On Wednesday 19 January 2005 04:45, David Mandelberg wrote:
Attached.
Save to your GNOME/KDE desktop (like many newbies do) and double click the
new icon. .desktop files (currently) don't need the x bit set to work, so
no chmod'ing is necessary.
Hmm, attached a screenshot how every MUA
Rick Moen wrote:
Quoting David Mandelberg ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
Attached.
Save to your GNOME/KDE desktop (like many newbies do) and double click
the new icon. .desktop files (currently) don't need the x bit set to
work, so no chmod'ing is necessary.
I'm sorry, but the question was:
* Rick Moen:
Please advise this mailing list of which specific Linux or BSD MUA (or
specific configuration thereof) is willing to execute a received
binary or script attachment.
mutt and Gnus are, in typical configurations. Most distributions
kindly add all these helpful mailcap entries.
On Wed, Jan 19, 2005 at 12:49:57PM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote:
* Rick Moen:
Please advise this mailing list of which specific Linux or BSD MUA (or
specific configuration thereof) is willing to execute a received
binary or script attachment.
mutt and Gnus are, in typical
Florian Weimer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
mutt and Gnus are, in typical configurations. Most distributions
kindly add all these helpful mailcap entries.
Could you point out a mailcap entry that causes the file to be
*executed*?
Because running gqview $file.jpg is very different from running
* Florent Rougon:
Florian Weimer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
mutt and Gnus are, in typical configurations. Most distributions
kindly add all these helpful mailcap entries.
Could you point out a mailcap entry that causes the file to be
*executed*?
For complex file formats, there is no clear
On Wed, Jan 19, 2005 at 04:29:46PM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote:
For complex file formats, there is no clear distinction between
opening a file and executing it.
Sure there is. For some filetypes execution is an intended effect; that
is, you expect arbitrary code to run. For other filetypes there's
Quoting Florian Weimer ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
mutt and Gnus are, in typical configurations. Most distributions
kindly add all these helpful mailcap entries.
Perhaps you need assistance comprehending the word specific (used
twice in my question)? I await with interest your achieving that
Rick Moen wrote:
Quoting David Mandelberg ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
You also asked a question about something I didn't say (I said that
the person had to open it).
Actually, no, you didn't. (Presumably you intended to, though.)
Your question spoke of opening a particularly-named
Rick Moen wrote:
Quoting David Mandelberg ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
Do you mean to say that opening message.txt\t\t\t.desktop which
happens to be a freedesktop.org compliant launcher for the program rm
-rf $HOME is safe because it's designed for people running one of the
F/OSS products GNOME or KDE
Quoting David Mandelberg ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
Attached.
Save to your GNOME/KDE desktop (like many newbies do) and double click
the new icon. .desktop files (currently) don't need the x bit set to
work, so no chmod'ing is necessary.
I'm sorry, but the question was:
Please advise this
On Tue, 18 Jan 2005, David Mandelberg wrote:
Save to your GNOME/KDE desktop (like many newbies do) and double click the
new
icon. .desktop files (currently) don't need the x bit set to work, so no
chmod'ing is necessary.
that'd be dumb of the user
This one is pretty harmless (it just
12 matches
Mail list logo
