In this case I use (and suggest to use) pscp which is a win32
implementation of scp (secure copy). It uses a ssh connection to upload
or download. Unfortunatly it uses no gui and has to run from cmd or
command.
pscp can be found on the putty page...
Greetz,
Ivo
eim wrote:
Two days ago I've lost all my Personal Data on my Second HDD,
Personal Data like Photos, Images, Audio Stuff, Source Code,
Mails: everything gone...!
I had some Backups fortuneatly but most stuff is lost forever.
Well, now I'm Ready to start my Personal Data Organization
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
CERT tells me Debian potato is vulnerable. We might want to correct them
if they are wong.
http://www.cert.org/incident_notes/IN-2001-12.html
http://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/945216
tells me:
Vender Status Date updated
Debian
On Fri, Nov 09, 2001 at 02:08:17AM +0100, Wichert Akkerman wrote:
Previously Ethan Benson wrote:
sorry i don't leave known security holes wide open on my boxes. only
an idiot does that.
If you think your box does not have currently unknown holes you are
naive :)
why don't you bother to
* NOKUBI Takatsugu [EMAIL PROTECTED] [011109 09:53]:
Vender Status Date updated
Debian Vulnerable 2-Nov-2001
OpenSSH on Debian is right, but ssh-nonfree is still vulnerable.
See http://bugs.debian.org/85725
It seems that some people think that even ssh in potato is unsafe. The
low
Sick
of static dropped calls?
Worried that you or your loved ones won't be able to summon help in a crisis?
The Amazing ezBooster is the solution!
Click Here - http://www.saverealbigdeals.com/cell
The Amazing ezBooster Can Save Your
Hey,
Is
there *anything* we can do about all this Spam that's getting on this
list?
Ed
-Original Message-From: HotDeals
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Friday, November 09, 2001 3:01
AMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: INSURE
GOOD RECEPTION! VITAL EMERGENCY STRATEGY!!!
Ethan Benson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[snip]
so here is the situation:
i don't leave open holes that script kiddies use with thier skripts only
a dumbass skript kiddie will be foiled by noexec /tmp skript kiddies will
be foiled by the fact that my boxes are always up to date and patched
On Fri, Nov 09, 2001 at 11:26:49AM +0100, Ville Uski wrote:
Is there any harm from installing ssh from woody on potato? This does
not apply in my case, but I'd like to know.
No harm beyond getting it built right (no binary installs from
woody/sid into potato), and realizing that
On Fri, Nov 09, 2001 at 01:49:54PM +, Tim Haynes wrote:
That's why, the more layers I can throw in someone's face, be it
firewalling, more than just `defaults' in fstab, running libsafe, the better.
sure useful things like nosuid, and nodev.
noexec is worthless.
as soon as everyone
On Fri, Nov 09, 2001 at 11:26:49AM +0100, Ville Uski wrote:
Is there any harm from installing ssh from woody on potato? This does
not apply in my case, but I'd like to know.
you can't, the dependencies will drag in half of woody.
you can backport the woody ssh packages to potato however.
At 09:05 09.11.01, you wrote:
In this case I use (and suggest to use) pscp which is a win32
implementation of scp (secure copy). It uses a ssh connection to upload
or download. Unfortunatly it uses no gui and has to run from cmd or
command.
Take a look at Secure-iXplorer
When I tried iXplorer, it didn't look to have ssh2 support. I'd prefer to use ssh2
support, WinSCP allows you to select, but it seems to crash when uploading lots
and/or big files. It DOES complete, but you can't see it's progress, etc.
...adam
On Fri, Nov 09, 2001 at 05:52:35PM +0100,
* Ethan Benson [EMAIL PROTECTED] [011109 16:41]:
Is there any harm from installing ssh from woody on potato? This
does
not apply in my case, but I'd like to know.
you can't, the dependencies will drag in half of woody.
I suspected that, and suggested to a friend of mine to upgrade to
At 18:00 09.11.01, you wrote:
When I tried iXplorer, it didn't look to have ssh2 support. I'd prefer to
use ssh2 support, WinSCP allows you to select, but it seems to crash when
uploading lots and/or big files. It DOES complete, but you can't see it's
progress, etc.
With iXplorer 0.17 you
Get Four Fun LEGO Games for One Fantastic Price!
FOR ALL 4 GAMES!
Includes FREE
Shipping Handling!
(Free Standard Shipping
Only)
Order Today While Supplies Last!
OR . .
.
Get Seven LEGO Games for Only $10.00 More!
High,
On Fri, 9 Nov 2001, Ed Street wrote:
Hey,
Is there *anything* we can do about all this Spam that's getting on this
list?
Wasn't there some rule that commercial mails posted to this list are
charged for a couple of thousends $$? Most spam is a commercial ad, so
there must be a lot
On Friday 09 November 2001 16:43 pm, Sebastiaan wrote:
High,
On Fri, 9 Nov 2001, Ed Street wrote:
Hey,
Is there *anything* we can do about all this Spam that's getting on
this
list?
Wasn't there some rule that commercial mails posted to this list are
charged for a couple of
Wouldn't it just be better if the lists accepted mail from members
only, and for those e-mail addresses that aren't subscribed, a couple
of list admins could approve them?
I don't think the fine for spam is being enforced, but I'm only
guessing.
Cya.
Bud Rogers wrote:
On Friday 09
On Friday 09 November 2001 17:46 pm, Robert Davidson wrote:
Wouldn't it just be better if the lists accepted mail from members
only,
I have always thought so, but whenever that suggestion comes up on any of
the debian lists it gets a pretty violent response.
--
Bud Rogers [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Adam Spickler wrote:
Is there a decent Windows FTP application that supports sftp? Unfortunately, I have
to use Windows at work. :/
PSFTP http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~sgtatham/putty/download.html
development snapshots only but still very useable.
(also a pscp for scp)
/James
--
Bud Rogers wrote:
On Friday 09 November 2001 17:46 pm, Robert Davidson wrote:
Wouldn't it just be better if the lists accepted mail from members
only,
I have always thought so, but whenever that suggestion comes up on any of
the debian lists it gets a pretty violent response.
yeah I
My procmail rules catched the initial spam but not
the bunch of usual and useless replies.
Alain
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hello,
I for one would be willing put put up with Spam of this nature as long as
the debian project collected the 'thousands' from the spamers.
Ed
-Original Message-
From: Bud Rogers [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Bud
Rogers
Sent: Friday, November 09, 2001 6:18 PM
To:
If so, you can find out the many ways with our wonderful
eBooks! Click here to learn more info
Remove yourself from this list by either:
Entering your email address below and clicking REMOVE:
Ethan == Ethan Benson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Ethan On Thu, Nov 08, 2001 at 03:32:06PM -0800, Vineet Kumar
Ethan wrote:
Well, on some level, *every* system is vulnerable to
scriptkiddies. The worst security flaw is admin hubris; always
remember that you are not immune.
On Friday 09 November 2001 17:46 pm, Robert Davidson wrote:
Wouldn't it just be better if the lists accepted mail from members
only,
I have always thought so, but whenever that suggestion comes up on any of
the debian lists it gets a pretty violent response.
yeah I know - I've
Earn continuous
residual income for the rest of your life!
Well help you do it!
Its easy to turn the internet into your own 24/7 business
and earn an executives salary!
Financial freedom is only a click away!
Remove
In this case I use (and suggest to use) pscp which is a win32
implementation of scp (secure copy). It uses a ssh connection to upload
or download. Unfortunatly it uses no gui and has to run from cmd or
command.
pscp can be found on the putty page...
Greetz,
Ivo
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
CERT tells me Debian potato is vulnerable. We might want to correct them
if they are wong.
http://www.cert.org/incident_notes/IN-2001-12.html
http://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/945216
tells me:
Vender Status Date updated
Debian
On Fri, Nov 09, 2001 at 02:08:17AM +0100, Wichert Akkerman wrote:
Previously Ethan Benson wrote:
sorry i don't leave known security holes wide open on my boxes. only
an idiot does that.
If you think your box does not have currently unknown holes you are
naive :)
why don't you bother to
* NOKUBI Takatsugu [EMAIL PROTECTED] [011109 09:53]:
Vender Status Date updated
Debian Vulnerable 2-Nov-2001
OpenSSH on Debian is right, but ssh-nonfree is still vulnerable.
See http://bugs.debian.org/85725
It seems that some people think that even ssh in potato is unsafe. The
low version
Sick
of static dropped calls?
Worried that you or your loved ones won't be able to summon help in a crisis?
The Amazing ezBooster is the solution!
Click Here - http://www.saverealbigdeals.com/cell
The Amazing ezBooster Can Save Your
Hey,
Is
there *anything* we can do about all this Spam that's getting on this
list?
Ed
-Original Message-From: HotDeals
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Friday, November 09, 2001 3:01
AMTo: debian-security@lists.debian.orgSubject: INSURE
GOOD RECEPTION! VITAL EMERGENCY
Ethan Benson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[snip]
so here is the situation:
i don't leave open holes that script kiddies use with thier skripts only
a dumbass skript kiddie will be foiled by noexec /tmp skript kiddies will
be foiled by the fact that my boxes are always up to date and patched
On Fri, Nov 09, 2001 at 11:26:49AM +0100, Ville Uski wrote:
Is there any harm from installing ssh from woody on potato? This does
not apply in my case, but I'd like to know.
No harm beyond getting it built right (no binary installs from
woody/sid into potato), and realizing that
On Fri, Nov 09, 2001 at 01:49:54PM +, Tim Haynes wrote:
That's why, the more layers I can throw in someone's face, be it
firewalling, more than just `defaults' in fstab, running libsafe, the better.
sure useful things like nosuid, and nodev.
noexec is worthless.
as soon as everyone
On Fri, Nov 09, 2001 at 11:26:49AM +0100, Ville Uski wrote:
Is there any harm from installing ssh from woody on potato? This does
not apply in my case, but I'd like to know.
you can't, the dependencies will drag in half of woody.
you can backport the woody ssh packages to potato however.
--
At 09:05 09.11.01, you wrote:
In this case I use (and suggest to use) pscp which is a win32
implementation of scp (secure copy). It uses a ssh connection to upload
or download. Unfortunatly it uses no gui and has to run from cmd or
command.
Take a look at Secure-iXplorer
When I tried iXplorer, it didn't look to have ssh2 support. I'd prefer to use
ssh2 support, WinSCP allows you to select, but it seems to crash when
uploading lots and/or big files. It DOES complete, but you can't see it's
progress, etc.
...adam
On Fri, Nov 09, 2001 at 05:52:35PM +0100,
* Ethan Benson [EMAIL PROTECTED] [011109 16:41]:
Is there any harm from installing ssh from woody on potato? This
does
not apply in my case, but I'd like to know.
you can't, the dependencies will drag in half of woody.
I suspected that, and suggested to a friend of mine to upgrade to
At 18:00 09.11.01, you wrote:
When I tried iXplorer, it didn't look to have ssh2 support. I'd prefer to
use ssh2 support, WinSCP allows you to select, but it seems to crash when
uploading lots and/or big files. It DOES complete, but you can't see it's
progress, etc.
With iXplorer 0.17 you can
Get Four Fun LEGO Games for One Fantastic Price!
FOR ALL 4 GAMES!
Includes FREE
Shipping Handling!
(Free Standard Shipping
Only)
Order Today While Supplies Last!
OR . .
.
Get Seven LEGO Games for Only $10.00 More!
High,
On Fri, 9 Nov 2001, Ed Street wrote:
Hey,
Is there *anything* we can do about all this Spam that's getting on this
list?
Wasn't there some rule that commercial mails posted to this list are
charged for a couple of thousends $$? Most spam is a commercial ad, so
there must be a lot of
On Friday 09 November 2001 16:43 pm, Sebastiaan wrote:
High,
On Fri, 9 Nov 2001, Ed Street wrote:
Hey,
Is there *anything* we can do about all this Spam that's getting on
this
list?
Wasn't there some rule that commercial mails posted to this list are
charged for a couple of
Wouldn't it just be better if the lists accepted mail from members
only, and for those e-mail addresses that aren't subscribed, a couple
of list admins could approve them?
I don't think the fine for spam is being enforced, but I'm only
guessing.
Cya.
Bud Rogers wrote:
On Friday 09 November
On Friday 09 November 2001 17:46 pm, Robert Davidson wrote:
Wouldn't it just be better if the lists accepted mail from members
only,
I have always thought so, but whenever that suggestion comes up on any of
the debian lists it gets a pretty violent response.
--
Bud Rogers [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Adam Spickler wrote:
Is there a decent Windows FTP application that supports sftp? Unfortunately, I
have to use Windows at work. :/
PSFTP http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~sgtatham/putty/download.html
development snapshots only but still very useable.
(also a pscp for scp)
/James
Bud Rogers wrote:
On Friday 09 November 2001 17:46 pm, Robert Davidson wrote:
Wouldn't it just be better if the lists accepted mail from members
only,
I have always thought so, but whenever that suggestion comes up on any of
the debian lists it gets a pretty violent response.
yeah I
My procmail rules catched the initial spam but not
the bunch of usual and useless replies.
Alain
Hello,
I for one would be willing put put up with Spam of this nature as long as
the debian project collected the 'thousands' from the spamers.
Ed
-Original Message-
From: Bud Rogers [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Bud
Rogers
Sent: Friday, November 09, 2001 6:18 PM
To:
If so, you can find out the many ways with our wonderful
eBooks! Click here to learn more info
Remove yourself from this list by either:
Entering your email address below and clicking REMOVE:
Ethan == Ethan Benson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Ethan On Thu, Nov 08, 2001 at 03:32:06PM -0800, Vineet Kumar
Ethan wrote:
Well, on some level, *every* system is vulnerable to
scriptkiddies. The worst security flaw is admin hubris; always
remember that you are not immune.
On Friday 09 November 2001 17:46 pm, Robert Davidson wrote:
Wouldn't it just be better if the lists accepted mail from members
only,
I have always thought so, but whenever that suggestion comes up on any of
the debian lists it gets a pretty violent response.
yeah I know - I've
Earn continuous
residual income for the rest of your life!
Well help you do it!
Its easy to turn the internet into your own 24/7 business
and earn an executives salary!
Financial freedom is only a click away!
Remove
55 matches
Mail list logo
