why not ssmtp (small smtp) ?
does it fullfill the requierements?
-Original Message-
From: Corey Halpin [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: March 5, 2002 17:56 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:Re: Unidentified subject! [MTA for Firewall System]
B Beck, 2002-Mar-05 13:18
why not ssmtp (small smtp) ?
does it fullfill the requierements?
-Original Message-
From: Corey Halpin [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: March 5, 2002 17:56 PM
To: debian-security@lists.debian.org
Subject:Re: Unidentified subject! [MTA for Firewall System]
B Beck, 2002-Mar
B Beck, 2002-Mar-05 13:18 -0600:
Greetings all
I'm currently building a firewall/router based on GNU/debian. This is my first time
with such a project as I have previously used pre-packaged or configured firewalling
solutions. I'd like the control of building it myself this time :) I'm
B Beck, 2002-Mar-05 13:18 -0600:
However, my question/concern is this: I'm looking for an MTA to satisfy
dependencies for cron and logcheck.
I use Postfix on my firewall and it's been great.
I also use postfix.
I would point out that postfix might be better for a firewall
B Beck, 2002-Mar-05 13:18 -0600:
Greetings all
I'm currently building a firewall/router based on GNU/debian. This is my
first time with such a project as I have previously used pre-packaged or
configured firewalling solutions. I'd like the control of building it myself
this time :) I'm
B Beck, 2002-Mar-05 13:18 -0600:
However, my question/concern is this: I'm looking for an MTA to satisfy
dependencies for cron and logcheck.
I use Postfix on my firewall and it's been great.
I also use postfix.
I would point out that postfix might be better for a firewall
6 matches
Mail list logo
