On Sat, Apr 17, 2004 at 10:00:23AM -0400, Michael Stone wrote:
On Thu, Apr 15, 2004 at 08:19:24PM +1000, Joshua Goodall wrote:
In other words, people are ready to pounce, and that short gap of time
after server installation and before installing patched code cannot be
considered safe. Quite
On Sat, Apr 17, 2004 at 10:00:23AM -0400, Michael Stone wrote:
On Thu, Apr 15, 2004 at 08:19:24PM +1000, Joshua Goodall wrote:
In other words, people are ready to pounce, and that short gap of time
after server installation and before installing patched code cannot be
considered safe. Quite
On Thu, Apr 15, 2004 at 08:19:24PM +1000, Joshua Goodall wrote:
In other words, people are ready to pounce, and that short gap of time
after server installation and before installing patched code cannot be
considered safe. Quite the opposite.
Note that if you're doing a network install you can
On Thu, Apr 15, 2004 at 08:19:24PM +1000, Joshua Goodall wrote:
In other words, people are ready to pounce, and that short gap of time
after server installation and before installing patched code cannot be
considered safe. Quite the opposite.
Note that if you're doing a network install you
On Thu, 15 Apr 2004 07:56 pm, Tim Nicholas wrote:
If I recall correctly it is assumed that users will not run on the
boot floppy kernels after the initial system installation. They are
expected to install a more appropriate kernel after finishing the
install.
As such there will be no patch
On Thu, 15 Apr 2004 07:56 pm, Tim Nicholas wrote:
If I recall correctly it is assumed that users will not run on the
boot floppy kernels after the initial system installation. They are
expected to install a more appropriate kernel after finishing the
install.
As such there will be no patch
6 matches
Mail list logo
