In the non-unix world, telnet is still a necessity :(
Yes, I have putty on *my* windows boxen... But there are still
significant numbers of boxes that I use - MVS/VM (z/OS), W2k, etc.
that require me to allow directed telnet to my laptop/workstation.
Just because there is a H2 on the block,
Quoting Richard A Nelson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
Yes, I have putty on *my* windows boxen... But there are still
significant numbers of boxes that I use - MVS/VM (z/OS)...
OpenSSH works on MVS. See:
http://www.stdnet.com/uploads/media/MOVEit-DMZ-Compatible-Clients.PDF.
, W2k, etc.
Innumerable
also sprach Russell Coker [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004.09.24.1653 +0200]:
But what if the source is modified? Taking over a DD's machine
and modifying the source tree that is used to make the .diff.gz
shouldn't be impossible. We don't have any source auditing
processes that could deal with this.
On Fri, Sep 24, 2004 at 04:15:09PM -0600, s. keeling wrote:
Is anyone still using telnet when there's ssh? Why? I wouldn't even
use it inside my own firewalled LAN. ssh is just better.
I've been told telnet *does* make a lot of sense where IPSEC is set up.
Cheers,
--
Jan
Jan Minar wrote:
On Fri, Sep 24, 2004 at 04:15:09PM -0600, s. keeling wrote:
Is anyone still using telnet when there's ssh? Why? I wouldn't even
use it inside my own firewalled LAN. ssh is just better.
I've been told telnet *does* make a lot of sense where IPSEC is set up.
Cheers,
When IPSEC
On Sat, 25 Sep 2004, Rick Moen wrote:
Quoting Richard A Nelson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
Yes, I have putty on *my* windows boxen... But there are still
significant numbers of boxes that I use - MVS/VM (z/OS)...
OpenSSH works on MVS. See:
Quoting Richard A Nelson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
[Snip MVS mainframe priesthood standing in way of OpenSSH installation.]
I typically use cygwin on *MY* laptop, but when away from that -
I try not to install random software on other's boxen
The usual remedy is to pull down putty.exe (tiny) and
Hi,
I've started a few time ago (as many of you could know) the Debian
Hardened project , as an approach to Debian's mainline security.
Currently, the project is in a mature state of development with many
things already done and also a lot of testing of the work.
I've ported to Debian Sarge's
On Sat, Sep 25, 2004 at 10:34:43AM -0500, hanasaki wrote:
Jan Minar wrote:
On Fri, Sep 24, 2004 at 04:15:09PM -0600, s. keeling wrote:
Is anyone still using telnet when there's ssh? Why? I wouldn't even
use it inside my own firewalled LAN. ssh is just better.
I've been told telnet *does*
Hi,
On Sat, 25 Sep 2004, Rick Moen wrote:
Quoting Richard A Nelson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
The point remains that while telnet/ftp should be treated as deprecated
when feasible, sometimes there just aren't alternatives.
My entire document (http://linuxmafia.com/ssh) is devoted to
10 matches
Mail list logo