Re: [SECURITY] [DSA 3586-1] atheme-services security update

2016-06-09 Thread Ladislav Tkac

Re: 9n216.13.107.82

2016-06-09 Thread Johnnyb
Stop your spam chat please Original Message On 9 juin 2016 11:50, Joel Rees wrote: Can I suggest to those who responded to these that kneejerk reactions aren't useful? And that, if you really don't understand the nature of these, there is quite a lot of information to be

Re: 9n216.13.107.82

2016-06-09 Thread Paul Wise
On Thu, Jun 9, 2016 at 5:50 PM, Joel Rees wrote: > Can I suggest to those who responded to these that kneejerk reactions > aren't useful? The people who got the spam with a spoofed address are unlikely to be subscribed to this list. > FTR, we assume that someone was spoofing luciano's email

Re: 9n216.13.107.82

2016-06-09 Thread Joel Rees
Can I suggest to those who responded to these that kneejerk reactions aren't useful? And that, if you really don't understand the nature of these, there is quite a lot of information to be gained by looking at the raw source and using a search site (instead of jumping to the urls to see what they

External check

2016-06-09 Thread Raphael Geissert
CVE-2015-1797: RESERVED CVE-2016-2830: RESERVED CVE-2016-3100: RESERVED -- The output might be a bit terse, but the above ids are known elsewhere, check the references in the tracker. The second part indicates the status of that id in the tracker at the moment the script was run.