Re: 9n216.13.107.82

2016-06-09 Thread Johnnyb
Stop your spam chat please Original Message On 9 juin 2016 11:50, Joel Rees wrote: Can I suggest to those who responded to these that kneejerk reactions aren't useful? And that, if you really don't understand the nature of these, there is quite a lot of information to be

Re: 9n216.13.107.82

2016-06-09 Thread Paul Wise
On Thu, Jun 9, 2016 at 5:50 PM, Joel Rees wrote: > Can I suggest to those who responded to these that kneejerk reactions > aren't useful? The people who got the spam with a spoofed address are unlikely to be subscribed to this list. > FTR, we assume that someone was spoofing luciano's email

Re: 9n216.13.107.82

2016-06-09 Thread Joel Rees
Can I suggest to those who responded to these that kneejerk reactions aren't useful? And that, if you really don't understand the nature of these, there is quite a lot of information to be gained by looking at the raw source and using a search site (instead of jumping to the urls to see what they