FYI:
weinholt one of the security.debian.org mirrors is out of date.
128.101.240.212 has a /debian-security/dists/etch/updates/Release
file dated 10 May 2007
madduck weinholt: please email [EMAIL PROTECTED] and
cc [EMAIL PROTECTED]
madduck also write a mail to debian-security@lists.debian.org
On Sun, May 13, 2007 at 01:33:16PM +0200, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
CVE-2007-1496
Michal Miroslaw reported a DoS vulnerability (crash) in netfilter.
A remote attacker can cause a NULL pointer dereference in the
nfnetlink_log function.
CVE says:
| nfnetlink_log in netfilter in
On Mon, May 14, 2007 at 10:04:46AM +0200, martin f krafft wrote:
FYI:
weinholt one of the security.debian.org mirrors is out of date.
128.101.240.212 has a /debian-security/dists/etch/updates/Release
file dated 10 May 2007
Is this related to the problems I'm having over here with
[CC to debian-admin and security@ removed]
On Mon, May 14, 2007 at 04:17:16PM +0300, Tomas Nykung wrote:
weinholt one of the security.debian.org mirrors is out of date.
128.101.240.212 has a /debian-security/dists/etch/updates/Release
file dated 10 May 2007
Is this related to the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Tomas Nykung wrote:
On Mon, May 14, 2007 at 10:04:46AM +0200, martin f krafft wrote:
FYI:
weinholt one of the security.debian.org mirrors is out of date.
128.101.240.212 has a /debian-security/dists/etch/updates/Release
file dated 10 May 2007
On Mon, May 14, 2007 at 08:15:11PM +0100, Philip Hands wrote:
Right, it seems that /org on saens was full.
I've removed saens from the debian-security.debian.org DNS round-robin, and
removed a few directories in the security to free up enough space to be
able to sync the main debian
On Tue, 2007-05-15 at 00:14 +0300, Tomas Nykung wrote:
What I don't understand is why I always got the bad mirror, regardless
how many times I tried to rerun aptitude/apt-get update both yesterday
and today (and on two computers while the first one I upgraded did get
the upgrade without any
Hi,
On Mon May 14, 2007 at 17:17:13 -0400, Jim Popovitch wrote:
On Tue, 2007-05-15 at 00:14 +0300, Tomas Nykung wrote:
What I don't understand is why I always got the bad mirror, regardless
how many times I tried to rerun aptitude/apt-get update both yesterday
and today (and on two
--On May 15, 2007 12:14:28 AM +0300 Tomas Nykung [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
PS
What I don't understand is why I always got the bad mirror, regardless
how many times I tried to rerun aptitude/apt-get update both yesterday
and today (and on two computers while the first one I upgraded did get
9 matches
Mail list logo