On Mon, Jun 10, 2002 at 09:31:09AM +0200, VERBEEK, Francois wrote:
I didn't intend to start an extensive discussion when replying to
Aurelien's question. Anyway, I'd just like to say to close the
debate that something that makes the web so strong is that anyone
can express himself in its
On Sun, 2002-06-09 at 04:57, Jean Christophe ANDRÃ wrote:
Hello *,
Probably a stupid question but... I can see lots of you on this list
frequently signing their e-mails, do you use some kind of GPG agent?
afaik gpg-agent is only just developping. Search gpg-devel list for it.
btw,
Previously Karl E. Jorgensen wrote:
Can anybody suggest a suitable forum/mailing list to ask for help on
this?
The security-audit list comes to mind. Google can tell you where to
find it :)
Wichert.
--
_
/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I think that you're a bit harsh, it is not necessary.
if anyone take a look at debian lists, one would see, that there are spanish,
french, and so on lists (even developers' lists as well).
every list has a netiquette/faq or anything. if the official language of
this list is not mentioned
On Thu, Jun 06, 2002 at 08:28:24PM +0200, Thomas Schmid wrote:
Hi,
So, I set up my server with aide and tiger to check it's integrity. The
reports are mailed to root which one is redirected to an other localadress
and to a second adresse on a other server. My question is now: is it
possible
On Fri, Jun 07, 2002 at 02:21:05PM +0200, D.J. Bolderman wrote:
Hello ppl,
What are some important things to watch on your debian box ? I'm checking
logfiles periodically, and run chkrootkit once in a while.
Are there any parameters in debian that can be turned on for some more
detailed
On Fri, Jun 07, 2002 at 11:03:11PM -0700, Luca Filipozzi wrote:
On Sat, Jun 08, 2002 at 12:51:00AM -0500, Jor-el wrote:
On Sat, 8 Jun 2002, Phillip Hofmeister wrote:
Just a guess...
but it probably has something to do with another package may
be utilizing that ID
I
Ryan J Goss wrote:
When I do a netstat -an, how do I properly decipher the output? To me it
looks like a lot of ports are listening, is there a way to determine what
daemon is running on those ports?
netstat -anp will tell you which processes.
lsof -i :port will tell you more specifically who
I've been playing around with a Woody installation, connecting to it via
SSH2,
with SecureCRT 3.4 for Win32. I think I've finally figured out what
encryption
types this Debian package (ssh 3.0.2p1-9) supports, but please correct
me if I'm
wrong -- http://www.openssh.org/features.html lists *only*
I use: netstat -vat | grep LISTEN
That will tell you everything that is really listening on your server.
You should be able to use lsof to find out what is actually listening
on those ports.
- James
-Original Message-
From: Ryan J Goss [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, June
Hi Jeff,
This one time, Jeff Bonner wrote:
I've been playing around with a Woody installation, connecting to it via
SSH2, with SecureCRT 3.4 for Win32. I think I've finally figured out what
encryption types this Debian package (ssh 3.0.2p1-9) supports, but please
correct me if I'm wrong --
Do netstat -anp as root instead, it gives process pid and name
-Original Message-
From: Ryan J Goss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon, 10 Jun 2002 12:04:03 -0500 (CDT)
Subject: netstat output
When I do a netstat -an, how do I properly decipher the output? To
me it
looks like a lot of ports
Quoting Anne Carasik ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
This one time, Jeff Bonner wrote:
3) Any reason you *wouldn't* want to use compression in SSH?
Yes, if you're going over a high speed line, no reason to use
compression. If you're connecting through a slow line (like a
modem), use compression.
I'm
On Mon, 10 Jun 2002, Robert van der Meulen wrote:
Quoting Anne Carasik ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
This one time, Jeff Bonner wrote:
3) Any reason you *wouldn't* want to use compression in SSH?
Yes, if you're going over a high speed line, no reason to use
compression. If you're connecting
Quoting Thomas Thurman ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
I can see how [speed of line] and [whether to use compression] are
related, and how [trustedness of line] and [whether to use encryption] are
related. But I don't see how anyone could say that If your data's going
over a high-speed line, there's no
Should have absolutely no problems connecting to sshd on Woody
or Sid from Windows using SecureCRT 3.4 or SecureFX 1.9 as I run 3.4.1
and 1.9.6 respectively from Windows 2000 with no problem on multiple
machines... I set the SSH Server to Auto Detect and left all Ciphers
and MAC options
On Mon 10 Jun 2002 13:23, Anne Carasik wrote:
This one time, Jeff Bonner wrote:
As in, This one time, at band camp...? ;) Also, sorry about
the wretched linebreaks, folks. Good ol Outlook.
Check the man page for what ciphers SSH2 accepts. I usually
leave it on Blowfish because it's
On Mon 10 Jun 2002 13:24, Mark Janssen wrote:
Run the ssh daemon with debugging on (2 levels or more) and check the
output:
sshd -d -d -d -p someport
ssh -v -p someport 127.0.0.1
Look at all the pretty output...
snipped
Yeah, after I wrote that message, I tried to connect with a
On Mon 10 Jun 2002 15:30, Jeremy T. Bouse wrote:
Should have absolutely no problems connecting to sshd on Woody
or Sid from Windows using SecureCRT 3.4 or SecureFX 1.9 as I run 3.4.1
and 1.9.6 respectively from Windows 2000 with no problem on multiple
machines... I set the SSH Server to
unsubscribe
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, Jun 10, 2002 at 01:13:06PM -0400, Jeff Bonner [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote...
3) Any reason you *wouldn't* want to use compression in SSH?
Besides the potential save on bandwidth, it depends on what you
transfer over the wire. If you are lucky, the space saving is so big
that you save more
This one time, Jeff Bonner wrote:
On Mon 10 Jun 2002 13:23, Anne Carasik wrote:
This one time, Jeff Bonner wrote:
As in, This one time, at band camp...? ;) Also, sorry about
the wretched linebreaks, folks. Good ol Outlook.
Yes, exactly. :) I got tired of the typical attribution line.
Someone explain this to me:
This guy is sitting back, waiting for suckers to visit his exploit-laden
website, correct?
grok.
On Tue, 2002-05-14 at 01:33, Kim chulmin wrote:
You're not going to believe what's happening to me now.
someone is doing an experiment on me.
I mean an experiment on
23 matches
Mail list logo
