Hi Ricardo,
On Friday 03 October 2003 22:51, Ricardo wrote:
I found on my apache´s log a lot of messages like
*.*.*.* - - [Date] GET http://someStrangeOrExternalDomain.com HTP1.0/ 404
206 - - I saw on many lists and FAQs some indications that the problem
may be caused because of an
Hi Ricardo,
On Friday 03 October 2003 22:51, Ricardo wrote:
I found on my apache´s log a lot of messages like
*.*.*.* - - [Date] GET http://someStrangeOrExternalDomain.com HTP1.0/ 404
206 - - I saw on many lists and FAQs some indications that the problem
may be caused because of an
On Mon, 22 Sep 2003, Ted Roby wrote:
My secalert account for these lists is being drenched with 40 to 70 of
these fake Microsoft Update emails per day.
My filters on my client dump them to a Junk folder, but I would prefer
it if my Exim filter would do the job at the server level instead. I
On Wed, 17 Sep 2003, Gaël Le Mignot wrote:
What precisely have they done? I'd not heard about
their latest idiocy...
They decided to answer to all requests for a non-existing domain in
.com or .net with the IP of some of their computers, hosting an
advertising page...
Please
On Wed, 17 Sep 2003, Gaël Le Mignot wrote:
What precisely have they done? I'd not heard about
their latest idiocy...
They decided to answer to all requests for a non-existing domain in
.com or .net with the IP of some of their computers, hosting an
advertising page...
Please
On Tue, 16 Sep 2003, Alexander Neumann wrote:
According to Wichert, the security team is already working on an update.
Is there an emergency patch/workaround for this, if disabling ssh is not
an option? Are systems with Privilege Separation affected?
Thanks,
Thomas
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
On Tue, 16 Sep 2003, Steve Suehring wrote:
Actually, there is a patch for buffer.c:
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/src/crypto/openssh/buffer.c.diff?r1=1.1.1.6r2=1.1.1.7f=h
I've applied that patch to woody's ssh source, rebuilt it, and installed
it on a number of servers already.
On Tue, 16 Sep 2003, Alexander Neumann wrote:
According to Wichert, the security team is already working on an update.
Is there an emergency patch/workaround for this, if disabling ssh is not
an option? Are systems with Privilege Separation affected?
Thanks,
Thomas
Hi Frank,
On Fri, 5 Sep 2003, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
char path[256];
sprintf( path, some string/%s, packagename);
There are no further checks as I can see. I'm not very experienced in C
programming and don't know much about the details of exploiting buffer
overflows or the like...
Is
Hi Frank,
On Fri, 5 Sep 2003, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
char path[256];
sprintf( path, some string/%s, packagename);
There are no further checks as I can see. I'm not very experienced in C
programming and don't know much about the details of exploiting buffer
overflows or the like...
Is
Who are mpuk and why are they censoring debian's mailing list, apparently
from several different senders?
On Sat, 30 Aug 2003, System Attendant wrote:
eManager Notification *
The following message was blocked because it contains sensitive content.
Source
Who are mpuk and why are they censoring debian's mailing list, apparently
from several different senders?
On Sat, 30 Aug 2003, System Attendant wrote:
eManager Notification *
The following message was blocked because it contains sensitive content.
Source
On Fri, 16 May 2003, Andreas Vitz wrote:
May 15 09:37:07 kai-router pppoe[180]: Bogus PPPoE length field (111)
May 15 09:47:18 kai-router pppoe[180]: Bogus PPPoE length field (172)
i get them day by day, since a week or so.
I use a adsl connection.
so my final question have i been hacked
On Wednesday 07 May 2003 13:54, Jay Kline wrote:
This is still prety complex, if the end result is just to allow access to
port 22.
SSH is pretty secure, there have been very few problems with ssh that allow
someone without an account to gain access to the system its on. If you
take all
You STUPID IDIOT.
Can't you read.
Jesus your IQ must be 80.
On Sun, 17 Nov 2002, Antoine Patois wrote:
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of
You STUPID IDIOT.
Can't you read.
Jesus your IQ must be 80.
On Sun, 17 Nov 2002, Antoine Patois wrote:
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 15 Nov 2002, Yogesh Sharma wrote:
I think debian list has to add some filter on subject and if subject
contains unsubscribe redirect that email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
or else we have add following message in multiple languages.
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of
On 15 Nov 2002, Yogesh Sharma wrote:
I think debian list has to add some filter on subject and if subject
contains unsubscribe redirect that email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
or else we have add following message in multiple languages.
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of
Are you thick or what?
On Fri, 15 Nov 2002, Stone wrote:
Pozdrawiam
Stone
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe.
Are you thick or what?
On Fri, 15 Nov 2002, Stone wrote:
Pozdrawiam
Stone
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sun, 10 Nov 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
how can i block these bastards from korea from spaming me 10 times per day?
Set your mail server up to filter all Korean mail (that is, if you don't
have any friends or relatives in Korea).
There is a site, http://www.blackholes.us which has a
On Sun, 10 Nov 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
how can i block these bastards from korea from spaming me 10 times per day?
Set your mail server up to filter all Korean mail (that is, if you don't
have any friends or relatives in Korea).
There is a site, http://www.blackholes.us which has a
On Sat, 21 Sep 2002, Petar D Donchev wrote:
I have linux woody box with 2.2.20 kernel.
i receive some strange messages in my log like this:
Sep 21 00:59:49 cs kernel: Oops:
Sep 21 00:59:49 cs kernel: CPU:0
Sep 21 00:59:49 cs kernel: EIP:0010:[find_inode+32/72]
Sep 21 00:59:49
On Sat, 21 Sep 2002, Petar D Donchev wrote:
I have linux woody box with 2.2.20 kernel.
i receive some strange messages in my log like this:
Sep 21 00:59:49 cs kernel: Oops:
Sep 21 00:59:49 cs kernel: CPU:0
Sep 21 00:59:49 cs kernel: EIP:0010:[find_inode+32/72]
Sep 21 00:59:49
to check if netstat has
been tampered with:
$ dpkg -S /bin/netstat
net-tools: /bin/netstat
$ debsums net-tools
Hope this was useful. Remember that auditing the integrity of the system
files is only a small part of securing your system, but it is an important
one.
Regards,
Thomas Horsten
[EMAIL
to check if netstat has
been tampered with:
$ dpkg -S /bin/netstat
net-tools: /bin/netstat
$ debsums net-tools
Hope this was useful. Remember that auditing the integrity of the system
files is only a small part of securing your system, but it is an important
one.
Regards,
Thomas Horsten
[EMAIL
On Thu, 8 Aug 2002, Roger Ward wrote:
Which bug? this url does not work
Seems he typed the URL manually or something, the last character is an O
and not 0, I found the correct article:
http://www.securiteam.com/unixfocus/5QP020K35O.html
// Thomas
27 matches
Mail list logo
