Stop your spam chat please
Original Message
On 9 juin 2016 11:50, Joel Rees wrote:
Can I suggest to those who responded to these that kneejerk reactions
aren't useful?
And that, if you really don't understand the nature of these, there is
quite a lot of information to be
On Thu, Jun 9, 2016 at 5:50 PM, Joel Rees wrote:
> Can I suggest to those who responded to these that kneejerk reactions
> aren't useful?
The people who got the spam with a spoofed address are unlikely to be
subscribed to this list.
> FTR, we assume that someone was spoofing luciano's email
Can I suggest to those who responded to these that kneejerk reactions
aren't useful?
And that, if you really don't understand the nature of these, there is
quite a lot of information to be gained by looking at the raw source
and using a search site (instead of jumping to the urls to see what
they
CVE-2015-1797: RESERVED
CVE-2016-2830: RESERVED
CVE-2016-3100: RESERVED
--
The output might be a bit terse, but the above ids are known elsewhere,
check the references in the tracker. The second part indicates the status
of that id in the tracker at the moment the script was run.
5 matches
Mail list logo