Aside from the fact that it's a pretty big IF; I'm not aware of too many
mail clients that use pagers. mutt uses vi, pine uses pico, X based MUAs
certainly don't use most.. perhaps mail(x) or something similar use
it, but that's not all too common. Certainly not enough, IMO, to classify
this as
On Tue, Sep 18, 2001 at 05:22:41PM -0400, Andres Salomon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Tue, Sep 18, 2001 at 05:01:59PM -0400, Aaron M. Ucko wrote:
Andres Salomon [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
How is this a remote exploit?
If I know somebody uses most as a pager for mail, I can send
My point is, it's not a daemon, it's not associated w/ any type of network
service, it's not associated w/ any clients that regularly receive untrusted
data from outside sources, and it's not even used by default on most
people's boxes (less, if installed, will be used instead of most by
* Andres Salomon ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [010918 17:40]:
My point is, it's not a daemon, it's not associated w/ any type of network
service, it's not associated w/ any clients that regularly receive untrusted
data from outside sources, and it's not even used by default on most
people's boxes
Aside from the fact that it's a pretty big IF; I'm not aware of too many
mail clients that use pagers. mutt uses vi, pine uses pico, X based MUAs
certainly don't use most.. perhaps mail(x) or something similar use
it, but that's not all too common. Certainly not enough, IMO, to classify
this as
Andres Salomon wrote:
Aside from the fact that it's a pretty big IF; I'm not aware of too many
mail clients that use pagers. mutt uses vi
pager != editor. Mutt has a built-in pager but can be configured to use
an external one if you prefer.
Craig
Not all mutt users use vi, as a pager I use most, as an editor I use
jed. These things can be configured.
On Tue, 18 Sep 2001, Andres Salomon wrote:
Aside from the fact that it's a pretty big IF; I'm not aware of too many
mail clients that use pagers. mutt uses vi, pine uses pico, X based
On Tue, Sep 18, 2001 at 05:22:41PM -0400, Andres Salomon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Tue, Sep 18, 2001 at 05:01:59PM -0400, Aaron M. Ucko wrote:
Andres Salomon [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
How is this a remote exploit?
If I know somebody uses most as a pager for mail, I can send
My point is, it's not a daemon, it's not associated w/ any type of network
service, it's not associated w/ any clients that regularly receive untrusted
data from outside sources, and it's not even used by default on most
people's boxes (less, if installed, will be used instead of most by default).
* Andres Salomon ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [010918 17:40]:
My point is, it's not a daemon, it's not associated w/ any type of network
service, it's not associated w/ any clients that regularly receive untrusted
data from outside sources, and it's not even used by default on most
people's boxes
10 matches
Mail list logo
