Re: IPSec VPN and Watchguard Firebox 2

2002-08-22 Thread Thorsten Sauter
Hi Marcel, Does anybody know if there are any news concerning freeswan and Watchguard Firebox 2 interoperability? Some time ago I read that the two would not work together, as Watchguard does not use triple DES during the negotiation phase. Is there a patch around for freeswan? The

Re: IPSec VPN and Watchguard Firebox 2

2002-08-22 Thread Alan James
Apparently it is possible with Firebox 2 using ipsec manual: http://lists.freeswan.org/pipermail/users/2001-June/000566.html

Re: RE: IPSec VPN

2002-08-21 Thread Rcca
. Idézve: Dátum: 2002/8/14 12:55:18. Feladó: Johan Segernas [EMAIL PROTECTED]. Feladó: Johan Segernas [EMAIL PROTECTED] Címzett:'Jeff' [EMAIL PROTECTED], debian-security@lists.debian.org Tárgy: RE: IPSec VPN Dátum: Wed, 14 Aug 2002 12:55:18 +0200 - If so which is compatible

Re: IPSec VPN and Watchguard Firebox 2

2002-08-21 Thread Marcel Weber
: IPSec VPN Dátum: Wed, 14 Aug 2002 12:55:18 +0200 - If so which is compatible? Is FreeSWan compatible? FreeSWan is compatible, but only as a Branch Office tunnel, not as a dynamic Client tunnel. Check with the administrator of the Contivity VPN Switch on whether he/she is willing to set

Re: IPSec VPN and Watchguard Firebox 2

2002-08-21 Thread Geoff Crompton
On Wed, Aug 21, 2002 at 12:20:27PM +0200, Marcel Weber wrote: Hash: SHA1 Hi Does anybody know if there are any news concerning freeswan and Watchguard Firebox 2 interoperability? Some time ago I read that the two would not work together, as Watchguard does not use triple DES during

RE: IPSec VPN

2002-08-14 Thread Johan Segernas
Title: RE: IPSec VPN - If so which is compatible? Is FreeSWan compatible? FreeSWan is compatible, but only as a Branch Office tunnel, not as a dynamic Client tunnel. Check with the administrator of the Contivity VPN Switch on whether he/she is willing to set it up. I didn't read

RE: IPSec VPN

2002-08-13 Thread Jens Hafner
Thanks to all who took time to reply to my questions about the VPN network. After reading the articles you directed me at (including the Freeswan page and the VPN Masquerade HOWTO, I find that it might be a better idea to not masquerade the VPN client on the WIN2K machine but to install an VPN

Re: IPSec VPN

2002-08-13 Thread Dale Amon
On Tue, Aug 13, 2002 at 09:28:37AM +0200, Jens Hafner wrote: Thanks to all who took time to reply to my questions about the VPN network. After reading the articles you directed me at (including the Freeswan page and the VPN Masquerade HOWTO, I find that it might be a better idea to not

Re: IPSec VPN

2002-08-13 Thread Jeff
Jens Hafner, 2002-Aug-13 09:28 +0200: Thanks to all who took time to reply to my questions about the VPN network. After reading the articles you directed me at (including the Freeswan page and the VPN Masquerade HOWTO, I find that it might be a better idea to not masquerade the VPN client

Re: IPSec VPN

2002-08-11 Thread Noah L. Meyerhans
On Sun, Aug 11, 2002 at 05:40:15PM +0200, Jens Hafner wrote: directly connected to the Internet (e.g. by a dialup connection). Things start to break as soon as I connect the laptop to my private network (192.168.0.0/24) whose default gateway is a debian (woody, kernel 2.2.19) box. I configured

Re: IPSec VPN

2002-08-11 Thread Jeff
Jens Hafner, 2002-Aug-11 17:40 +0200: Hi, I'm trying to connect my Win2k professional Laptop to my company's VPN. I am using the Nortel Extranet Access Client V02_62.33, which uses the IPSec protocol. Everything just works fine as long as the laptop is directly connected to the Internet

Re: IPSec VPN

2002-08-11 Thread Quietman
On Sun, Aug 11, 2002 at 05:40:15PM +0200, Jens Hafner wrote: I'm trying to connect my Win2k professional Laptop to my company's VPN. The VPN-Masquerade-HOWTO has full instructions on the patching of a 2.2 kernel to masquerade IPSEC. It is available at