> > It looks like it is fixed in glibc 2.2.5-8, but again, it never made
> > into official announcement.
>
> On woody, I believe Ben have been already working, but I don't know
> its status. Ben? Should I go ahead for woody?
Woody and potato are already uploaded to security.d.o. It's in their
ha
At Mon, 12 Aug 2002 11:59:46 +0300,
Dmitry Borodaenko wrote:
> Recently several glibc vulnerabilities have been published, and there is
> only some disjoint information about their status for Debian here and
> there. Maybe this bunch of issues is worth one combined DSA that will
> explain what is f
Forwarded by suneo135
Forwarded Message -
Package:openssl
Version:0.9.6c-2
Severity:critical
Openssl 0.9.6f changes
Changes between 0.9.6e and 0.9.6f [8 Aug 2002]
*) Fix ASN1 checks. Check for overflow by comparing with LONG_MAX
and get fix the header length calculati
On Mon, 12 Aug 2002 at 08:00:16PM -0500, Daniel J. Rychlik wrote:
> santizer. Do you guys have any suggestions or even a preference over
> one or the other?
Sophos is considered by many in the security industry to be one of the best.
BUT, it is commercial (in other words...green). It supports M
I like amavis-perl, but have never set it up under exim.
--
Arthur H. Johnson II, Debian GNU/Linux Advocate
Catechist, St John Catholic Church, Davison MI USA
President, Genesee County Linux Users Group
IRC: [EMAIL PROTECTED],#debian
YIM: arthurjohnson
AIM: bytor4232
ICQ: 31770438
On Mon,
Hello,
I perfer the scanning and rejection to be at SMTP sending time so I think
exiscan [1] is a better tool. You can also add-in spamassassin checking at the
same time and there is a patch to reject or just tag based the spamassassin
responce with a patch from [EMAIL PROTECTED] posted to the exi
hi ya
here's the collection of virus scanners..
http://www.Linux-Sec.net/Mail/antivirus.gwif.html
c ya
alvin
On Mon, 12 Aug 2002, Daniel J. Rychlik wrote:
>
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Gentlemen,
>
> I am wanting to setup a good virus scanner for exim. I tried o
i recently setup mailscanner with mcafee virusscan and have been pretty
happy with it.
if you describe the nature of the error, i might be able to help you
out.
xn
On Mon, Aug 12, 2002 at 08:00:16PM -0500, Daniel J. Rychlik wrote:
>
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Gentlem
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Gentlemen,
I am wanting to setup a good virus scanner for exim. I tried out
mailscanner, but it bombs with an error. I tried to fix the error,
but I got frustrated. I would like to use mailscanner or even the
santizer. Do you guys have any sugge
On Sun, 2002-08-11 at 23:23, Andres Salomon wrote:
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=155529&repeatmerged=yes
Thank you!
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Recently several glibc vulnerabilities have been published, and there is
only some disjoint information about their status for Debian here and
there. Maybe this bunch of issues is worth one combined DSA that will
explain what is fixed?
http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CAN-2002-0391
11 matches
Mail list logo
