. Most distributions
kindly add all these helpful mailcap entries.
my mailcap file (made by Debian installation) doesn't have any of this
capabilities. Cannot verify for others distributions but that's a Debian
list here anyway ...
--
Vincent Hanquez
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL
On Mon, Jun 16, 2003 at 10:54:54AM +0200, Mario Ohnewald wrote:
Not even with sudo?
Hmm, this way it will work
--
Tab
pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Mon, Jun 16, 2003 at 10:22:49AM +0200, Mario Ohnewald wrote:
Hello!
I want to chroot a application/gameserver.
What is the better/securest way?
1.) Chroot /path and then do a su -s /bin/sh user -c start.sh
or
2.) su -s /bin/sh user and then do the chroot /path as normal user and
On Mon, Jun 16, 2003 at 10:54:54AM +0200, Mario Ohnewald wrote:
Not even with sudo?
Hmm, this way it will work
--
Tab
pgpNe4F7mIpKh.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Thu, Dec 19, 2002 at 08:42:38AM -0200, Samuel Lucas Vaz de Mello wrote:
Hi all!
I'm getting this messages in the syslog:
Dec 18 10:07:55 debian syslog-ng[164]: STATS: dropped 0
Some idea about what this mean?
Regards,
Hi,
this message is syslog-ng notice message,
On Thu, Dec 19, 2002 at 08:42:05AM -0500, David B Harris wrote:
snip really, really complex and nasty ways of removing STATS messages
But remove stating messages is not what I've done..
The patch drops ONLY 0 droppet packet message. others are logged.
options { stats(3600); };
I've check the
On Fri, Oct 18, 2002 at 02:58:44PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Woody
host:/home/przemoltelnet 192.168.x.y ssh
Trying 192.168.x.y...
Connected to 192.168.x.y.
Escape character is '^]'.
SSH-2.0-OpenSSH_3.4p1 Debian 1:3.4p1-1
How can I disable the message ?
you can't without
On Fri, Oct 18, 2002 at 02:58:44PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Woody
host:/home/przemoltelnet 192.168.x.y ssh
Trying 192.168.x.y...
Connected to 192.168.x.y.
Escape character is '^]'.
SSH-2.0-OpenSSH_3.4p1 Debian 1:3.4p1-1
How can I disable the message ?
you can't without
On Sat, Sep 21, 2002 at 08:31:21AM +0200, Petar D Donchev wrote:
I have linux woody box with 2.2.20 kernel.
i receive some strange messages in my log like this:
[snip]
I use this bot to my local debian fmirror.
Any body knows what is the problem?
--
It's seem you have problem with
On Sat, Sep 21, 2002 at 08:31:21AM +0200, Petar D Donchev wrote:
I have linux woody box with 2.2.20 kernel.
i receive some strange messages in my log like this:
[snip]
I use this bot to my local debian fmirror.
Any body knows what is the problem?
--
It's seem you have problem with ext2
On Fri, Aug 30, 2002 at 05:42:51PM +0200, Jan-Hendrik Palic wrote:
I have created a user test with pass test on Linux and Solaris:
/etc/shadow on Linux:
test:$1$mT.fKI5L$Fgq6C.AKbkzGfCU.RDDqj.:11929:0:9:7:-1:-1:134549020
/etc/shadow on Solaris:
test:TCs9gC4bJy8rg:11929::
the
On Sat, Aug 03, 2002 at 06:06:03PM +0100, Dale Amon wrote:
What would be interesting about Port 1433? I seem to be seeing
hits on it on different, well seperated networks. Is it a
destination for worms and virii?
There is the MS SQL Server Worm which aim this port.
--
Tab
On Fri, Aug 02, 2002 at 02:27:11PM +0300, Halil Demirezen wrote:
I installl my Debian system on 29th July. and i get the packets from
mirror security.debian... as anyone can say , should i be worried.?
as the others said, no.
only Openbsd source package has been trojaned
--
Tab
On Fri, Aug 02, 2002 at 03:36:53PM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
Vincent Hanquez [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
as the others said, no.
only Openbsd source package has been trojaned
No, both 3.4p1 and 3.2.2p1 (portable versions) have been changed, too.
sorry i've forget a word. I was speaking
On Fri, Aug 02, 2002 at 05:10:11PM +0300, Halil Demirezen wrote:
I wanna make it clear.
We are using OpenSSH_3.4p1 Debian 1:3.4p1-1, SSH protocols 1.5/2.0,
OpenSSL 0x0090603f
and we installed the ssh from the deb packages using
apt-get install utility.
I wonder if there is any risk
On Thu, Aug 01, 2002 at 08:06:21AM -0400, Raymond Wood wrote:
Hi,
I have no idea if this affects Debian in any way, shape, or form
-- but better safe than sorry, so here it is FYI...
Cheers,
Raymond
AFAIK this doesn't affect debian package because .tar.gz was
downloaded from
On Tue, May 07, 2002 at 10:26:43PM +0800, Patrick Hsieh wrote:
Hello list,
Is there anyone having any suggestion to tune the /proc/sys/net/ipv4/*
to avoid tcp syn flood attack?
there a kernel option IP: TCP syncookie support to do that
you can activate it with :
echo 1
On Wed, May 08, 2002 at 01:45:32AM +0800, Patrick Hsieh wrote:
But this option seems to bring some side-effect. Is there any
alternative?
imho the better way is to use syncookie.
problems written on the ip-sysctl documentation are more or less normal.
there's not a very good way to know if
On Tue, May 07, 2002 at 10:26:43PM +0800, Patrick Hsieh wrote:
Hello list,
Is there anyone having any suggestion to tune the /proc/sys/net/ipv4/*
to avoid tcp syn flood attack?
there a kernel option IP: TCP syncookie support to do that
you can activate it with :
echo 1
On Wed, May 08, 2002 at 01:45:32AM +0800, Patrick Hsieh wrote:
But this option seems to bring some side-effect. Is there any
alternative?
imho the better way is to use syncookie.
problems written on the ip-sysctl documentation are more or less normal.
there's not a very good way to know if
On Sun, May 05, 2002 at 07:23:29PM +0200, Tim van Erven wrote:
I don't know much about OpenSSH or PAM internals, but how about adding
an option to PAM to make authentication always fail for root and move
all this authentication stuff into PAM.
you could use pam to deny root access with the
On Sun, May 05, 2002 at 07:23:29PM +0200, Tim van Erven wrote:
I don't know much about OpenSSH or PAM internals, but how about adding
an option to PAM to make authentication always fail for root and move
all this authentication stuff into PAM.
you could use pam to deny root access with the
22 matches
Mail list logo
