However if that is the case, I wonder if oldstable support could be
extended for some more time.
But why? There is a *stable* release with security support. Debian isn't
made for skipping a whole release. And the end of support for etch was
announced long ago, so that everyone had enough time
Dear Johannes,
On 01/22/2010 11:27 PM, Johannes Wiedersich wrote:
A typical Debian upgrade will lead to
a downtime on the order of a few minutes once every 2 years, compared to
tedious manual reinstallation required on other systems. It is
straightforward to semi-automatically upgrade some 100
Dear Moritz,
On 01/22/2010 07:14 PM, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
On 2010-01-22, Thiemo Nagelthiemo.na...@ph.tum.de wrote:
The Security Team has discussed and stated before: If large institutions
want a longer support cycle for oldstable they should colloborate to fund
this externally. Supporting
* Thiemo Nagel thiemo.na...@ph.tum.de wrote:
Dear Johannes,
On 01/22/2010 11:27 PM, Johannes Wiedersich wrote:
A typical Debian upgrade will lead to
a downtime on the order of a few minutes once every 2 years, compared to
tedious manual reinstallation required on other systems. It is
4 matches
Mail list logo
