Hi,
ich werd wohl heute mit dem Fahrad hochfahren. Kannst du mir bitte das
ladegeraete fuers Handy mit auf den Berg bringen?
mfg
Andy
--
---
Optel Informatik GmbH
Rathausallee 10
53757 St. Augustin
Germany
Tel.: +49 2241 9211020
Fax : +49 2241 921
On Mon, Jul 28, 2003 at 11:38:51AM -0700, Bruce Banner wrote:
> When were they patched? And how do I know when they
> are patched and when they are available? Is there
> somewhere I can find this info?
You could subscribe to debian-changes@lists.debian.org
See http://lists.debian.org/debian-chang
On Mon, Jul 28, 2003 at 11:38:51AM -0700, Bruce Banner wrote:
> When were they patched? And how do I know when they
> are patched and when they are available? Is there
> somewhere I can find this info?
You could subscribe to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
See http://lists.debian.org/debian-changes/
Marcin
PS
On Tue, Jun 03, 2003 at 10:01:33AM -0700, Mark Ferlatte wrote:
> Phillip Hofmeister said on Tue, Jun 03, 2003 at 10:02:09AM -0400:
> > However, for the most part, chrooting is a valid countermeasure/method
> > to compartmentalize. It is a shame that no distribution comes with
> > packages natively
Thanks for the info. I don't like depending on Red
Hat for security fixes. I want to rely on Debian for
this kind of stuff I just didn't know where to find
it.
Thanks
--- Ulrich Scholler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Hi Bruce,
>
> On Mon Jul 28, 2003 at 11:38:51 -0700, Bruce Banner
> wrote:
> >
Hi Bruce,
On Mon Jul 28, 2003 at 11:38:51 -0700, Bruce Banner wrote:
> When were they patched? And how do I know when they
> are patched and when they are available? Is there
> somewhere I can find this info? I found the Red Hat
> info on Bugtraq but there was no mention of Debian
> Source anywh
When were they patched? And how do I know when they
are patched and when they are available? Is there
somewhere I can find this info? I found the Red Hat
info on Bugtraq but there was no mention of Debian
Source anywhere.
Thanks
--- Matthijs Mohlmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Why download t
On Tue, Jun 03, 2003 at 10:01:33AM -0700, Mark Ferlatte wrote:
> Phillip Hofmeister said on Tue, Jun 03, 2003 at 10:02:09AM -0400:
> > However, for the most part, chrooting is a valid countermeasure/method
> > to compartmentalize. It is a shame that no distribution comes with
> > packages natively
On Tue, Jun 03, 2003 at 10:02:09AM -0400, Phillip Hofmeister wrote:
> On Mon, 02 Jun 2003 at 03:38:21PM -0500, Adam Majer wrote:
> > With something like sendmail or apache, it only needs to see a very
> > limited part of the file system, so even braking these will not do
> > any real damage.
>
> D
Thanks for the info. I don't like depending on Red
Hat for security fixes. I want to rely on Debian for
this kind of stuff I just didn't know where to find
it.
Thanks
--- Ulrich Scholler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Hi Bruce,
>
> On Mon Jul 28, 2003 at 11:38:51 -0700, Bruce Banner
> wrote:
> >
Hi Bruce,
On Mon Jul 28, 2003 at 11:38:51 -0700, Bruce Banner wrote:
> When were they patched? And how do I know when they
> are patched and when they are available? Is there
> somewhere I can find this info? I found the Red Hat
> info on Bugtraq but there was no mention of Debian
> Source anywh
Why download the source from RedHat? The source from debian is also
patched with needed patches.
apt-get install kernel-source
On Mon, 2003-07-28 at 19:05, Bruce Banner wrote:
> You can download Red Hats
> kernel-source-2.4.20-19.9.i386.rpm run alien against
> it and install the dpkg'ed kernel-
You can download Red Hats
kernel-source-2.4.20-19.9.i386.rpm run alien against
it and install the dpkg'ed kernel-source.deb. I have
been forced to do this in the past to get patches that
havn't been released or in the main stream kernel from
kernel.org yet.
Peace
--- Phillip Hofmeister <[EMAIL
When were they patched? And how do I know when they
are patched and when they are available? Is there
somewhere I can find this info? I found the Red Hat
info on Bugtraq but there was no mention of Debian
Source anywhere.
Thanks
--- Matthijs Mohlmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Why download t
Herbert Xu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>> CAN-2003-0552: Jerry Kreuscher discovered that the Forwarding table
>>> could be spoofed by sending forged packets with bogus source
>>> addresses the same as the local host.
>>
>> Ah, this one. I don't even know if it's about IP.
>>
>> As usual, Red H
On Mon, Jul 28, 2003 at 09:18:31AM -0500, Andr?s Rold?n wrote:
>Hi all.
>
>I have a Debian Woody up-to-date'd production server (it's daily updated) and
>I need a report of the security updates made in the server since a given time
>ago
>(a month, a couple of months or so).
>
>Is there any way, a
On Tue, Jun 03, 2003 at 10:02:09AM -0400, Phillip Hofmeister wrote:
> On Mon, 02 Jun 2003 at 03:38:21PM -0500, Adam Majer wrote:
> > With something like sendmail or apache, it only needs to see a very
> > limited part of the file system, so even braking these will not do
> > any real damage.
>
> D
Why download the source from RedHat? The source from debian is also
patched with needed patches.
apt-get install kernel-source
On Mon, 2003-07-28 at 19:05, Bruce Banner wrote:
> You can download Red Hats
> kernel-source-2.4.20-19.9.i386.rpm run alien against
> it and install the dpkg'ed kernel-
You can download Red Hats
kernel-source-2.4.20-19.9.i386.rpm run alien against
it and install the dpkg'ed kernel-source.deb. I have
been forced to do this in the past to get patches that
havn't been released or in the main stream kernel from
kernel.org yet.
Peace
--- Phillip Hofmeister <[EMAIL
Beware there is also a vulnerability in the spanning
tree implementation as well so.
Peace
--- Phillip Hofmeister <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If I do use bridging...is there a patch?
>
> What is the consequences of an unpatched system? (In
> more detail than
> below)
>
> On Mon, 28 Jul 2003 a
Herbert Xu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>> CAN-2003-0552: Jerry Kreuscher discovered that the Forwarding table
>>> could be spoofed by sending forged packets with bogus source
>>> addresses the same as the local host.
>>
>> Ah, this one. I don't even know if it's about IP.
>>
>> As usual, Red H
On Mon, Jul 28, 2003 at 09:18:31AM -0500, Andr?s Rold?n wrote:
>Hi all.
>
>I have a Debian Woody up-to-date'd production server (it's daily updated) and
>I need a report of the security updates made in the server since a given time ago
>(a month, a couple of months or so).
>
>Is there any way, a t
Hi all.
I have a Debian Woody up-to-date'd production server (it's daily updated) and
I need a report of the security updates made in the server since a given time
ago
(a month, a couple of months or so).
Is there any way, a tool or something to do that?
Thanks in advance.
--
Andres Roldan
If I do use bridging...is there a patch?
What is the consequences of an unpatched system? (In more detail than
below)
On Mon, 28 Jul 2003 at 07:39:53PM +1000, Herbert Xu wrote:
> Florian Weimer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Bruce Banner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> >> CAN-2003-0552: Jerry
Beware there is also a vulnerability in the spanning
tree implementation as well so.
Peace
--- Phillip Hofmeister <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If I do use bridging...is there a patch?
>
> What is the consequences of an unpatched system? (In
> more detail than
> below)
>
> On Mon, 28 Jul 2003 a
Hi all.
I have a Debian Woody up-to-date'd production server (it's daily updated) and
I need a report of the security updates made in the server since a given time ago
(a month, a couple of months or so).
Is there any way, a tool or something to do that?
Thanks in advance.
--
Andres Roldan <
If I do use bridging...is there a patch?
What is the consequences of an unpatched system? (In more detail than
below)
On Mon, 28 Jul 2003 at 07:39:53PM +1000, Herbert Xu wrote:
> Florian Weimer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Bruce Banner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> >> CAN-2003-0552: Jerry
Thanks,
--- Herbert Xu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Florian Weimer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Bruce Banner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> >> CAN-2003-0552: Jerry Kreuscher discovered that
> the Forwarding table
> >> could be spoofed by sending forged packets with
> bogus source
> >> addre
Florian Weimer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Bruce Banner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> CAN-2003-0552: Jerry Kreuscher discovered that the Forwarding table
>> could be spoofed by sending forged packets with bogus source
>> addresses the same as the local host.
>
> Ah, this one. I don't even kn
Thanks,
--- Herbert Xu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Florian Weimer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Bruce Banner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> >> CAN-2003-0552: Jerry Kreuscher discovered that
> the Forwarding table
> >> could be spoofed by sending forged packets with
> bogus source
> >> addre
Florian Weimer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Bruce Banner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> CAN-2003-0552: Jerry Kreuscher discovered that the Forwarding table
>> could be spoofed by sending forged packets with bogus source
>> addresses the same as the local host.
>
> Ah, this one. I don't even kn
31 matches
Mail list logo
