A colleague of mine successfully setup OpenLDAP and has interfaced several server
applications to it that were originally designed for Netscape Directory Server. It's
running fast and stable so far.
jc
On Sat, Mar 17, 2001 at 09:25:40AM -0700, Moe Harley wrote:
I'm playing with the idea of
A colleague of mine successfully setup OpenLDAP and has interfaced several
server applications to it that were originally designed for Netscape Directory
Server. It's running fast and stable so far.
jc
On Sat, Mar 17, 2001 at 09:25:40AM -0700, Moe Harley wrote:
I'm playing with the idea of
I'm playing with the idea of adding an ldap service/daemon to my debian
machine. But before running one, I wanted to get a good idea of what
the general opinion of ldap servers is as far as security is concerned. I
also
was wondering if anyone had any opinions on which one I should use?
The only
I'm playing with the idea of adding an ldap service/daemon to my debian
machine. But before running one, I wanted to get a good idea of what
the general opinion of ldap servers is as far as security is concerned. I
also
was wondering if anyone had any opinions on which one I should use?
The only
The libnns-ldap 122-1 update made it into r1 without ever having an
official Security Alert announcement, I dunno how big of a deal this is,
but I figured I should dredge it up incase it needed be addressed
officially. Anyone?
--
Jamie Heilman
The libnns-ldap 122-1 update made it into r1 without ever having an
official Security Alert announcement, I dunno how big of a deal this is,
but I figured I should dredge it up incase it needed be addressed
officially. Anyone?
--
Jamie Heilman
Previously Jamie Heilman wrote:
The libnns-ldap 122-1 update made it into r1 without ever having an
official Security Alert announcement, I dunno how big of a deal this is,
but I figured I should dredge it up incase it needed be addressed
officially. Anyone?
I know, it's on the list of
I know, it's on the list of things to do. Since it's already in there it
has a lower priority then fixing things that don't have a fix yet
though.
Thats cool, it hasn't been compiled for alpha yet either so I guess there's
still work to be done.
--
Jamie Heilman
Hi guys, a security related bug was recently fixed in libnss-ldap whereby a race
condition could be exploited to make nscd deadlock.
Both potato and woody are affected by this bug: I already have uploaded a fixed
version in potato proposed-updates (110-3) and I'm working on the woody
upload; I
Don't race to install 110-3, it has unresolved symbols.
See bug #76018
--
Jamie Heilman http://audible.transient.net/~jamie/
"You came all this way way without saying squat and now you're trying
to tell me a '56 Chevy can beat a '47 Buick in a dead quarter mile?
I liked
Hi guys, a security related bug was recently fixed in libnss-ldap whereby a race
condition could be exploited to make nscd deadlock.
Both potato and woody are affected by this bug: I already have uploaded a fixed
version in potato proposed-updates (110-3) and I'm working on the woody
upload; I
Don't race to install 110-3, it has unresolved symbols.
See bug #76018
--
Jamie Heilman http://audible.transient.net/~jamie/
You came all this way way without saying squat and now you're trying
to tell me a '56 Chevy can beat a '47 Buick in a dead quarter mile?
I liked you
12 matches
Mail list logo