* s. keeling [Mon, 22 Dec 2003 23:52:30 -0700]:
With help from one of the list recipients, this is now verified and
reproducible. Something between me and those people whose keys are
determined by my copy of gpg to be Bad signature, is mangling mail.
Specifically, that something is fixing
I've been noticing loads of mails like this lately:
Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2003 16:25:34 +0500
From: Joseph Jenkins [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: MIT, rest in peace!
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Mailer: mPOP Web-Mail 2.19
emery atrocious larval drippy elate incontrollable raster anglicanism
On Tue, Dec 23, 2003 at 01:25:30PM +, Dale Amon wrote:
I've been noticing loads of mails like this lately:
Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2003 16:25:34 +0500
From: Joseph Jenkins [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: MIT, rest in peace!
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Mailer: mPOP Web-Mail 2.19
This discussion has some minor relevance to debian-isp, but nothing to do with
debian-security. Let's move the discussion to debian-isp.
On Wed, 24 Dec 2003 00:25, Dale Amon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've been noticing loads of mails like this lately:
emery atrocious larval drippy elate
Dale Amon [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I can only assume someone out there is trying to attack
bayesian systems by loading them up with all sorts of
normal words so that good mail gets false positives, thus
breaking the systems.
I have yet to see a false positive caused by this even though I get
Incoming from Adeodato Sim?:
* s. keeling [Mon, 22 Dec 2003 23:52:30 -0700]:
With help from one of the list recipients, this is now verified and
reproducible. Something between me and those people whose keys are
determined by my copy of gpg to be Bad signature, is mangling mail.
On Tue, Dec 23, 2003 at 01:36:20PM +, Dale Amon wrote:
I have yet to see a false positive caused by this even though I get
quite a lot of this stuff and routinely mark it as spam.
I can't think of any other reason for someone to do it
though. There has to be a point. Someone is going
One technique that's being used a lot is to get books in electronic form
and
put a coupld of sentences in every spam (sentences from a book will pass
gramatical checking etc, unlike the example you posted above). Also
text
from a book will have the right ratio of words, you will almost never
Hi,
Last time I frequently get messages like
smbd[949]: refused connect from in my /var/log/syslog. Every time
with new IP-address. What are these connections? Is somebody trying to
scan me or what is the reason for these messages?
Thank you in advance!
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL
On Tue, Dec 23, 2003 at 07:01:01PM +0100, outsider wrote:
Last time I frequently get messages like
smbd[949]: refused connect from in my /var/log/syslog. Every time
with new IP-address. What are these connections? Is somebody trying to
scan me or what is the reason for these messages?
You
Noah L. Meyerhans wrote:
This method is especially effective in the case where the bayesian
classifier only looks at the first MIME attachment, because the second
is then free to contain whatever spam tokens they want to put in it.
IIRC, this is how most bayesian filters behave.
noah
I got such
On Tue, Dec 23, 2003 at 01:25:30PM +, Dale Amon wrote:
I've been noticing loads of mails like this lately:
Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2003 16:25:34 +0500
From: Joseph Jenkins [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: MIT, rest in peace!
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Mailer: mPOP Web-Mail 2.19
You may wish to enable an iptables filter to block all ports except
those you explicitly allow.
On Tue, 23 Dec 2003 at 01:01:01PM -0500, outsider wrote:
Hi,
Last time I frequently get messages like
smbd[949]: refused connect from in my /var/log/syslog. Every time
with new IP-address. What
Hi all,
My first post here - long time d-u subscriber. I'm trying to set up a
VPN where WinXP roadwarriors can access a LAN that sits behind a Linux
router. I want to use X.509 certificates rather than PSKs.
So I've installed freeswan and l2tpd on the router. There is quite a
bit of
On Tue, 23 Dec 2003 13:25:30 +, Dale Amon wrote:
I've been noticing loads of mails like this lately:
Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2003 16:25:34 +0500
From: Joseph Jenkins [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: MIT, rest in peace!
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Mailer: mPOP Web-Mail 2.19
emery atrocious
Incoming from s. keeling:
Incoming from Thomas Sj?gren:
On Mon, Dec 22, 2003 at 12:35:49PM -0700, s. keeling wrote:
gpg: Signature made Sun Dec 21 17:50:12 2003 MST using DSA key ID
946886AE
gpg: BAD signature from Trey Sizemore [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Now, from the same guy, same
* s. keeling [Mon, 22 Dec 2003 23:52:30 -0700]:
With help from one of the list recipients, this is now verified and
reproducible. Something between me and those people whose keys are
determined by my copy of gpg to be Bad signature, is mangling mail.
Specifically, that something is fixing
I've been noticing loads of mails like this lately:
Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2003 16:25:34 +0500
From: Joseph Jenkins [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: MIT, rest in peace!
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Mailer: mPOP Web-Mail 2.19
emery atrocious larval drippy elate incontrollable raster anglicanism
On Tue, Dec 23, 2003 at 01:32:23PM +, Kalle Kivimaa wrote:
I have yet to see a false positive caused by this even though I get
quite a lot of this stuff and routinely mark it as spam.
I can't think of any other reason for someone to do it
though. There has to be a point. Someone is going to
On Tue, Dec 23, 2003 at 01:25:30PM +, Dale Amon wrote:
I've been noticing loads of mails like this lately:
Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2003 16:25:34 +0500
From: Joseph Jenkins [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: MIT, rest in peace!
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Mailer: mPOP Web-Mail 2.19
This discussion has some minor relevance to debian-isp, but nothing to do with
debian-security. Let's move the discussion to debian-isp.
On Wed, 24 Dec 2003 00:25, Dale Amon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've been noticing loads of mails like this lately:
emery atrocious larval drippy elate
Dale Amon [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I can only assume someone out there is trying to attack
bayesian systems by loading them up with all sorts of
normal words so that good mail gets false positives, thus
breaking the systems.
I have yet to see a false positive caused by this even though I get
Incoming from Adeodato Sim?:
* s. keeling [Mon, 22 Dec 2003 23:52:30 -0700]:
With help from one of the list recipients, this is now verified and
reproducible. Something between me and those people whose keys are
determined by my copy of gpg to be Bad signature, is mangling mail.
One technique that's being used a lot is to get books in electronic form
and
put a coupld of sentences in every spam (sentences from a book will pass
gramatical checking etc, unlike the example you posted above). Also
text
from a book will have the right ratio of words, you will almost never
On Tue, Dec 23, 2003 at 01:36:20PM +, Dale Amon wrote:
I have yet to see a false positive caused by this even though I get
quite a lot of this stuff and routinely mark it as spam.
I can't think of any other reason for someone to do it
though. There has to be a point. Someone is going
Hi,
Last time I frequently get messages like
smbd[949]: refused connect from in my /var/log/syslog. Every time
with new IP-address. What are these connections? Is somebody trying to
scan me or what is the reason for these messages?
Thank you in advance!
On Tue, Dec 23, 2003 at 07:01:01PM +0100, outsider wrote:
Last time I frequently get messages like
smbd[949]: refused connect from in my /var/log/syslog. Every time
with new IP-address. What are these connections? Is somebody trying to
scan me or what is the reason for these messages?
You
Noah L. Meyerhans wrote:
This method is especially effective in the case where the bayesian
classifier only looks at the first MIME attachment, because the second
is then free to contain whatever spam tokens they want to put in it.
IIRC, this is how most bayesian filters behave.
noah
I got
You may wish to enable an iptables filter to block all ports except
those you explicitly allow.
On Tue, 23 Dec 2003 at 01:01:01PM -0500, outsider wrote:
Hi,
Last time I frequently get messages like
smbd[949]: refused connect from in my /var/log/syslog. Every time
with new IP-address. What
On Tue, Dec 23, 2003 at 01:25:30PM +, Dale Amon wrote:
I've been noticing loads of mails like this lately:
Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2003 16:25:34 +0500
From: Joseph Jenkins [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: MIT, rest in peace!
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Mailer: mPOP Web-Mail 2.19
Hi all,
My first post here - long time d-u subscriber. I'm trying to set up a
VPN where WinXP roadwarriors can access a LAN that sits behind a Linux
router. I want to use X.509 certificates rather than PSKs.
So I've installed freeswan and l2tpd on the router. There is quite a
bit of
On Tue, 23 Dec 2003 13:25:30 +, Dale Amon wrote:
I've been noticing loads of mails like this lately:
Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2003 16:25:34 +0500
From: Joseph Jenkins [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: MIT, rest in peace!
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Mailer: mPOP Web-Mail 2.19
emery atrocious
32 matches
Mail list logo
