I can't resist it!
me too:)
Add a usb digital camera to the box and only allow people who are not
I've thought of this too, but rejected it
On Wed, Nov 28, 2001 at 10:58:47AM +0900, Olaf Meeuwissen wrote:
Blake Barnett [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Can't you give a group sudo access? If so, just add everyone to a group
and give that group sudo /sbin/halt or sudo /sbin/shutdown or both.
That's exactly what my sudo setup does
On Wed, Nov 28, 2001 at 10:58:47AM +0900, Olaf Meeuwissen wrote:
Blake Barnett [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Can't you give a group sudo access? If so, just add everyone to a group
and give that group sudo /sbin/halt or sudo /sbin/shutdown or both.
That's exactly what my sudo setup does
On Tue, Nov 27, 2001 at 12:44:23PM +0100, Janusz A. Urbanowicz wrote:
Petro wrote/napisa?[a]/schrieb:
On Mon, Nov 26, 2001 at 12:17:32PM +1100, Steve Smith wrote:
3DES is generally considered strong enough. However, it is slow, and
can effect performance. Try doing large 'scp's
On Tue, Nov 27, 2001 at 12:44:23PM +0100, Janusz A. Urbanowicz wrote:
Petro wrote/napisa?[a]/schrieb:
On Mon, Nov 26, 2001 at 12:17:32PM +1100, Steve Smith wrote:
3DES is generally considered strong enough. However, it is slow, and
can effect performance. Try doing large 'scp's
On Mon, Nov 26, 2001 at 12:17:32PM +1100, Steve Smith wrote:
3DES is generally considered strong enough. However, it is slow, and
can effect performance. Try doing large 'scp's and switch between
DES/3DES was designed to be implemented in hardware, doing a
software-only
On Mon, Nov 26, 2001 at 12:17:32PM +1100, Steve Smith wrote:
3DES is generally considered strong enough. However, it is slow, and
can effect performance. Try doing large 'scp's and switch between
DES/3DES was designed to be implemented in hardware, doing a
software-only implementation
On Mon, Nov 26, 2001 at 09:04:59AM +0900, Howland, Curtis wrote:
While this may be whipping a greasy stain on the road, it is true that
3DES was created by the government back when private cryptology was
difficult or unknown. I believe it is prudent to consider that it was
allowed to be
On Mon, Nov 26, 2001 at 09:04:59AM +0900, Howland, Curtis wrote:
While this may be whipping a greasy stain on the road, it is true that
3DES was created by the government back when private cryptology was
difficult or unknown. I believe it is prudent to consider that it was
allowed to be used
On Wed, Nov 21, 2001 at 04:34:46PM +0100, Johannes Weiss wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi @all,
I plan to install a mailserver for ca. 800 users, now I planned to make 800
users with shell /bin/bash, home /dev/nul,...
So, I ask you ;)), if this is a good solution, to
On Tue, Nov 20, 2001 at 08:25:36PM -0800, Nathan E Norman wrote:
On Tue, Nov 20, 2001 at 12:01:32PM -0800, J C Lawrence wrote:
On Mon, 19 Nov 2001 21:57:05 -0600
Nathan E Norman Nathan wrote:
On Mon, Nov 19, 2001 at 03:26:50PM -0800, Petro wrote:
But his is hugely off topic, and I'll
On Wed, Nov 21, 2001 at 04:34:46PM +0100, Johannes Weiss wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi @all,
I plan to install a mailserver for ca. 800 users, now I planned to make 800
users with shell /bin/bash, home /dev/nul,...
So, I ask you ;)), if this is a good solution, to
On Tue, Nov 20, 2001 at 02:47:56PM +0100, Florian Bantner wrote:
On Die, 20 Nov 2001, Rolf Kutz wrote:
Florian Bantner ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
A fact about which I'm concerned
even more than about a hack from outside via the internet etc. is
real physical access to the box.
On Tue, Nov 20, 2001 at 03:34:54PM +0100, Rolf Kutz wrote:
Alexander Clouter ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
I am the root guy of my own laptop and I can trust myself :) However a lot
of countries (uk/us and probably others, lots in the eu I would imagine) have
encryption laws, not
On Tue, Nov 20, 2001 at 01:00:58PM -0800, Vineet Kumar wrote:
* J C Lawrence ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [011120 12:04]:
On Mon, 19 Nov 2001 21:57:05 -0600
Nathan E Norman Nathan wrote:
On Mon, Nov 19, 2001 at 03:26:50PM -0800, Petro wrote:
But his is hugely off topic, and I'll go no futher
On Tue, Nov 20, 2001 at 08:25:36PM -0800, Nathan E Norman wrote:
On Tue, Nov 20, 2001 at 12:01:32PM -0800, J C Lawrence wrote:
On Mon, 19 Nov 2001 21:57:05 -0600
Nathan E Norman Nathan wrote:
On Mon, Nov 19, 2001 at 03:26:50PM -0800, Petro wrote:
But his is hugely off topic, and I'll
On Mon, Nov 19, 2001 at 07:57:05PM -0800, Nathan E Norman wrote:
On Mon, Nov 19, 2001 at 03:26:50PM -0800, Petro wrote:
But his is hugely off topic, and I'll go no futher down this road.
Could you at least honor my Mail-Followup-To: header?
I would have if I saw it.
Mutt
On Tue, Nov 20, 2001 at 12:13:05PM +0100, Rolf Kutz wrote:
Florian Bantner ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
A fact about which I'm concerned
even more than about a hack from outside via the internet etc. is
real physical access to the box. Something hackers normaly don't pay
enough attention
On Tue, Nov 20, 2001 at 02:47:56PM +0100, Florian Bantner wrote:
On Die, 20 Nov 2001, Rolf Kutz wrote:
Florian Bantner ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
A fact about which I'm concerned
even more than about a hack from outside via the internet etc. is
real physical access to the box.
On Tue, Nov 20, 2001 at 03:34:54PM +0100, Rolf Kutz wrote:
Alexander Clouter ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
I am the root guy of my own laptop and I can trust myself :) However a lot
of countries (uk/us and probably others, lots in the eu I would imagine)
have
encryption laws, not
On Tue, Nov 20, 2001 at 01:00:58PM -0800, Vineet Kumar wrote:
* J C Lawrence ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [011120 12:04]:
On Mon, 19 Nov 2001 21:57:05 -0600
Nathan E Norman Nathan wrote:
On Mon, Nov 19, 2001 at 03:26:50PM -0800, Petro wrote:
But his is hugely off topic, and I'll go no futher
On Mon, Nov 19, 2001 at 12:30:34AM -0800, Martin Christensen wrote:
Petro == Petro [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Petro On Mon, Nov 19, 2001 at 10:24:05AM +0900, Howland, Curtis
Petro wrote:
ps: From a personal perspective, I think Linux is about where
Windows 3.0 was. This is not a troll
On Mon, Nov 19, 2001 at 12:46:21PM -0800, James Hamilton wrote:
My Gnome/X/Debian GNU/Linux Desktop is much slicker than
anything I have ever been able to do with Windows. The Gnome
apps have a fairly consistent interface as well. There is a steeper and
longer learning curve to learn how
On Mon, Nov 19, 2001 at 02:14:54PM -0800, Nathan E Norman wrote:
On Mon, Nov 19, 2001 at 01:47:40PM -0800, Petro wrote:
enviroments and applications to figure out what it takes to make a
system really consistent and usable for you. Even if you pick some
things that aren't quite
On Mon, Nov 19, 2001 at 07:57:05PM -0800, Nathan E Norman wrote:
On Mon, Nov 19, 2001 at 03:26:50PM -0800, Petro wrote:
But his is hugely off topic, and I'll go no futher down this road.
Could you at least honor my Mail-Followup-To: header?
I would have if I saw it.
Mutt
On Mon, Nov 19, 2001 at 12:30:34AM -0800, Martin Christensen wrote:
Petro == Petro [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Petro On Mon, Nov 19, 2001 at 10:24:05AM +0900, Howland, Curtis
Petro wrote:
ps: From a personal perspective, I think Linux is about where
Windows 3.0 was. This is not a troll
On Mon, Nov 19, 2001 at 12:46:21PM -0800, James Hamilton wrote:
My Gnome/X/Debian GNU/Linux Desktop is much slicker than
anything I have ever been able to do with Windows. The Gnome
apps have a fairly consistent interface as well. There is a steeper and
longer learning curve to learn how to
On Mon, Nov 19, 2001 at 02:14:54PM -0800, Nathan E Norman wrote:
On Mon, Nov 19, 2001 at 01:47:40PM -0800, Petro wrote:
enviroments and applications to figure out what it takes to make a
system really consistent and usable for you. Even if you pick some
things that aren't quite
On Mon, Nov 19, 2001 at 10:24:05AM +0900, Howland, Curtis wrote:
ps: From a personal perspective, I think Linux is about where Windows
3.0 was. This is not a troll, just a usability thing.
No, it's about where win3.11 was in a lot of ways. Modulo the
stability etc.
--
Share and
On Mon, Nov 19, 2001 at 10:24:05AM +0900, Howland, Curtis wrote:
ps: From a personal perspective, I think Linux is about where Windows
3.0 was. This is not a troll, just a usability thing.
No, it's about where win3.11 was in a lot of ways. Modulo the
stability etc.
--
Share and
On Fri, Nov 16, 2001 at 02:36:30PM +0100, Mathias Gygax wrote:
On Fre, Nov 16, 2001 at 04:13:16AM -0900, Ethan Benson wrote:
Root is God. Anything you do on the system is potentially visible to
root.
this is, with the right patches applied, not true.
And who has to apply those
On Fri, Nov 16, 2001 at 05:39:43PM +0100, Mathias Gygax wrote:
On Fre, Nov 16, 2001 at 08:23:27AM -0800, Micah Anderson wrote:
There is no way, nor any reason why, to setup a system in such a way
that the maintainer of the system cannot maintain it.
maintainer is someone else. root is
On Thu, Nov 15, 2001 at 10:17:39PM -0800, Wade Richards wrote:
Also, what makes you thing root knows what he's doing? I suspect that
many people with the root password could not install a tty sniffer or
any other spying tool unless they could type apt-get install ttysniffer.
dude, like
On Thu, Nov 15, 2001 at 11:09:41PM -0800, Craig Dickson wrote:
Wade Richards wrote:
I still say the bottom line is, if you don't trust root, don't use his
machine.
This is the sort of absolutist nonsense that gives security experts a
bad name. After all, anyone armed with a chainsaw can
On Fri, Nov 16, 2001 at 02:36:30PM +0100, Mathias Gygax wrote:
On Fre, Nov 16, 2001 at 04:13:16AM -0900, Ethan Benson wrote:
Root is God. Anything you do on the system is potentially visible to
root.
this is, with the right patches applied, not true.
And who has to apply those
On Fri, Nov 16, 2001 at 05:39:43PM +0100, Mathias Gygax wrote:
On Fre, Nov 16, 2001 at 08:23:27AM -0800, Micah Anderson wrote:
There is no way, nor any reason why, to setup a system in such a way
that the maintainer of the system cannot maintain it.
maintainer is someone else. root is there
On Thu, Nov 15, 2001 at 11:09:41PM -0800, Craig Dickson wrote:
Wade Richards wrote:
I still say the bottom line is, if you don't trust root, don't use his
machine.
This is the sort of absolutist nonsense that gives security experts a
bad name. After all, anyone armed with a chainsaw can
On Mon, Nov 12, 2001 at 05:54:04PM -0800, Ethan Benson wrote:
On Tue, Nov 13, 2001 at 10:10:10AM +0900, Howland, Curtis wrote:
I will gladly grant that the tar file may not exist for the boot
floppies, and that I do not have on hand the CD to check it. It also
may
have been a Potato(e)
On Mon, Nov 12, 2001 at 05:54:04PM -0800, Ethan Benson wrote:
On Tue, Nov 13, 2001 at 10:10:10AM +0900, Howland, Curtis wrote:
I will gladly grant that the tar file may not exist for the boot
floppies, and that I do not have on hand the CD to check it. It also
may
have been a Potato(e)
On Thu, Nov 08, 2001 at 04:57:22PM -0500, Adam Spickler wrote:
Is there a decent Windows FTP application that supports sftp? Unfortunately,
I have to use Windows at work. :/
Well, there's always cygwin. It almost makes Windows liveable.
On Thu, Nov 08, 2001 at 10:55:17PM +0100,
On Mon, Oct 22, 2001 at 09:40:45AM +0300, Lauri Tischler wrote:
Matt Zimmerman wrote:
I think the security secretary, if we have one, should be a Debian
developer.
We have two of them, and they are both card-carrying developers.
Unnghhh...
'Card-carrying' sounds like
On Mon, Oct 22, 2001 at 09:40:45AM +0300, Lauri Tischler wrote:
Matt Zimmerman wrote:
I think the security secretary, if we have one, should be a Debian
developer.
We have two of them, and they are both card-carrying developers.
Unnghhh...
'Card-carrying' sounds like fiery-eyed
On Fri, Oct 19, 2001 at 09:41:22AM -0700, nrvale0 wrote:
maybe have a look at cfengine?
or apt-cache search / freshmeat / google for other options
I was down this road just a few months ago. cfengine is nice except
that the author doesn't believe that 'administrative information' is
On Fri, Oct 19, 2001 at 09:41:22AM -0700, nrvale0 wrote:
maybe have a look at cfengine?
or apt-cache search / freshmeat / google for other options
I was down this road just a few months ago. cfengine is nice except
that the author doesn't believe that 'administrative information' is
On Sat, Sep 15, 2001 at 10:23:45PM +0300, Momchil Velikov wrote:
Dimitri == Dimitri Maziuk [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Dimitri In linux.debian.security, you wrote:
Dimitri If you suspect your machine was r00ted,
Dimitri 1. Take it off the net _now_.
Dimitri 2. If you want to do a
On Sat, Sep 15, 2001 at 10:23:45PM +0300, Momchil Velikov wrote:
Dimitri == Dimitri Maziuk [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Dimitri In linux.debian.security, you wrote:
Dimitri If you suspect your machine was r00ted,
Dimitri 1. Take it off the net _now_.
Dimitri 2. If you want to do a post-mortem,
On Sat, Sep 01, 2001 at 01:10:04PM +1000, CaT wrote:
On Fri, Aug 31, 2001 at 10:48:37PM -0400, Layne wrote:
SUCK MY COCK IF YOU SEND ME ANY MORE SPAM MAIL
*gets out a pippet, a microscope and a vacuum cleaner*
I'd suggest using a sledge hammer with that pipette.
A clue for Layne:
On Fri, Aug 31, 2001 at 11:54:40PM -0400, Ed Street wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello,
If not is anyone up for a road trip? ;)
Usually.
We'll write it off as a Physical Security Seminar.
--
Share and Enjoy.
On Sat, Sep 01, 2001 at 03:04:03PM +1000, CaT wrote:
On Sat, Sep 01, 2001 at 12:44:15AM -0400, Layne wrote:
I ASKED YOU MORONS NOT TO SEND ME ANYMORE E-MAIL BUT HERE YOU GO AGAIN. IS
THERE ANY INTELLIGENT PEOPLE THERE OR IS THE PLACE RUN BY BABOONS. i'M
Oook?
Yes, I'm looking for
On Sat, Sep 01, 2001 at 03:04:03PM +1000, CaT wrote:
On Sat, Sep 01, 2001 at 12:44:15AM -0400, Layne wrote:
I ASKED YOU MORONS NOT TO SEND ME ANYMORE E-MAIL BUT HERE YOU GO AGAIN. IS
THERE ANY INTELLIGENT PEOPLE THERE OR IS THE PLACE RUN BY BABOONS. i'M
Oook?
Yes, I'm looking for
On Fri, Aug 31, 2001 at 01:07:05AM -0700, Christian Kurz wrote:
On 01-08-30 Brian P. Flaherty wrote:
I have had a lot of problems running non-Debian software when I
disable ident. It seems like the licensing daemons expect to find
What the hell is a licensing daemon?
It's a
On Tue, Aug 28, 2001 at 09:23:47AM -0400, Sunny Dubey wrote:
Hey,
I've got a slight problem, at school we run two major networks, one half is
Novell Netware based, and the other half is unix based. We basically one
centralized system of authentication, so that user don't have to remember
1 - 100 of 106 matches
Mail list logo
