Le mar 27/01/2004 à 13:34, Lupe Christoph a écrit :
> On Tuesday, 2004-01-27 at 12:19:41 +0100, Yannick Roehlly wrote:
>
> > The false LKM positives seem to result from a bug in chkrootkit which is
> > not aware of the new threading model of 2.6 kernel.
>
> > See bug #222179.
>
> Not exactly tru
On Tuesday, 2004-01-27 at 12:19:41 +0100, Yannick Roehlly wrote:
> The false LKM positives seem to result from a bug in chkrootkit which is
> not aware of the new threading model of 2.6 kernel.
> See bug #222179.
Not exactly true. This is also in recent 2.4.x kernels. See my other
mail. I'm runn
thanks..
Em Ter, 2004-01-27 às 09:19, Yannick Roehlly escreveu:
> Hi!
>
> The false LKM positives seem to result from a bug in chkrootkit which is
> not aware of the new threading model of 2.6 kernel.
>
> See bug #222179.
>
> Yannick
>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a s
Hi!
The false LKM positives seem to result from a bug in chkrootkit which is
not aware of the new threading model of 2.6 kernel.
See bug #222179.
Yannick
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Le mar 27/01/2004 à 13:34, Lupe Christoph a écrit :
> On Tuesday, 2004-01-27 at 12:19:41 +0100, Yannick Roehlly wrote:
>
> > The false LKM positives seem to result from a bug in chkrootkit which is
> > not aware of the new threading model of 2.6 kernel.
>
> > See bug #222179.
>
> Not exactly tru
thanks..
Em Ter, 2004-01-27 às 09:19, Yannick Roehlly escreveu:
> Hi!
>
> The false LKM positives seem to result from a bug in chkrootkit which is
> not aware of the new threading model of 2.6 kernel.
>
> See bug #222179.
>
> Yannick
>
On Tuesday, 2004-01-27 at 12:19:41 +0100, Yannick Roehlly wrote:
> The false LKM positives seem to result from a bug in chkrootkit which is
> not aware of the new threading model of 2.6 kernel.
> See bug #222179.
Not exactly true. This is also in recent 2.4.x kernels. See my other
mail. I'm runn
Hi!
The false LKM positives seem to result from a bug in chkrootkit which is
not aware of the new threading model of 2.6 kernel.
See bug #222179.
Yannick
8 matches
Mail list logo