-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
hi!
lately i was running nmap to check my office machine. to my surprise i
found an open port 'cadsi-lm' (1387). running nmap again the port was not
there anymore. on future runs i found my machine listening on different
registered non-privileged
On Tue, May 29, 2001 at 12:07:47PM +0100, Tim Haynes wrote:
sudo netstat -plan | grep LIST
just a small note: if your LC enviroment variables are set to other language, you may
need to change LIST for other word. (in pt_BR is OUÇA)
--
Pedro Zorzenon Neto
Tim Haynes writes:
sigh Why do people persist in using nmap at test phase? Sure, if you've
been cracked, scan yourself if you want, but if you're looking to see `what
do I have open?' then nmap is the *last* tool I'd use.
Go back to
sudo netstat -plan | grep LIST
Well...that
On Tue, May 29, 2001 at 10:50:07AM +0200, kjfsgjks ksjgkfhfd wrote:
Hi,
kjfsgjks: You probably have a real name. Why not use it?
I have a question which has been bothering me all along, with windows /
linux / *bsd / etc. In this case, it's about Debian so I thought I'd post my
question
Cesar writes:
Hi !
I'm a disquette with this utilities clean.
#mount /dev/fd0 /floppy
#cd /floppy
#./netstat -antp
Don't forget to mount -ro or write protect the floppy. :-)
On linux, AFASIK, netstat relies on /dev/net and friends not to lie to it.
This is a poor
actually I thought some sort of log for dpkg/apt would be good, just to
keep a record of when something was installed or upgraded. so you know
what changed.
On Tue, May 29, 2001 at 09:36:37AM -0500, Matthew H. Ray wrote:
I've got tripwire keeping an eye on my filesystems so I'm notified
SAWFASP^*
as laws around the globe are forged to weak personal privacy,
police knocking on one's door, because of portscanning a
previously hacked website, and - i don't have to tell those
of you, which are reading slashdot - as pretty strange things start
to happend worldwide, i'm getting
I like this. Would it be difficult to modify Debian, so that
upon install, it creates an encrypted root volume and starts
things off the right way?
-Original Message-
From: clemens [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tuesday, May 29, 2001 6:04 PM
Subject: root
there is already a HowTo on how to create an encrypted
loop-back file system. it doesn't encrypt the whole
disk, but it could certainly hold anything worth having
encrypted.
don't get me wrong, i fully understand the reasons behind
putting the entire system behind a good pass-phrase. with
the
I see it as more than this. I see it as ensuring that the data on the disk does
not get accessed by anyone never intended to see it. (physically, of course).
I guess this would mostly be cool for thwarting things like police raids,
servers vulnerable in remote locations (e.g. colocation, etc). My
how, can i see the tcp port 4350 that states to be opened useing nmap
There is _the_ official document of registered ports at
http://www.iana.org/assignments/port-numbers and it claims 4350 is
Net Device - what ever that means. The entry is created by microsoft
so we may assume it is some
Hi,
I have a question which has been bothering me all along, with windows /
linux / *bsd / etc. In this case, it's about Debian so I thought I'd post my
question here.
Right now I have a linux-box (Debian 2.2r2) doing my
masquerading/firewalling. It has a dynamic ip (and changes quite often,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
hi!
lately i was running nmap to check my office machine. to my surprise i
found an open port 'cadsi-lm' (1387). running nmap again the port was not
there anymore. on future runs i found my machine listening on different
registered non-privileged
Jogi Hofmueller [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
lately i was running nmap to check my office machine. to my surprise i
found an open port 'cadsi-lm' (1387). running nmap again the port was not
there anymore. on future runs i found my machine listening on different
registered non-privileged ports
Tim Haynes writes:
sigh Why do people persist in using nmap at test phase? Sure, if you've
been cracked, scan yourself if you want, but if you're looking to see `what
do I have open?' then nmap is the *last* tool I'd use.
Go back to
sudo netstat -plan | grep LIST
Well...that would
I've got tripwire keeping an eye on my filesystems so I'm notified whenever a
change is made. I recently added a couple of packages via apt, and I noticed a
number of files were modified that I hadn't expected changed. I don't recall
the names of the packages I upgraded (there were a bunch), but
Hi !
I'm a disquette with this utilities clean.
#mount /dev/fd0 /floppy
#cd /floppy
#./netstat -antp
Regards
César.
Ken Seefried wrote:
Tim Haynes writes:
sigh Why do people persist in using nmap at test phase? Sure, if you've
been cracked, scan yourself if you want, but
On Tue, 29 May 2001, Ken Seefried wrote:
Tim Haynes writes:
sigh Why do people persist in using nmap at test phase? Sure, if you've
been cracked, scan yourself if you want, but if you're looking to see `what
do I have open?' then nmap is the *last* tool I'd use.
Go back to
Sorry I have :))
Cesar wrote:
Hi !
I have a disquette with this utilities clean.
#mount /dev/fd0 /floppy
#cd /floppy
#./netstat -antp
Regards
César.
On Tue, May 29, 2001 at 10:50:07AM +0200, kjfsgjks ksjgkfhfd wrote:
Hi,
kjfsgjks: You probably have a real name. Why not use it?
I have a question which has been bothering me all along, with windows /
linux / *bsd / etc. In this case, it's about Debian so I thought I'd post my
question
Cesar writes:
Hi !
I'm a disquette with this utilities clean.
#mount /dev/fd0 /floppy
#cd /floppy
#./netstat -antp
Don't forget to mount -ro or write protect the floppy. :-)
On linux, AFASIK, netstat relies on /dev/net and friends not to lie to it.
This is a poor assumption
actually I thought some sort of log for dpkg/apt would be good, just to
keep a record of when something was installed or upgraded. so you know
what changed.
On Tue, May 29, 2001 at 09:36:37AM -0500, Matthew H. Ray wrote:
I've got tripwire keeping an eye on my filesystems so I'm notified whenever
I like this. Would it be difficult to modify Debian, so that
upon install, it creates an encrypted root volume and starts
things off the right way?
-Original Message-
From: clemens [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: debian-security@lists.debian.org debian-security@lists.debian.org
Date: Tuesday, May
there is already a HowTo on how to create an encrypted
loop-back file system. it doesn't encrypt the whole
disk, but it could certainly hold anything worth having
encrypted.
don't get me wrong, i fully understand the reasons behind
putting the entire system behind a good pass-phrase. with
the
24 matches
Mail list logo
