BADSIG verifying s.d.o Release file

2006-06-30 Thread martin f krafft
I've been seeing this a bunch in the past few weeks. Just making sure you know about it, and maybe someone knows what's going on: W: GPG error: http://security.debian.org stable/updates Release: The following signatures were invalid: BADSIG 010908312D230C5F Debian Archive Automatic Signing Key

Re: BADSIG verifying s.d.o Release file

2006-06-30 Thread Kurt Neuenfeldt
On Fri, 30 Jun 2006 09:15:42 +0200 martin f krafft [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: hi, I've been seeing this a bunch in the past few weeks. Just making sure you know about it, and maybe someone knows what's going on: W: GPG error: http://security.debian.org stable/updates Release: The following

Re: BADSIG verifying s.d.o Release file

2006-06-30 Thread Steve Kemp
On Fri, Jun 30, 2006 at 09:15:42AM +0200, martin f krafft wrote: I've been seeing this a bunch in the past few weeks. Just making sure you know about it, and maybe someone knows what's going on: W: GPG error: http://security.debian.org stable/updates Release: The following signatures were

Re: BADSIG verifying s.d.o Release file

2006-06-30 Thread martin f krafft
also sprach Steve Kemp [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006.06.30.1004 +0200]: This is a known issue, relating to some of the infrastructure changes. Hopefully it will be resolved shortly. Thanks Steve. Do you know why this was not publicised beforehand on debian-security-announce or debian-announce?

Re: BADSIG verifying s.d.o Release file

2006-06-30 Thread Steve Kemp
On Fri, Jun 30, 2006 at 10:33:55AM +0200, martin f krafft wrote: also sprach Steve Kemp [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006.06.30.1004 +0200]: This is a known issue, relating to some of the infrastructure changes. Hopefully it will be resolved shortly. Thanks Steve. Do you know why this was not

Re: BADSIG verifying s.d.o Release file

2006-06-30 Thread martin f krafft
also sprach Steve Kemp [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006.06.30.1043 +0200]: I think nobody thought of it to be honest, and people started to notice just around the time we did. (The problem here comes from the new dak software being used to handle the archive, and this is just a problem that

Re: BADSIG verifying s.d.o Release file

2006-06-30 Thread Martin Schulze
martin f krafft wrote: I've been seeing this a bunch in the past few weeks. Just making sure you know about it, and maybe someone knows what's going on: W: GPG error: http://security.debian.org stable/updates Release: The following signatures were invalid: BADSIG 010908312D230C5F Debian

Re: BADSIG verifying s.d.o Release file

2006-06-30 Thread martin f krafft
also sprach Martin Schulze [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006.06.30.1450 +0200]: W: GPG error: http://security.debian.org stable/updates Release: The following signatures were invalid: BADSIG 010908312D230C5F Debian Archive Automatic Signing Key (2006) [EMAIL PROTECTED] Could the reason be that the