* nrvale0
| maybe have a look at cfengine?
| or apt-cache search / freshmeat / google for other options
|
| I was down this road just a few months ago. cfengine is nice except
| that the author doesn't believe that 'administrative information' is
| something that should be protected and thus
* nrvale0
| maybe have a look at cfengine?
| or apt-cache search / freshmeat / google for other options
|
| I was down this road just a few months ago. cfengine is nice except
| that the author doesn't believe that 'administrative information' is
| something that should be protected and thus
On Fri, Oct 19, 2001 at 05:54:28PM +0300, Juha J?ykk? wrote:
I was wondering if there are any secure methods of centrally
managing the versions of certain files on Debian machines.
The problem you describe (in the part of your email that I deleted) seems
to be not wanting to give access to
On Fri, Oct 19, 2001 at 05:54:28PM +0300, Juha J?ykk? wrote:
I was wondering if there are any secure methods of centrally
managing the versions of certain files on Debian machines.
The problem you describe (in the part of your email that I deleted) seems
to be not wanting to give access to
I was wondering if there are any secure methods of centrally
managing the versions of certain files on Debian machines. I currently
have a woody, two sids and several potatos which need to be kept up to
date. The security patches are not much of a concern since they are
quite infrequent (except
On Fri, 19 Oct 2001 at 17:54:28 +0300, Juha Jykk wrote:
[...]
case, which is the safest option? Currently I am considering
configuring sudo to enable the admin user to execute a single script
(mods 0700) without a password or just chmod that script 4700. I am not
3. Break into one of the other machines, use the suided script to
^
I can't answer your questions - I know too little. Just one remark:
AFAIK, Linux doesn't support suided shell scripts. At least it didn't do
that a few years
On Fri, Oct 19, 2001 at 06:33:43PM +0300, Juha J?ykk? wrote:
3. Break into one of the other machines, use the suided script to
^
I can't answer your questions - I know too little. Just one remark:
AFAIK, Linux doesn't support
On Fri, Oct 19, 2001 at 05:54:28PM +0300, Juha J?ykk? wrote:
I was wondering if there are any secure methods of centrally
managing the versions of certain files on Debian machines. I currently
have a woody, two sids and several potatos which need to be kept up to
date. The security patches
changes via cvs to a nfs mount, all the client machines download changes
via a cron job.
Whoooa... nfs? Security++... I could consider using some secure
networked file system, though but I doubt cron would be a good idea.
Or maybe it is. Anyone any concerns?
Another thing that crossed my
maybe have a look at cfengine?
or apt-cache search / freshmeat / google for other options
I was down this road just a few months ago. cfengine is nice except
that the author doesn't believe that 'administrative information' is
something that should be protected and thus has no plans to move
On Fri, Oct 19, 2001 at 09:41:22AM -0700, nrvale0 wrote:
maybe have a look at cfengine?
or apt-cache search / freshmeat / google for other options
I was down this road just a few months ago. cfengine is nice except
that the author doesn't believe that 'administrative information' is
* Juha J?ykk? ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [011019 07:57]:
I was wondering if there are any secure methods of centrally
managing the versions of certain files on Debian machines. I currently
have a woody, two sids and several potatos which need to be kept up to
date. The security patches are not
I was wondering if there are any secure methods of centrally
managing the versions of certain files on Debian machines. I currently
have a woody, two sids and several potatos which need to be kept up to
date. The security patches are not much of a concern since they are
quite infrequent (except
On Fri, 19 Oct 2001 at 17:54:28 +0300, Juha Jäykkä wrote:
[...]
case, which is the safest option? Currently I am considering
configuring sudo to enable the admin user to execute a single script
(mods 0700) without a password or just chmod that script 4700. I am not
3. Break into one of the other machines, use the suided script to
^
I can't answer your questions - I know too little. Just one remark:
AFAIK, Linux doesn't support suided shell scripts. At least it didn't do
that a few years ago
On Fri, Oct 19, 2001 at 06:33:43PM +0300, Juha J?ykk? wrote:
3. Break into one of the other machines, use the suided script to
^
I can't answer your questions - I know too little. Just one remark:
AFAIK, Linux doesn't support
On Fri, Oct 19, 2001 at 05:54:28PM +0300, Juha J?ykk? wrote:
I was wondering if there are any secure methods of centrally
managing the versions of certain files on Debian machines. I currently
have a woody, two sids and several potatos which need to be kept up to
date. The security patches
changes via cvs to a nfs mount, all the client machines download changes
via a cron job.
Whoooa... nfs? Security++... I could consider using some secure
networked file system, though but I doubt cron would be a good idea.
Or maybe it is. Anyone any concerns?
Another thing that crossed my
maybe have a look at cfengine?
or apt-cache search / freshmeat / google for other options
I was down this road just a few months ago. cfengine is nice except
that the author doesn't believe that 'administrative information' is
something that should be protected and thus has no plans to move
On Fri, Oct 19, 2001 at 09:41:22AM -0700, nrvale0 wrote:
maybe have a look at cfengine?
or apt-cache search / freshmeat / google for other options
I was down this road just a few months ago. cfengine is nice except
that the author doesn't believe that 'administrative information' is
* Juha J?ykk? ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [011019 07:57]:
I was wondering if there are any secure methods of centrally
managing the versions of certain files on Debian machines. I currently
have a woody, two sids and several potatos which need to be kept up to
date. The security patches are not much
22 matches
Mail list logo
