Re: [VUA 51-1] Updated clamav version

2008-12-10 Thread Jim Popovitch
On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 00:55, Andreas Barth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > --- > Debian Volatile Update Announcement VUA 51-1 http://volatile.debian.org > [EMAIL PROTECTED] Stephen Gran > Dec 11

Re: [SECURITY] [DSA 1680-1] New clamav packages fix potential codeexecution

2008-12-10 Thread Marcin Owsiany
On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 03:26:46PM -0500, Jim Popovitch wrote: > On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 15:10, Michael Tautschnig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I guess only the volatile archive maintainers can help out. > > Yet they have been silent for several days now on this issue. FTR there's been no respo

Re: [SECURITY] [DSA 1680-1] New clamav packages fix potential codeexecution

2008-12-10 Thread Jim Popovitch
On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 15:10, Michael Tautschnig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I guess only the volatile archive maintainers can help out. Yet they have been silent for several days now on this issue. Are they overloaded? Do we need new volatile maintainers? Who's in the know here? -Jim P.

Re: [SECURITY] [DSA 1680-1] New clamav packages fix potential codeexecution

2008-12-10 Thread Michael Tautschnig
> On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 13:21, Dominic Hargreaves <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I don't really understand your question. There is no separate security > > archive for volatile, as I understand it. > > Oddly enough I understood Tony, yet I don't understand the > Volative+ClamAV situation. Can s

Re: Freeze SO Linux, it's possible?

2008-12-10 Thread Izak Burger
On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 7:40 PM, Sjors Gielen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > He doesn't mean a suspend to disk, which is what I thought too, first. > He wants to make his installation "frozen", i.e., changes aren't saved > over reboots. I don't know how to do it, but maybe this clears up his > origin

Re: [SECURITY] [DSA 1680-1] New clamav packages fix potential codeexecution

2008-12-10 Thread Jim Popovitch
On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 13:21, Dominic Hargreaves <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I don't really understand your question. There is no separate security > archive for volatile, as I understand it. Oddly enough I understood Tony, yet I don't understand the Volative+ClamAV situation. Can someone defin

Re: Freeze SO Linux, it's possible?

2008-12-10 Thread James Kosin
Carlos Carrero Gutierrez wrote: > Hi, i would like to freeze my linux in order to freeze the OS, then, > when I reboot the computer all changes that i made in the computer > dissapears and it returns to the previous OS freezed. > > In windows there is something similar, called "Deep Freeze" (it's

Re: [SECURITY] [DSA 1680-1] New clamav packages fix potentialcode execution

2008-12-10 Thread Tony Nederpel
*** posted this one again to get the mail under the correct subject again *** > Have you security support activated for your apt? > Add the line > deb http://security.debian.org/ stable/updates mainto your > /etc/apt/sources.list (as described in the security announcement). That line is in the

Re: [SECURITY] [DSA 1680-1] New clamav packages fix potential codeexecution

2008-12-10 Thread Dominic Hargreaves
On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 06:48:59PM +0100, Tony Nederpel wrote: > But the volatile fixed version (0.94.dfsg.2-1~volatile ( > http://volatile.debian.org/debian-volatile/pool/volatile/main/c/clamav/clamav-base_0.94.dfsg.2-1%7Evolatile1_all.deb > )) is already placed in the volatile archive. It's in

Re: [SECURITY] [DSA 1680-1] New clamav packages fix potential codeexecution

2008-12-10 Thread Tony Nederpel
But the volatile fixed version (0.94.dfsg.2-1~volatile ( http://volatile.debian.org/debian-volatile/pool/volatile/main/c/clamav/clamav-base_0.94.dfsg.2-1%7Evolatile1_all.deb )) is already placed in the volatile archive. Or will it only be updated when it is in the security archive? With kind

Re: Freeze SO Linux, it's possible?

2008-12-10 Thread Rolf Kutz
On 10/12/08 18:40 +0100, Sjors Gielen wrote: Izak Burger wrote: On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 6:51 PM, Carlos Carrero Gutierrez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi, i would like to freeze my linux in order to freeze the OS, then, when I reboot the computer all changes that i made in the computer dissapears

Re: Freeze SO Linux, it's possible?

2008-12-10 Thread Sjors Gielen
Hr. Philip Rueegsegger wrote: >> X-TM-IMSS-Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> Old-Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.3 (2007-08-08) on liszt.debian.org >> X-Spam-Level: [..snip..] >> X-TM-AS-Result: No--16.227-5.0-31-1 >> X-imss-scan-details: No--16.227-5.

Re: Freeze SO Linux, it's possible?

2008-12-10 Thread Hr. Philip Rueegsegger
>X-TM-IMSS-Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Old-Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.3 (2007-08-08) on liszt.debian.org >X-Spam-Level: >X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.0 required=4.0 tests=GMAIL,LDOSUBSCRIBER, LDO_WHITELIST autolearn=failed version=3.2.3 >X-Orig

Re: Freeze SO Linux, it's possible?

2008-12-10 Thread Sjors Gielen
Izak Burger wrote: > On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 6:51 PM, Carlos Carrero Gutierrez > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Hi, i would like to freeze my linux in order to freeze the OS, then, >> when I reboot the computer all changes that i made in the computer >> dissapears and it returns to the previous OS f

Re: Freeze SO Linux, it's possible?

2008-12-10 Thread Izak Burger
On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 6:51 PM, Carlos Carrero Gutierrez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, i would like to freeze my linux in order to freeze the OS, then, > when I reboot the computer all changes that i made in the computer > dissapears and it returns to the previous OS freezed. Cross posting is

Re: [SECURITY] [DSA 1680-1] New clamav packages fix potential code execution

2008-12-10 Thread Jim Popovitch
On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 07:27, Dominic Hargreaves <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I don't think that's relevant to volatile versions though. To Volatile or Not to Volatile. That is the question (now).Is volatile a dead thing and security now back to real-time updates? I'm ok with manually downl

Freeze SO Linux, it's possible?

2008-12-10 Thread Carlos Carrero Gutierrez
Hi, i would like to freeze my linux in order to freeze the OS, then, when I reboot the computer all changes that i made in the computer dissapears and it returns to the previous OS freezed. In windows there is something similar, called "Deep Freeze" (it's freeware). Somebody could help me? Than

Re: [SECURITY] [DSA 1680-1] New clamav packages fix potential code execution

2008-12-10 Thread Dominic Hargreaves
On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 11:51:49AM +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > Dominic Hargreaves <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (10/12/2008): > > Looks like it is in the etch-proposed-updates/etch dist, though, if > > you wanted it. Volatile admins, is there something wrong with this > > package or has it just been forg

Re: [SECURITY] [DSA 1680-1] New clamav packages fix potential code execution

2008-12-10 Thread Cyril Brulebois
Dominic Hargreaves <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (10/12/2008): > Looks like it is in the etch-proposed-updates/etch dist, though, if > you wanted it. Volatile admins, is there something wrong with this > package or has it just been forgotten about? Correct according to: http://release.debian.org/proposed-up

Re: Re: [SECURITY] [DSA 1680-1] New clamav packages fix potentialcode execution

2008-12-10 Thread Mapper ict department
Yes that line was already in. (deb http://security.debian.org/ stable/updates main) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [SECURITY] [DSA 1680-1] New clamav packages fix potential code execution

2008-12-10 Thread Dominic Hargreaves
On Tue, Dec 09, 2008 at 11:05:28PM -0500, Jim Popovitch wrote: > I am seeing the same thing. The fix is on volatile.d.o as > clamav_0.94.dfsg.2-1~volatile1, but apt-get upgrade is not recognizing > it. I don't see it in the Releases file either. Looks like it is in the etch-proposed-updates/etch